on 09/03/2011 11:51 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Bug 735199 [1] is a beta blocker that causes intermittent problems with
> installers.
>
> I made a test boot.iso with the new dracut-013-8 package. It would be
> great if we could get some confirmation of the fix and karma for
> dracut [2].
>
> https://s
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
So it's meeting time again on Monday, except that it's a vacation in
both Canada and the U.S., so myself and Tim Flink, and perhaps some of
our North American community members, won't be present. If someone else
Bug 735199 [1] is a beta blocker that causes intermittent problems with
installers.
I made a test boot.iso with the new dracut-013-8 package. It would be
great if we could get some confirmation of the fix and karma for
dracut [2].
https://s3.amazonaws.com/fedoratestimages/dracut_20110902/boot-x86
Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Anybody has the same issue?
> Any ideas how to get grub installed properly...?
Many hours of work, my desktop computer is back. I don't care to do that
agian (and don't ask me what I did, because I couldn't say, in any sensible
order)!
--
tes
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 02:10:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:06 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > so if you have anaconda installed, you can
> > probably
> > > just remove it, remove fcoe-utils and
> > lldpad, and be happy.
> >
> > I
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 09:41 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after having updated to gdm-3.1.90-1 and gdm-plugin-fingerprint-3.1.90-1
> > the login fails (error: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong").
> >
> > Disabling the gnom
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:06 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > so if you have anaconda installed, you can
> probably
> > just remove it, remove fcoe-utils and
> lldpad, and be happy.
>
> I installed from alive CD, so I think that is
> why anaconda is installed, and henc
On 09/02/2011 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:02 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:53 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
>>> When I get past the current dracut/squashfs problems (BZ#735199)
>>> (workaround maxcpus=1 works for me). I only get a garbled grap
Adam Williamson wrote:
> so if you have anaconda installed, you can
probably
> just remove it, remove fcoe-utils and
lldpad, and be happy.
I installed from alive CD, so I think that is
why anaconda is installed, and hence, with
it, as you said, all of the other stuff.
I will uninstall as per
Joachim Backes wrote:
> after each kernel update I burn a boot cd
Explain how you do this!
It wastes a lot of CDs, but saves a lot of
wasted time trying to rescue a system.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:27 -0600, Peter Gueckel wrote:
> what is this lldpad daemonand why does it run
> continually for days on end without ever
> terminating and consume up to 65% of my
> laptop's cpu?
You probably don't need it; it's for enterprise stuff. fcoe-utils seems
to have grown a de
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Anybody has the same issue?
Yes, please HELP! :-)
I am unable to boot my desktop computer. I
just get a grub rescue command prompt and no
grub commands except set seem to be
recognized. I cannot boot into Fedora 15 or
Fedora 16 alpha.
I am trying to fix by running th
what is this lldpad daemonand why does it run
continually for days on end without ever
terminating and consume up to 65% of my
laptop's cpu?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Fri Sep 2 13:15:30 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 17:02 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:53 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> > When I get past the current dracut/squashfs problems (BZ#735199)
> > (workaround maxcpus=1 works for me). I only get a garbled graphical
> > screen so I cannot continue with the ins
Joachim Backes (joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de) said:
> Hi,
>
> after having updated to gdm-3.1.90-1 and
> gdm-plugin-fingerprint-3.1.90-1 the login fails (error: "Oh no!
> Something has gone wrong").
>
> Disabling the gnome-shell-extensions (as proposed) is useless in
> this situation.
>
> Anyb
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 09:27 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > The questions is how do we want to handle this? At least we should
> > release note this I guess, but perhaps we can do something smarter?
>
> Perhaps the first thing to do is to try to figure out if it's only me.
> Nobody else has gri
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 09:27:12 -0600,
Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>
> Nobody else has griped on the Rawhide front, but, then, I think I may be
> about the only Rawhide user left (and people keep telling me that I
> shouldn't be there either). If it's only me I'll figure out how to put
I use rawh
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 08:34:49 -0600, TF (Tim) wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727814
> True, both ways should work but it doesn't really seem that common of a
> use case since (we thought) most people would be either ignoring all of
> their encrypted partitions or using the
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:18:31 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Which is in essence the problem you are seeing here Jonathan, after
> my bluez update, your bluetooth dongle is actually being out into
> HCI mode, so that it can for example also be used to sync with your
> phone, use a bluetooth headset,
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 11:53 +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> When I get past the current dracut/squashfs problems (BZ#735199)
> (workaround maxcpus=1 works for me). I only get a garbled graphical
> screen so I cannot continue with the installation.
> anaconda textmode is no longer there and xdriver=ve
On Fri, 2 Sep 2011 02:27:15 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727814
> >
> > --- Comment #8 from Tim Flink 2011-09-01
> > 13:18:54 EDT --- Discussed in the 2011-08-26 blocker review
> > meeting. Rejected as a Fedora 16 beta blocker because it doesn't
On Fri, 2011-09-02 at 10:37 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after having updated to gdm-3.1.90-1 and gdm-plugin-fingerprint-3.1.90-1
> the login fails (error: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong").
>
> Disabling the gnome-shell-extensions (as proposed) is useless in this
> situation.
>
> A
Compose started at Fri Sep 2 08:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
When I get past the current dracut/squashfs problems (BZ#735199)
(workaround maxcpus=1 works for me). I only get a garbled graphical
screen so I cannot continue with the installation.
anaconda textmode is no longer there and xdriver=vesa gives the same
garbled screen.
All F16 alpha rc's and alpha
On 09/02/2011 11:01 AM, Tom H wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to boot
(file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the bootloader to
/dev/sda.
Anybody has the same issue?
Yes. Just happ
On 09/02/2011 10:51 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 09/02/2011 08:45 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to
boot (file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the
bootloader to /dev/sda.
Anybody has the same issue?
Confirm
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
>
> After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to boot
> (file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the bootloader to
> /dev/sda.
>
> Anybody has the same issue?
Yes. Just happened to me.
"/boot/grub2/" is a
On 09/02/2011 08:45 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to
> boot (file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the
> bootloader to /dev/sda.
>
> Anybody has the same issue?
Confirmed file a bug and add it to the blocker bug list
After having updated to grub2-1.99-1.fc16.x86_64, grub2 refuses to boot
(file not found). Getting rid from this by re-installing the bootloader
to /dev/sda.
Anybody has the same issue?
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatu
Hi,
after having updated to gdm-3.1.90-1 and gdm-plugin-fingerprint-3.1.90-1
the login fails (error: "Oh no! Something has gone wrong").
Disabling the gnome-shell-extensions (as proposed) is useless in this
situation.
Anybody has the same issue?
--
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.d
Dne 2.9.2011 07:33, Gerard Snitselaar napsal(a):
> My day job has been working with Unix since 2000 and mostly Linux since 2004,
> performing fault analysis of kernel dumps or determining if bugs are in our
> code or somewhere else in Red Hat, and fixing bugs in our code. So I spend a
> fair amount
32 matches
Mail list logo
