On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 11:20:35 PM, Al wrote:
> On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 9:37:13 PM, Adam wrote:
>> Erm, if you're doing a live install you can just run a terminal.
> Ah.For some reason, that never occurred to me.
By the way, the F15 beta was the first release that I'd e
On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 9:37:13 PM, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 20:04 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:15:20 PM, Adam wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote:
>> >> >> disk setup (all sata2/3)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> p1: 120GB gpt wi
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 20:04 -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
> On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:15:20 PM, Adam wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote:
> >> >> disk setup (all sata2/3)
> >> >>
> >> >> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
> >> >> p2: 3TB gpt
> >> >> ( p3: 3TB (true
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 19:45 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> Every time I get a new grub2 update, it resets the
> /etc/default/grub file, wiping out all my customizations,
> and apparently the customizations that Anaconda made
> in order to generate the grub.cfg file that says
> "Fedora" instead of "Lin
On Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:15:20 PM, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote:
>> >> disk setup (all sata2/3)
>> >>
>> >> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
>> >> p2: 3TB gpt
>> >> ( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) )
>> >> p4: DVD
>>
>> anaconda throws a
>>
>> "you ha
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13795
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14180
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14000
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14216
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13456
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13504
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
Every time I get a new grub2 update, it resets the
/etc/default/grub file, wiping out all my customizations,
and apparently the customizations that Anaconda made
in order to generate the grub.cfg file that says
"Fedora" instead of "Linux" in the menu, etc.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 23:54 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
> > Well, the latest update wants to replace grub with grub2 and update
> > grub-efi.
> >
> >
> > I hesitate to execute the update, will EFI systems still boot?
>
> Yes, it shou
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 23:54 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
> Well, the latest update wants to replace grub with grub2 and update
> grub-efi.
>
>
> I hesitate to execute the update, will EFI systems still boot?
Yes, it should. grub-efi does not require grub; all the EFI bits are in
grub-efi. J
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Christian Menzel <
christian.men...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>>
>> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
>> >
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 17:07 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> > > > Tim
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:46:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> > > Tim Flink wrote:
> > >
> > >> My intention was to include issues with DomU r
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 15:20 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> It feels like we just got done with beta testing, but it's time for
> some F16 pre-final TC1 testing!
>
> We have new builds for anaconda, parted and lorax that could use some
> karma.
>
> If you can successfully install, please give karma to:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 15:35 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> > Tim Flink wrote:
> >
> >> My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
> >> already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen base
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:35:00 -0400
Josh Boyer wrote:
> > How about:
> > - The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases
> > providing a functional, supported Xen Dom0 and cloud providers
> > utilizing Xen. This does not include any issues limited to the
> > release functi
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 10:06:26 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> That would be worth a +1, really (and I've tested the EFI side). If you
> could change your comment to a +1 that'd be great.
I changed my votes to +1. grub was already queued for stable, but grub2
is still in testing.
--
test
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> Tim Flink wrote:
>
>> My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
>> already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My
>> implicit assumption was that Dom0 would a
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:24 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
> Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
> > already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My
> > implicit assumption was that Dom0 wo
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 13:18:39 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> My intention was to include issues with DomU running locally (with an
> already functional Fedora Dom0) or on a Xen based cloud provider. My
> implicit assumption was that Dom0 would already be working but since
> F16 is the first supported Do
El Tue, 04 Oct 2011 22:05:31 -0700
Adam Williamson escribió:
> On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 03:00 +0100, Andy Burns wrote:
> > On 30 September 2011 20:23, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So this discussion seems to have stalled. Tim and I are both
> > > ambivalent, and we got three responses that
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:03:02 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> > - The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with releases
> >supporting Xen Dom0 and cloud providers utilizing Xen.
>
> 'With releases supporting Xen Dom0' is slightly vague but probably
> good enough for now.
I wanted to
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:54:12 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> After discussions both here and on devel@, there have been no
> objections to adding Xen DomU (guest) support as a release criterion
> for Fedora 16.
I probably should have included this in the previous message, but just
to be 100% clear:
-
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:54 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> After discussions both here and on devel@, there have been no
> objections to adding Xen DomU (guest) support as a release criterion for
> Fedora 16.
>
> So, I am proposing that we add the following as a release criterion for
> Fedora 16 final:
After discussions both here and on devel@, there have been no
objections to adding Xen DomU (guest) support as a release criterion for
Fedora 16.
So, I am proposing that we add the following as a release criterion for
Fedora 16 final:
- The release must boot successfully as Xen DomU with release
On 10/13/2011 10:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>>>
Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:16 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:39:12 +0530
> A S Alam wrote:
>
> > ਵੀਰਵਾਰ 13 ਅਕਤੂਬਰ 2011 07:22 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, Adam Williamson ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> > > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:14 +0530, A S Alam wrote:
> > >
> > >> I want to add that although translation availabl
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:44:35 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> * The installer, bootup and login processes should correctly display
> all translations that are available for use
>
> the intent is that where the translation team has actually provided
> translations of this key content, they should b
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 07:39:12 +0530
A S Alam wrote:
> ਵੀਰਵਾਰ 13 ਅਕਤੂਬਰ 2011 07:22 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, Adam Williamson ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> > On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:14 +0530, A S Alam wrote:
> >
> >> I want to add that although translation available for some
> >> language need not to be blocker, but string should
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 12:04 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> >
> > > Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> > > problem?
> >
> > Not sure ab
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 11:18 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote:
> >> disk setup (all sata2/3)
> >>
> >> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
> >> p2: 3TB gpt
> >> ( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) )
> >> p4: DVD
>
> ups its
> p1: 3TB GPT (where 600GB linux and a win data part. should end)
> (p2: 3TB GPT (truecr
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 08:35 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://news.opensuse.org/2011/10/11/opensuse-announces-first-public-release-of-
> openqa/
saw it!
in fact, we've talked to one of the lead developers before.
it's got some cool design features, a reasonably nice results interface,
and it's
Please check logrotate - for me it doesn't work also.
Thanks.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 08:50 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:51:05 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > test in whatever setups you can. The intended behaviour is that if you
> > yum update a system with grub installed from a repo with both packages
> > available, grub w
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 15:38 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
>
> > Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> > problem?
>
> Not sure about that one, haven't seen it on either of my systems. They
> both log
# F16 Final Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2011-10-14
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The third Fedora 16 final blocker bug review meeting will be this
Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be running through the
final b
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 16:51:05 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> test in whatever setups you can. The intended behaviour is that if you
> yum update a system with grub installed from a repo with both packages
> available, grub will be replaced with both grub-efi and grub2.
> Post-update, grub sh
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 18:46 +0200, Christian Menzel wrote:
>
> > What's eventually going to happen is that grub2 will replace
> > grub and
> > you'll have to write a new config manually. You can beat the
> >
>> disk setup (all sata2/3)
>>
>> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
>> p2: 3TB gpt
>> ( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) )
>> p4: DVD
ups its
p1: 3TB GPT (where 600GB linux and a win data part. should end)
(p2: 3TB GPT (truecrypt vol))
p3: 120G GPT window7 EFI
>> I installed win7 via efi first (with
A number of interesting things broke/fixed themselves today in F16. But
first a bit of history.
GDM has not been working for me for a couple of weeks at this point,
about 70% of the time I can't login when clicking on my user name (after
entering my password I will hit enter and nothing happens),
40 matches
Mail list logo
