Dne 18.10.2011 16:02, Matej Cepl napsal(a):
> Dne 17.10.2011 21:25, Mohan R napsal(a):
>> Is anyone using Bugzilla-Triage-Scripts plugin in f15. I'm not able to
>> see NEEDINFO buttons appearing near 'Status'.
>
> Yes, I will have to revert CachedRequest merge. Tonight.
I hope this has been fixed
On 10/18/2011 09:07 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 01:27 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> having big problems to burn a re-writable cd: after creating a new data
>> project and dragging the desired files to the appropriate k3b window, I
>> press the burn "button", but nothing happ
Once upon a time, David Lehman said:
> I just tried it and it worked fine. If you put your ks.cfg and
> the /tmp/storage.log from your install somewhere I can take a look and
> tell you what went wrong.
Okay, I'm probably doing it wrong then. Here's my simplified ks.cfg.
It is a simplified examp
We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
for testing updates.
* Intro/gather more agenda items
* Recruiting more proventesters/testers.
* One stop page for upda
Hey, folks. So we pinned down that mysterious 'F16 Desktop live x86_64
install boots to a black screen' bug. Turns out that liveinst will
always corrupt a small amount of data on install with anaconda 16.21;
it's actually also happening in all the other live images that 'aren't
affected', it's just
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 16:41 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, David Lehman said:
> > I will be fixing kickstart when I get the chance to make this
> > requirement consistent. If your root filesystem is ext[234], see 'man
> > mke2fs.conf' and create yourself a profile in %pre which you
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13795
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14180
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14447
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
Once upon a time, David Lehman said:
> I will be fixing kickstart when I get the chance to make this
> requirement consistent. If your root filesystem is ext[234], see 'man
> mke2fs.conf' and create yourself a profile in %pre which you can then
> specify when defining your root filesystem (--fspro
Adam Williamson wrote:
> That's not the same thing at all. That's exactly the*opposite* thing.
Maybe it's opposite day for Mr. Chambers, Adam. :p
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 13:59 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:47 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a graphics problem with F16 TC1.
> > >
> > > Install DVD and LiveCD do work flawless. B
On 10/18/2011 01:27 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> having big problems to burn a re-writable cd: after creating a new data
> project and dragging the desired files to the appropriate k3b window, I
> press the burn "button", but nothing happens.
>
> Anybody sees this too?
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:47 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a graphics problem with F16 TC1.
> >
> > Install DVD and LiveCD do work flawless. But the installed systems seems
> > to have graphics problems in both
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 18:47 +0200, Robert M. Albrecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a graphics problem with F16 TC1.
>
> Install DVD and LiveCD do work flawless. But the installed systems seems
> to have graphics problems in both cases.
>
> Plymouth is visible, but GDM or firstboot do not show up.
>
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 09:40 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > It means if you're doing a fresh install, you've got to format
> > wherever
> > / is going. You can't install over top of an existing /. Is that
> > what
> > you thought it meant?
> >
> > - Chris
>
> I imagine this could be very inconven
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:13 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote:
> >
> > What I am saying here is that the amount of work required to support
> > this outweighs the benefit.
>
> Well, no, not really. The only additional thing which is re
Hi,
having big problems to burn a re-writable cd: after creating a new data
project and dragging the desired files to the appropriate k3b window, I
press the burn "button", but nothing happens.
Anybody sees this too?
Kind regards
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:17:00 -0400
Chris Lumens wrote:
> > > > in the kickstart file? Or is this blocked as well?
> > >
> > > That's going to be blocked as well, since you're doing the same
> > > thing as interactive but through kickstart.
>
> Looking at the patch, this appears to only affect i
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:32:10PM -0400, Chris Lumens wrote:
>
> What I am saying here is that the amount of work required to support
> this outweighs the benefit.
Well, no, not really. The only additional thing which is really now
needed is an option "Yes, I know what I am doing even if this i
Hi!
After installing the F16 beta, suspend/resume did work on my Thinkpad X220.
Now after some updates the system won't resume anymore but just blink with
all its LEDs including ThinkLight.
How can I debug what's going wrong here?
The approach described in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_ke
Hi,
I have a graphics problem with F16 TC1.
Install DVD and LiveCD do work flawless. But the installed systems seems
to have graphics problems in both cases.
Plymouth is visible, but GDM or firstboot do not show up.
Switching to text consoles does work; the system is running, network is
up, .
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:07 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 10/18/2011 11:58 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > The amount of work you're describing here is huge, and the number of
> > people who would benefit from such a setup is very small. I'd guess
> > that for whatever scenario you can imagine,
> And yet several people here on your volunteer test team, the people
> who are willing and able to use new releases early so that problems
> are fleshed out and can be addressed before release, have stated
> that they use this ability on a regular basis and would be pained to
> see it go.
>
> A r
On 10/18/2011 12:16 PM, clum...@redhat.com wrote:
The corner case here is what you are describing. I can't remember a
time anyone has ever asked to do this
And yet several people here on your volunteer test team, the people who
are willing and able to use new releases early so that problems are
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 00:25 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> This is the only place I can remember encountering such an installation
> restriction. My 40 or so machines average in excess of 6 OSes per. There's
> just no room for a forced procedural deviation of this magnitude in my
> environment. Eve
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:01 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > So does anaconda expose the full set of mkfs options, since you are now
> > artificially restricting running mkfs in %pre?
