On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 19:40 -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
> I am not able to see the x86-64 iso.
>From the announce:
"*NOTE*: The x86_64 install images are currently missing due to trouble
making efiboot.img. Hopefully they will be added later."
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
> is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
> Serverbeach1 is still available as
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions.
Serverbeach1 is still available as a mirror (but with approximately a 1
hour lag behind dl), so if
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 16:02 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 03:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Thanks again for this suggestion, Albert. Following this discussion I
> > went ahead and amended the Beta criteria to:
> >
> > The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
On 10/14/2011 03:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thanks again for this suggestion, Albert. Following this discussion I
> went ahead and amended the Beta criteria to:
>
> The release must be able host virtual guest instances of the same
> release, using Fedora's current preferred virtualization tech
Thank you adam
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Williamson"
To: agra...@g-b.net
Cc: pjo...@redhat.com, "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 3:48:29 PM
Subject: Re: Release criteria: virtualization tweak
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:19 +0100,
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 19:19 +0100, agraham wrote:
> On 09/08/2011 02:20 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, all. pjones pointed out at a recent blocker review meeting that the
> > Beta virt criterion:
> >
> > "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> > where the virtua
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:44 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> During Final blocker review meetings, we've come up against a couple of
> bugsto do with missing translations that we'd like to consider for Final
> blocker status:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706756
> https://bugzilla
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:24 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
> > already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My
> > implicit assumption was that Dom0 wo
==
#fedora-bugzappers: f16-final-blocker-review-3
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-10-14/f16-final-blocker-review-3.2011-10-14-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedo
Not sure if I recognize the nick from IRC, but welcome
- Original Message -
From: "Nicolas Corrarello"
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:39:19 PM
Subject: Hello World!
Hey,
Some of you have probably seen me on IRC right now, I want to help in
the Fedora
Hey,
Some of you have probably seen me on IRC right now, I want to help in
the Fedora Bug Zappers Team.
I have working with Fedora and Red Hat Linux for years, and, as most of
us, I want to give something back.
I've a lot of experience as a SysAdmin (right now I'm working as a
Solution Architect
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 12:24:22 -0500
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Is the level of dbus-daemon logging scheduled to be cut back soon?
> Currently there is still a large amount of logging going on and it is
> getting close to final freeze.
Yea, I see vast amounts of messages with DEBUG in them talking ab
Hey,
Some of you have probably seen me on IRC right now, I want to help in
the Fedora Bug Zappers Team.
I have working with Fedora and Red Hat Linux for years, and, as most of
us, I want to give something back.
I've a lot of experience as a SysAdmin (right now I'm working as a
Solution Architect
Is the level of dbus-daemon logging scheduled to be cut back soon?
Currently there is still a large amount of logging going on and it is
getting close to final freeze.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 10/14/2011 12:26 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> With todays f16 yum update, first I saw this..
>
> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> grub2 conflicts with (installed) grub-1:0.97-80.fc16.x86_64
>
> Which I got around by doing --exclude=grub2
> When everything else had updated, I did another
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 12:26 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> With todays f16 yum update, first I saw this..
>
> ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
> grub2 conflicts with (installed) grub-1:0.97-80.fc16.x86_64
>
> Which I got around by doing --exclude=grub2
> When everything else had updated, I d
With todays f16 yum update, first I saw this..
ERROR with transaction check vs depsolve:
grub2 conflicts with (installed) grub-1:0.97-80.fc16.x86_64
Which I got around by doing --exclude=grub2
When everything else had updated, I did another yum update.
This is what it did..
$ sudo yum -y update
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 10:14 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 14.10.2011 01:45, Tom Horsley napsal(a):
> > Every time I get a new grub2 update, it resets the
> > /etc/default/grub file, wiping out all my customizations,
>
> Why in the world it is /etc/default (which is coming from the Debian
> world
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 14:30 +0200, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Wed Oct 12 01:30:57 UTC 2011 Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There's nothing really interesting in the xorg-x11-drv package any more.
