I installed (rpm -ivh) kernel-PAE on a Fedora 16α system.
I changed /etc/sysconfig/kernel: DEFAULTKERNEL=kernel-PAE
The new kernel-PAE shows up in grub.cfg, but some things are not quite how they
should be:
- the menu entry for kernel-PAE is not of the same format as the other lines
- the echo l
Dear FellowTesters:
I tried yesterday to take one of my qemu-kvm/libvirtd vm's which
was 30gb and loaded with XPSP3 and had 14GB free space and install
Fedora 16 alpha rc5. I encountered the following issues.
1. The shrink feature would not shrink the 30GB NTFS partition and
allow for in
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:50:39 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
>> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
>> >
>> >> > # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
>> >> > Installation finished. No error reported.
>> >>
>> >> AFAIK
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 19:49:54 +,
Andre Robatino wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes:
>
> > I was getting dependency errors trying to reinstall gnome-panel (which
> > brings in gnome-shell).
>
> That problem, I DO have - gnome-panel-3.1.5-3.fc17.x86_64 is one of the
> packages
>
Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes:
> I was getting dependency errors trying to reinstall gnome-panel (which
> brings in gnome-shell).
That problem, I DO have - gnome-panel-3.1.5-3.fc17.x86_64 is one of the packages
I couldn't install, and my current version is gnome-panel-3.0.2-3.fc16.x86_64
whic
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 18:48:48 -0400,
Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:43:59 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Um, exactly what you quoted. Larger updates tend to get more false
> > negative feedback. That's the main problem developers cite with them.
>
> Then it seems like the
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 19:31:31 +,
Andre Robatino wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by "broken" - for me, the original problem (trying
> to
> pull in 32-bit packages, and then failing due to conflicts) is gone now in F16
> and never appeared in Raw
Bruno Wolff III wolff.to> writes:
> Rawhide is broken today (and has been for a few days now), with regard to
> gnome-shell. You can grab the latest gnome-shell built for F16 and things
> work.
I'm not sure what you mean by "broken" - for me, the original problem (trying to
pull in 32-bit packag
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 16:59:22 +,
Andre Robatino wrote:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155799.html
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731617
>
> No progress in fixing it yet. Though I see roughly the same set of broken
> dependencies in Rawhide,
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 10:28:37 +0300,
Kalev Lember wrote:
> When in the past rawhide was always what you'd get as the next upcoming
> Fedora release, this is now slightly different. In the past, updates to
> rawhide would slow down significantly when nearing a new release and the
> repo would
On 08/27/2011 11:57 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I notice that things like /proc /sys aren't in /etc/fstab
> any longer (at least not on the f16 alpha I installed).
> Are they supposed to be gone now?
AFAIK, systemd is hardcoded to mount those now.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I notice that things like /proc /sys aren't in /etc/fstab
any longer (at least not on the f16 alpha I installed).
Are they supposed to be gone now?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Hongqing Yang wrote:
> Hi, Moore,
>
> You have to download the releases.txt file from
> http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt from that, you can find
> the installmirrorlist is not correct.
...snip...
It should in fact be correct now.
Please do
Michael Spahn wrote:
> In my opionion it's still a bug, the should be a notice what "Apply" mean.
I agree. I meant that I don't need any more hints or tips, because I have
solved
the problem and I now have ssh working. Clearly, as I was trying to get this
solved, we stumbled across a bug in th
Compose started at Sat Aug 27 13:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 07:50:39 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
> >
> >> > # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
> >> > Installation finished. No error reported.
> >>
> >> AFAIK, this won't be bootable, unless grub-install has run
> >> success
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:12:13PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> >
>> > I now have my own, very small page, which is Fedora centric at
>> > present...
>> >
>> > http://home.roadrunner.com/~c
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
>
>> > # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
>> > Installation finished. No error reported.
>>
>> AFAIK, this won't be bootable, unless grub-install has run
>> successfully be
In my opionion it's still a bug, the should be a notice what "Apply" mean.
Am 27.08.2011 01:59, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> # ip(6)tables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
>> # ACCEPT
>> run "systemctl restart iptables.service" and
>> "systemctl rest
19 matches
Mail list logo