>
> Since apparently this change doesn't affect ks install
On 10/18/2011 11:58 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
The amount of work you're describing here is huge, and the number of
people who would benefit from such a setup is very small. I'd guess
that for whatever scenario you can imagine, another scenario can be
imagined that would not be able to be handled.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:51:13AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
> > sudo.
> >
> > [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
> > [sudo] password for mike:
> > mike is not in the sudo
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:51 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> > Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
>> > sudo.
>> >
>> > [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
>
> >The amount of work you're describing here is huge, and the number of
> >people who would benefit from such a setup is very small. I'd guess
> >that for whatever scenario you can imagine, another scenario can be
> >imagined that would not be able to be handled.
> I disagree with just about every
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 10:47 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
> sudo.
>
> [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
> [sudo] password for mike:
> mike is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
Upgrading glibc to glibc-2.1
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:51 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
> > sudo.
> >
> > [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
> > [sudo] password for mike:
> > mike is not in the sudoers fil
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 12:07 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 11:51 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >> > Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me t
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> So does anaconda expose the full set of mkfs options, since you are now
> artificially restricting running mkfs in %pre?
Since apparently this change doesn't affect ks installs, I'm fine with
it - it makes a ton of sense. It would be intere
> As others have pointed out. Anaconda should remove whatever it needs
> to remove in order to install what it needs to install.
>
> This is not an impossible or even particularly hard problem to
> solve. It is merely a problem that no one has taken the time to
> solve, with the result that RPM wi
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
> sudo.
>
> [mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
> [sudo] password for mike:
> mike is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
>
>
> [sudo] password for mike:
Currently neither of the 2 boxes I have F16 on, will allow me to use
sudo.
[mike@scooby ~]$ sudo yum update
[sudo] password for mike:
mike is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
[sudo] password for mike:
mike is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
Y
On 10/18/2011 11:41 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
I think this is completely unreasonable to expect. You think we should
be able to take a /, which might have the leftovers of previous failed
installations, do an install on top of that without removing what was
there, and the result should be a fully
> If the installer is sufficiently aggressive about warning clueless
> users to let it reformat / unless they really, really know what
> they're doing, then people who choose still not to reformat / and
> end up with a broken system have only themselves to blame, and their
> bugs can justifiably an
As a user lurking here to learn, I really hope such behavior change not be
present in RHEL7.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/18/2011 11:17 AM, Chris Lumens wrote:
There's nothing arbitrary about this. We got no end of bugs from
people trying to do an install over top of an existing install,
perhaps one that was successful, and perhaps one that was only halfway
done. We need to be able to start from a known stat
> > > in the kickstart file? Or is this blocked as well?
> >
> > That's going to be blocked as well, since you're doing the same thing as
> > interactive but through kickstart.
Looking at the patch, this appears to only affect interactive installs -
not kickstart.
> So does anaconda expose the f
On 10/18/2011 02:08 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
>> Yes, that is what it means. We can't sensibly expect to be able to
>> reliably install to a root partition with data on it.
>
> Does this affect kickstart installs? I have some kickstarts that
> manually creat
-0.3.1-1.fc16.i686'
(http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched-20111018/logs/pungify-i386.log)
Dave
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Once upon a time, clum...@redhat.com said:
> > Hmm, that might be unfortunate. We use a fresh kickstart onto an
> > existing / partition; will it still work to specify
> >
> > part / --onpart /dev/sda3 --noformat
> >
> > in the kickstart file? Or is this blocked as well?
>
> That's going to be
> Hmm, that might be unfortunate. We use a fresh kickstart onto an
> existing / partition; will it still work to specify
>
> part / --onpart /dev/sda3 --noformat
>
> in the kickstart file? Or is this blocked as well?
That's going to be blocked as well, since you're doing the same thing as
intera
Dne 17.10.2011 21:25, Mohan R napsal(a):
> Is anyone using Bugzilla-Triage-Scripts plugin in f15. I'm not able to
> see NEEDINFO buttons appearing near 'Status'.
Yes, I will have to revert CachedRequest merge. Tonight.
Matěj
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http
> It means if you're doing a fresh install, you've got to format
> wherever
> / is going. You can't install over top of an existing /. Is that
> what
> you thought it meant?
>
> - Chris
I imagine this could be very inconvenient for me when switching distributions.
I always have / and /home on
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:13 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> Yes, that is what it means. We can't sensibly expect to be able to
> reliably install to a root partition with data on it.
Does this affect kickstart installs? I have some kickstarts that
manually create filesystems in %pre to get specific mkfs options (
Compose started at Tue Oct 18 08:15:25 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit)
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
cluster-s
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> Hello,
> is it expected to work a command such as this, after downloading
> vmlinuz and initrd for f16 final tc1 (x86_64):
>
> virt-install --os-type=linux --os-variant=fedora16 --boot
> kernel=/tmp/f16tc1/vmlinuz,initrd=/tmp/f16tc1/initrd.
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:04:24 -0400
Chris Lumens wrote:
> > Ah only for fresh installs. Well that makes sense. I wasn't reading
> > it for upgrades too, which would have caused a problem or two.
>
> I've updated the wiki page to clarify this.
>
> - Chris
Hmm, that might be unfortunate. We use a
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:37 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:16:31PM -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > If so, how do you have it setup via mail_location? Also, if your using
> > evolution on the client side, are you able to go to the imap server and
> > point to it and create a
53 matches
Mail list logo
