Hey, everyone. It's that time again - there's a Test Day coming up
tomorrow. This one's of particular interest to you devel list readers,
so prick up your ears!
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-10-13_Fedora_Packager_for_Eclipse
The topic is the Fedora Packager for Eclipse plugin, whic
ਵੀਰਵਾਰ 13 ਅਕਤੂਬਰ 2011 07:22 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, Adam Williamson ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:14 +0530, A S Alam wrote:
>
>> I want to add that although translation available for some language need
>> not to be blocker, but string should be i18n, so that if language teams
>> want, then they can do t
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 07:14 +0530, A S Alam wrote:
> I want to add that although translation available for some language need
> not to be blocker, but string should be i18n, so that if language teams
> want, then they can do translation. i18n failure case [1].
You mean, you think we should also r
ਵੀਰਵਾਰ 13 ਅਕਤੂਬਰ 2011 01:14 ਸਵੇਰੇ ਨੂੰ, Adam Williamson ਨੇ ਲਿਖਿਆ:
> During Final blocker review meetings, we've come up against a couple of
> bugsto do with missing translations that we'd like to consider for Final
> blocker status:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706756
> https://b
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13795
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14180
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14000
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14216
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13456
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13504
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 15:20 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> It feels like we just got done with beta testing, but it's time for
> some F16 pre-final TC1 testing!
>
> We have new builds for anaconda, parted and lorax that could use some
> karma.
>
> If you can successfully install, please give karma to:
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 00:44 +0200, Moritz Baumann wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have problems with booting into window$ after installing linux.
>
> disk setup (all sata2/3)
>
> p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
> p2: 3TB gpt
> ( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) )
> p4: DVD
>
> I installed win7 via efi fi
Hi there,
I have problems with booting into window$ after installing linux.
disk setup (all sata2/3)
p1: 120GB gpt windows7 64bit (EFI)
p2: 3TB gpt
( p3: 3TB (truecrypt volume) )
p4: DVD
I installed win7 via efi first (with other disks unplugged)
Now I tried several things (with all disks but
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:20 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> Cool, well glad to see that is being dealt with. No takers for the GDM
> problem?
Not sure about that one, haven't seen it on either of my systems. They
both log me in successfully every time.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
On 10/12/2011 12:38 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Erinn Looney-Triggs gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
>> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
>> and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mea
Welcome to Fedora and the BugZapper team , thank you for contributing.
- Original Message -
From: "Mohan R"
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2011 2:14:50 PM
Subject: New BugZapper Introduction
Hi,
Thanks for providing a way to contribute back to linux commun
Erinn Looney-Triggs gmail.com> writes:
> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
> and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mean three
> weeks ago). Now I can see in /etc/grub2.cf
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 11:52 -0800, Erinn Looney-Triggs wrote:
> One is a little silly, the other is a pain.
>
> The easy one:
>
> Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
> it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
> and blah is a very
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:35 -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 06:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:17 -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> >> Beta 16 on Dell E1405 is borderline unusable because of screen
> >> dimming.
>
> I did an update this morning, and it is a lot bette
Hi,
Thanks for providing a way to contribute back to linux community. I am
Mohan, from chennai, India.
I can say I am a person who can go through C code and learn how it
works. Currently I'm getting deeper into glib, gio, gtk and frameworks
based on those libraries like gstreamer, NetworkManager
One is a little silly, the other is a pain.
The easy one:
Why does GRUB2 still echo back an older version of the kernel, the menu
it puts up has the right number, but after selecting it it says booting
and blah is a very old kernel number (by very old I mean three
weeks ago). Now I can see in /e
During Final blocker review meetings, we've come up against a couple of
bugsto do with missing translations that we'd like to consider for Final
blocker status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706756
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676488
however we don't currently actuall
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:46:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 01:11 -0700, Ralf Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > It's nfs-server.service .
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot. That got me on the right track.
