#248: proventester request
--+-
Reporter: kashyapc | Owner: mcloaked
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Dear folks,
I have several machines running Fedora 16 fully updated to today's updates.
All have been behaving well, except for one. The output on the screen is very
big. I have to use the mouse to scroll to see the activities button and to
shutdown. A student was using the machine when all
Jason White writes:
> Have you tried configuring speech-dispatcher to use a network socket rather
> than a UNIX socket, e.g., 127.0.0.1? That might give you a work-around until
> the real issue is fixed.
>
Good idea. Turns out this is fairly simple. In my
/etc/speech-dispatcher/speechd.conf, I do:
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Release Candidate 1
should have been composed at this point. However, all blocker bugs have
not been addressed, so we are sending out a Fedora 16 Final Test Compose
3 (TC3) with all currently available fixes for testing instead. Please
see the foll
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 12:37 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Can someone please put something about this in the F15 -> F16 section
> of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum? I'd do
> it except I don't have permission to edit the page. Which is odd,
> because I did before. It wou
Can someone please put something about this in the F15 -> F16 section of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading_Fedora_using_yum? I'd do it
except I don't have permission to edit the page. Which is odd, because I
did before. It would seem that someone has decided I'm not trustworthy
enough? *
# F16 Final Blocker Review meeting #5
# Date: 2011-10-28
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The fifth Fedora 16 final blocker bug review meeting will be this
Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be running through the
final b
On 10/27/2011 12:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 15:31 +0200, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Also, it appears that the abrt-ccpp service wasn't enabled, and I
suspect that's the problem I'm seeing. I just ran "systemctl enable
abrt-ccpp.service" to fix that issue. Shouldn't it have
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 15:31 +0200, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> > Also, it appears that the abrt-ccpp service wasn't enabled, and I
> > suspect that's the problem I'm seeing. I just ran "systemctl enable
> > abrt-ccpp.service" to fix that issue. Shouldn't it have been enabled
> > by default? I certai
On Thu, 27 Oct 2011 07:59:12 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> Quick question,
>
> how do rel-eng guys know which updates are OK to push to stable
> during freeze and which are not? For example we have the final freeze
> now. Some packages like this:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDO
Jonathan Kamens writes:
> I wrote:
>> On 10/27/2011 08:08 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
>>> $ service abrt-ccpp restart
>> Didn't fix the problem. Still nothing happens when GnuCash crashes
>> (a crash which I can reproduce at will, so it's an easy test case).
> Actually, I take that back, I think
I wrote:
On 10/27/2011 08:08 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
$ service abrt-ccpp restart
Didn't fix the problem. Still nothing happens when GnuCash crashes (a
crash which I can reproduce at will, so it's an easy test case).
Actually, I take that back, I think restarting did fix the problem. It's
j
On 10/27/2011 8:46 AM, Richard Marko wrote:
On 10/27/2011 02:42 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 10/27/2011 08:08 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
$ service abrt-ccpp restart
Didn't fix the problem. Still nothing happens when GnuCash crashes (a
crash which I can reproduce at will, so it's an easy test
On 10/27/2011 02:42 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
On 10/27/2011 08:08 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
$ service abrt-ccpp restart
Didn't fix the problem. Still nothing happens when GnuCash crashes (a
crash which I can reproduce at will, so it's an easy test case).
Give us the steps to reproduce it so
On 10/27/2011 08:08 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
$ service abrt-ccpp restart
Didn't fix the problem. Still nothing happens when GnuCash crashes (a
crash which I can reproduce at will, so it's an easy test case).
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
drop here output from core_pattern
|/usr/libex
Jonathan Kamens writes:
> This problem is happening to me again... GnuCash crashed on my several
> times last night and abrt didn't say anything at all.
>
> GnuCash logs in /var/log/messages:
>
> Oct 26 22:58:51 jik2 kernel: [54141.937933] gnucash[19580]: segfault
> at 58 ip 003712a8399d sp 0
This problem is happening to me again... GnuCash crashed on my several
times last night and abrt didn't say anything at all.
GnuCash logs in /var/log/messages:
Oct 26 22:58:51 jik2 kernel: [54141.937933] gnucash[19580]: segfault at
58 ip 003712a8399d sp 7fff52d700c0 error 4 in
libgtk-
Quick question,
how do rel-eng guys know which updates are OK to push to stable during freeze
and which are not? For example we have the final freeze now. Some packages like
this:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14932
are needed to be pushed to stable repo, so they have an ex
Compose started at Thu Oct 27 08:15:26 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PackageKit-zif-0.6.19-2.fc16.x86_64 requires zif >= 0:0.2.5
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
cluster-snmp-0.18.7-
The new loader was able to find a BIOS partition and
hence net-install F16 Wednesday.
Omen.com uses p1p1 to talk with Comcast and p37p1
for the local net. The server does NAT, mail and Apache.
Dnsmasq does dhcp, dns and pxeboot for the local net.
For some reason the gateway setting was scrambled
20 matches
Mail list logo
