Having a file in my home called :0-greeter.log
If pressing "rm :", the bash completes:
rm :\:0-greeter.log
Two questions:
1. Why the : is escaped at second position?
2. Why the : is escaped at all?
That's a known issue?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smim
WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting
WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT)
WHERE: #fedora-meeting
Tomorrow (or today...) is QA meeting time again. This week's meeting
will be brought to you by j_dulaney, but I'm sending the announcement.
The agenda looks scarily like last week's because the test week got
push
On 08/29/2011 01:35 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it.
Now it's hitting me badly everytime I boot F16 Alpha. Sometimes the
second login attempt succeeds, sometimes it doesn't and needs
a third attempt.
gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Where do I
In the system-config-services, I see that sshd is not running when I boot the
computer.
The message at the top right says that:
"The sshd service is managed by systemd. It may be started then run in the
background, or be activated on demand..."
I am unclear about the "be activated on demand" p
On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 22:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it.
What exactly is the point of the "Oh no!" screen anyway?
Jon.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
Sometimes, if I try to reboot my box by the gnome-shell (user button top
right->poweroff->restart), the box hangs, and the reboot seems to fail.
In all these cases, I have to press the power button or the reset button.
On the other hand, rebooting from some tty (by ctrl+alt+del) *always*
proce
Still after the most recent updates on my box:
[
Aug 29 05:52:29 Updated: evolution-data-server-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:30 Installed: p11-kit-0.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:31 Updated: gnome-keyring-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:32 Updated: gnome-menus-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64
Aug 29 05:52:
> From: br...@wolff.to
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Should I make a tracking bug in fedora for problem reported upstream?
>
> I have reported https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862 for an
> issue with 3.1 kernels crashing, typically on the order of hours after
> bootin
Dne 28.8.2011 16:43, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a):
> I reported this upstream, since that seems to be a better place to get
> attention for development kernel bugs, than Fedora's tracker. However,
> if this should be considered a beta blocker, then I should probably also
> make a Fedora bug entry so t
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:02:16 +0200, MS (Michael) wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:46:30 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
>
> > On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > $ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
> > > firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> > > xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> > >
> > > crashes for me (and
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 23:46:30 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
> On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > $ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
> > firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> > xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> >
> > crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
> > to browse pages at
Tom H wrote:
> I wasn't implying that you had.
I never got the impression that you were implying that I had changed the file
:-)
I thought you were stating that I _must_ change the file to get the result I
wanted :-)
> I was only pointing out that some people - like me - do so
I looked at th
On 08/28/2011 11:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> $ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
> firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
> xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
>
> crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
> to browse pages at http://bikemap.net
>
> This is _without_ Adobe's Flash plugin in cas
$ rpm -q firefox xulrunner
firefox-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
xulrunner-6.0-1.fc16.x86_64
crashes for me (and opens its own crash handler dialog) when trying
to browse pages at http://bikemap.net
This is _without_ Adobe's Flash plugin in case that matters.
Can anyone confirm?
If so, the current test upd
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:12:27 -0400, PD (Patrick) wrote:
>
>> I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card.
>
> This is with Radeon HD 3450 (aka RV620).
>
>> Could you
>> review your messages logs for entries containing :
>> *
On Sun, 28 Aug 2011 16:12:27 -0400, PD (Patrick) wrote:
> I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card.
This is with Radeon HD 3450 (aka RV620).
> Could you
> review your messages logs for entries containing :
> * page flip
> * unable to schedule IB
> * wait for fifo failed
> ... as
Michael,
I've been having recent issues with a Radeon HD 2600 card. Could you
review your messages logs for entries containing :
* page flip
* unable to schedule IB
* wait for fifo failed
... associated with drm or radeon.
You might be having the same problem as myself
Pat.
On 08/28/2011 04
Never have seen this with F15. Only have read about it.
Now it's hitting me badly everytime I boot F16 Alpha. Sometimes the
second login attempt succeeds, sometimes it doesn't and needs
a third attempt.
gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Where do I search for meaningful error messages?
Attached .xe
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Peter G. wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>
>> (unless you change that default behavior in "/etc/default/grub")
>
> I didn't make any changes.
I wasn't implying that you had. I was only pointing out that some
people - like me - do so (on the few Debian and Ubuntu boxes tha
F16 installed from a composed tree just couple days ago (sync a full
tree + updates-testing locally), fully updated. The system, as a whole,
seems slow to respond to anything I do. If I click on the Fedora system
start menu, or navigate around it, that seems to be ok. But when
clicking on applic
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 14:55:15 +0200,
Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can't find qmake on my F16-Alpha box. The rpm
> qt-4.8.0-0.9.beta1.fc16.x86_64 is installed. I found qmake in F15 in
> /usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake, but it's not there in F16.
The short answer is qt-devel.
The long answer is:
Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Peter G. wrote:
>> - no rescue mode menu entry for the kernel-PAE was created
>
> Because grubby only creates one entry when a new kernel's installed;
> "grub2-mkconfig ..." creates a "regular" entry and a "single" one
I just ran grub2-mkconfig -
I have reported https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41862 for an
issue with 3.1 kernels crashing, typically on the order of hours after
booting. Based on some names in the traceback, I suspect this is MD raid
or luks related.
I reported this upstream, since that seems to be a better place
Hi,
can't find qmake on my F16-Alpha box. The rpm
qt-4.8.0-0.9.beta1.fc16.x86_64 is installed. I found qmake in F15 in
/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake, but it's not there in F16.
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Peter G. wrote:
>
> I installed (rpm -ivh) kernel-PAE on a Fedora 16α system.
> I changed /etc/sysconfig/kernel: DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-PAE
>
> The new kernel-PAE shows up in grub.cfg, but some things are not quite how
> they
> should be:
> - the menu entry for ke
25 matches
Mail list logo