> > I still had a bit of a struggle, for two reason
On 10/11/2011 06:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 16:17 -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
>> Beta 16 on Dell E1405 is borderline unusable because of screen
>> dimming.
I did an update this morning, and it is a lot better.
There is still some weird brightness flickering when hitting
th
===
#fedora-meeting: proventesters (2011-10-12)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 18:00:38 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-10-12/proventesters.2011-10-12-18.00.lo
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:36:13 -0400
"Clyde E. Kunkel" wrote:
> I cannot attend this meeting but would like to request that
> consideration be given to changing the "Fedora NN updates-testing
> report" to list the actual package/software requiring security or
> critical path testing. I used to
On 10/11/2011 04:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> We are going to be having another proventesters meetup tomorrow on IRC
> in #fedora-meeting at 18:00UTC.
>
> Purpose of meetup: Brainstorm ideas on improving testing and processes
> for testing updates.
>
> * Intro/gather more agenda items
>
> * Recruiti
On 10/12/2011 11:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
>>> stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
>>
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13492
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-14164
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-13947
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-1
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:30 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > I think b) sounds closer to our goal here, if it does actually work that
> > way (I thought yum would just pick one of the obsoleting packages).
> > Peter?
>
> It will only pick up the replacement package if the package has a
> provides
On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:20:41 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> If you can successfully install, please give karma to:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lorax-16.4.6-1.fc16
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/parted-3.0-3.fc16
Looks like I missed the anaconda link to bodhi and put the lorax
On 10/12/2011 06:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> I can think of two ways to convince yum to always install grub-efi on
>> upgrades:
>> a) have grub2 require grub-efi; or
>> b) have grub-efi obsolete grub.
Both of the cases are also descri
Adam Williamson wrote on Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:00:03 -0700:
>i.e. if you decide to maintain your config by hand then you have to try
>and stop your distro doing it for you, and that's outside of the
>distro's scope of support.
I have more than 150 entries in /etc/alternatives that represent explici
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
>> > stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
> > stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
> > subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 yo
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 17:54 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> Is there some sort of suspend set up as a default for F16? I'm getting
> kicked out of idle SSH sessions and Apache stops responding at the same time.
Yes. Well, it's a bug, but it's not fixed yet. I think there's a dconf
key you
Is there some sort of suspend set up as a default for F16? I'm getting kicked
out of idle SSH sessions and Apache stops responding at the same time.
Fred
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
I was just installing fedora 16 beta, and when I ran first boot,
I tried to tell it to use NTP and point at our local NTP servers.
The first boot process then gagged, apparently because it was
trying to run ntpdate which was not installed (f16 uses chrony
by default now).
--
test mailing list
test
Compose started at Wed Oct 12 08:16:19 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Thanks for the help!
Bug filled at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745454 :)
--
Pedro
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 23:24 +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> > Network Manager applet faulty (forgets previously added connections)
> > on 3
Hi!
I've a less common 3G pen (yay for Vodafone exclusives) which requires
`ifconfig usb0 -arp` to work properly.
I've filled both a bug on Ubuntu and Fedora. On Ubuntu I've been told
it's a kernel issue; on Fedora, I've been said nothing.
Since I've connected each bug on each bugtracker to the oth
On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
> stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
> subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
> grub-efi installed or else your system wo
On 10/12/2011 06:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> Anybody else seeing anything like this? Known issue? Open bug?
>
> I'd say it's a 'known issue' in the sense that every freaking 'desktop
> search' mechanism I've ever come across has b
Hey Adam,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
> stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
> subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
> grub-efi installed o
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 15:34 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>> Sorry if this has been covered already, I just turned my list
>> subscription back on.
>>
>> Gnucash just segfaulted on me. It clearly shows the segfault
>> in /var/log/messages a
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-08 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>
>> Anybody else seeing anything like this? Known issue? Open bug?
>
> I'd say it's a 'known issue' in the sense that every freaking 'desktop
> search' mechanism I've ever come acro
42 matches
Mail list logo