> > All the interesting bits are in the kernel module, which gets updated
> > very frequently.
>
> Ok.
> S
On 14/10/11 12:11, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Running grub2-mkconfig without options does only print the config file
> to standard output. You would need
>
>grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
>
> to actually overwrite your GRUB 2 config file.
Thanks Michael,
That was it,
>
>> grub2-ins
Compose started at Fri Oct 14 08:16:10 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 08:35 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>> http://news.opensuse.org/2011/10/11/opensuse-announces-first-public-release-of-
>> openqa/
>
> saw it!
>
> in fact, we've talked to one of the lead developers before.
>
> it's got som
On 10/14/2011 01:51 AM, Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 04:03 PM, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>> So I go in with my fingerprint to see what is happening, and I run a
>> sudo command (really slick the fingerprint auth with sudo, kudos),
>> trouble is it tells me I am not in the sudoers file. W
On Fri Oct 14 12:48:32 UTC 2011 drago01 wrote:
> > So the link I gave:
> > http://nouveau.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=nouveau/envytools;a=commitdiff;h=b645e6f7d9f204a9176747f129e9e365dcd877ce
> > is somethng about kernel part of nouveau?
>
> No this is completely unrelated.
Ok. I see only
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
wrote:
> On Wed Oct 12 01:30:57 UTC 2011 Adam Williamson wrote:
>> There's nothing really interesting in the xorg-x11-drv package any more.
>> All the interesting bits are in the kernel module, which gets updated
>> very frequently.
>
> Ok.
> So the
On Wed Oct 12 01:30:57 UTC 2011 Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's nothing really interesting in the xorg-x11-drv package any more.
> All the interesting bits are in the kernel module, which gets updated
> very frequently.
Ok.
So the link I gave:
http://nouveau.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=n
Compose started at Fri Oct 14 08:16:19 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit)
bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit)
cluster-s
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 09:42:44 -0400, AJ (Adam) wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-10-09 at 17:26 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Shortly before the Plymouth LUKS passphrase prompt, the screen turns black,
> > the monitor reports "No signal" and enters power-saving mode. The system
> > hasn't crashed, beca
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:22:21 +0100, FM (Frank) wrote:
> After todays update.
>
> Grub2 replaced grub.
>
> rebooted grub menu still loading.
> So did.
> grub2-mkconfig
> done.
Running grub2-mkconfig without options does only print the config file
to standard output. You would need
grub2-mkcon
On 10/14/2011 06:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 06:37:22AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So this might give you an insight: I just did an install from RC4 and my
>>> user was in the sudo group. Then
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 06:37:22AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
>
> >
> > So this might give you an insight: I just did an install from RC4 and my
> > user was in the sudo group. Then a yum update and tada: no more. I mean
> > us
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 05:51:15PM +0800, Frederic Muller wrote:
>
> So this might give you an insight: I just did an install from RC4 and my
> user was in the sudo group. Then a yum update and tada: no more. I mean
> using sudo just tells me my user is not in the sudo group.
This is a known b
On 10/13/2011 04:03 PM, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> So I go in with my fingerprint to see what is happening, and I run a
> sudo command (really slick the fingerprint auth with sudo, kudos),
> trouble is it tells me I am not in the sudoers file. Well that is odd it
> used to work. My sudoers is bas
After todays update.
Grub2 replaced grub.
rebooted grub menu still loading.
So did.
grub2-mkconfig
done.
grub2-install /dev/vda
no errors reported.
rebooted got:
grub >
Where do I go from here,
to get a booting vm back.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of fedoraproject.org
--
t
Dne 14.10.2011 01:45, Tom Horsley napsal(a):
> Every time I get a new grub2 update, it resets the
> /etc/default/grub file, wiping out all my customizations,
Why in the world it is /etc/default (which is coming from the Debian
world) and not /etc/sysconfig?
Matěj
--
test mailing list
test@list
36 matches
Mail list logo
