-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/09/11 21:54, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:32 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
>>
>>
>> Something is going on with gnome-shell. Mine progressively goes
>> form normal to 50% CPU, over a few hours. End result is a fairly
>> choppy
After the todays morning updates having a heavy problem with gnome-sessions:
Each time I touch the Activities button (screen top left), my gnome
session dies with "Oh no, something goes wrong...". I can reproduce this!
Creating a new user, this user shows the "Avctivities" drop down menu
properly
On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> =
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-6.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-5.3.8-1.fc15,php-eaccelerator-0.9.6.1-9.fc15,maniadrive-1.2-32.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3.3-1.f
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.10-7.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.3.3-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pl-5.10.2-5.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stunnel-
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.4.4-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cups-1.4.8-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mongoose-3.0-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 00:54 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> I did backup and started prupgrade. I do not expect problems due to
> the fact that F15 and F16 are very similar when it comes to versions
> of programs that I use. It seems to me that this is low risk update, I
> hope that there will b
2011/9/6 Adam Williamson :
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 22:24 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2011/9/6 Tim Flink :
>> > Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
>> >
>> > Tim
>>
>> I looked at that list and have not noticed any "glibc/gcc/* can
>> corrupt your *" p
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 22:24 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/9/6 Tim Flink :
> > Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
> >
> > Tim
>
> I looked at that list and have not noticed any "glibc/gcc/* can
> corrupt your *" problems. I wonder how much would be
Hi,
2011/9/6 Tim Flink :
> Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
>
> Tim
I looked at that list and have not noticed any "glibc/gcc/* can
corrupt your *" problems. I wonder how much would be safe for me to
update to F16? I use my server for web development - php things
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 12:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:19 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> > Probably we should just build the staging driver, because I seriously do
> > not have any desire to implement emulation of MMX through whatever SSE
> > we're on now. Life's too
On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> =
On 09/07/2011 01:07 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> =
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 11:19 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> Probably we should just build the staging driver, because I seriously do
> not have any desire to implement emulation of MMX through whatever SSE
> we're on now. Life's too short to use real mode.
does the staging driver have a matching X
Whoops, I forgot to send these out on Friday. Sorry for the delay.
Tim
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F16-blocker-review
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-09-02/f16-beta-blocker-review-2.2011-09-02
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Still broken compared with F-16+updates:
72 builds
Fixed packages compared with F-16+updates:
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 00:41 +0200, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to a kernel bug in uvcvideo module [1] Fedora 16 doesn't work
> properly with specific web camera model(s) (at least available in Asus
> N43S series). It's required to blacklist that module in
> /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.c
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 14:54 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:32 -0400, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> >
> >
> > Something is going on with gnome-shell. Mine progressively goes form
> > normal to 50% CPU, over a few hours. End result is a fairly choppy
> > desktop until reloaded (A
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 13:58 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Well, no version of Windows yet sets up a GPT disk label, and anaconda
> > is supposed to leave existing MSDOS disk labels around.
>
> Are you sure about this?
Of course not!
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 10:53 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> AutoQA:
> 1. We will decommission initscripts test, because Fedora 14 EOL is nearing
> and systemd replaced sysvinit in later releases.
systemd may have replaced upstart, but many packages are still using
sysv-style init scripts, not system
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 06:06 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> The 64 bit DVD install panics.
> F16 installed from the 64 bit live CD updated to a
> broken Gnome desktop.
>
> Time for a respin?
How would a respin help with something that happens post-update?
There will likely be a TC2
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 12:12 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Whereas with F16 Alpha I only saw minor corruption occasionally, such as
> http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/tmp/screenshot-f16-alpha-damage1.png
>
> since a few days ago suddenly the entire desktop gets corrupted
> spontaneously. That m
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 13:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 09:02:17 AM Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:57:01AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > libcap provides posix capabilities support - fair question would be
> >
> > how to get a list of applications which use libcap stuff it provides.
> >
> > rpm
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 22:04 +0800, TOE Physics wrote:
> [ 166.329] (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Version 3.0
> [ 166.329] (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 7872 kB
> [ 166.329] (II) VESA(0): VESA VBE OEM: Intel(R)Oaktrail Graphics
> Chipset Accelerated VGA BIOS
GMA600 (Oaktrail) is, like Poulsbo,
On 09/05/2011 10:56 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
>> Also a ps with the right options (which I can never remember :-)
>> will show you the full command line which might have arguments
>> that provide a clue.
>
> 'ps auxww' will get you what you need.
On 09/06/2011 07:57 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> I suspect someone has or has written a tool to catalog these things -
>
> anyone?
# lsof | grep libcap.so
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 08:57:01AM -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> libcap provides posix capabilities support - fair question would be
> how to get a list of applications which use libcap stuff it provides.
>
> rpm -q -l libcap
>
> shows these are provided:
>
> /lib64/libcap.so.2
> /lib64/l
> On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
>> I need guidance. I've installed the F14 libcap from updates-testing.
>> I have no idea if it works or how to test it--it doesn't appear to
>> "break" anything as far as normal operation of my system. Is that
>> good enough to give
Compose started at Tue Sep 6 08:15:03 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
Hi,
I've just installed F16 Beta into virtual machine, and I'm unable
to finish the post install configuration - I'm stuck at the Date
and Time configuration screen and clicking Next does nothing ...
looking at the process list, what seems suspicious to me is:
[smoltSendProfil]
has anyone m
On 9/6/2011 3:50 PM, Anoop Kammaran wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just got a new Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E420. I first tried installing from
> the GNOME live cd. However, I found that I cannot enable the Wireless
> Networking. It keeps saying that its unavailable. Then I tried the DVD image
> and when I chos
On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 23:14 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I need guidance. I've installed the F14 libcap from updates-testing.
> I have no idea if it works or how to test it--it doesn't appear to
> "break" anything as far as normal operation of my system. Is that
> good enough to give +1 karma
Hi all,
I just got a new Lenovo Thinkpad Edge E420. I first tried installing from
the GNOME live cd. However, I found that I cannot enable the Wireless
Networking. It keeps saying that its unavailable. Then I tried the DVD image
and when I chose the online Fedora repository for installation, it as
Sorry for the short notice everyone, but this week is Graphics Test Week
again. It's time to make sure the major graphics drivers are in shape
for Fedora 16. Tomorrow, 2011-09-06, is Nouveau Test Day [1]. Wednesday,
2011-09-07, is Radeon Test Day [2]. And Thursday, 2011-09-08, is Intel
graphics Tes
35 matches
Mail list logo
