- Original Message -
> From: "Hongqing Yang"
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Cc: "Bryan Moore"
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2011 1:46:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: preupgrade-main
> Hi, Moore,
>
> You have to download the
Hi, Moore,
You have to download the releases.txt file from
http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/releases.txt
from that, you can find the installmirrorlist is not correct.
You can download it to local and modify it to the right path. then run
preupgrade - /path/to/releases.txt
It will works, but ther
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:31 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 10:49 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > Up until F16 (and it *might* have done it once during the early alpha
> > testing stages), windows has been detected and included in grub during
> > install. But the last few instal
On 08/24/2011 02:43 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, another criteria discussion. It came up during Alpha
> that we're grievously lacking criteria to ensure kickstart installs
> work. So, we should kick that around a bit, I guess...
>
> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extr
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # ip(6)tables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
> # ACCEPT
> run "systemctl restart iptables.service" and
> "systemctl restart ip6tables.service"
This works.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fe
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 19:22 -0400, Marty Felkler wrote:
> I could not isntall GRUB to the boot partition on my second drive
> /dev/sdb2. The only way was to install to MBR on /dev/sda. This was
This will no longer be an issue as of the first beta test compose. To
get grub2 installed on sdb2 yo
Marty Felkler wrote:
> you can use the command
> "grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg" to create grub.cfg
grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
> you have to hand edit to grub.cfg to make the other entries.
create other entries in /boot/grub2/custom.cfg
don't hand edit grub.cfg at all
--
te
I could not isntall GRUB to the boot partition on my second drive
/dev/sdb2. The only way was to install to MBR on /dev/sda. This was
kinda a bummer since it wiped out my TereabyteUnilimted Boot Manager
making Windows, openSUSE and Ubuntu unbootable. Will try to either
install GRUB on /dev/
Peter G. wrote:
> I guess thatś because I restarted after I came back from the body shop.
Yes, your iptables/ip6tables settings get loaded by the
iptables/ip6tables service upon boot-up. You can get the same effect as
running "systemctl restart iptables.service" and "systemctl restart
ip6tables
Michael Spahn wrote:
> Bug is opened, feel free to add a comment.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733778
>
> Regards
>
> Michael
Thanks. I was going to do that after I get back from a jog :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fed
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Peter G. wrote:
>> iptables -L does now show an ssh entry. Does this also do ipv6 (or would
>> I ever need to deal with this in an ipv6 situation, down the road?)?
>
> No. You will want ip6tables for that.
Odd. I just checked /etc/sysconfig/ip6tables and there is thi
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> The apply button in system-config-firewall should apply the firewall
> settings. He shouldn't need to reboot or reload the iptables rules.
That's what I thought. That's why it says apply. Apply means to put into being,
now.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> I assume you have rebooted after changing firewall rules
no. I didn't. Linux folklore states that rebooing is not necessary
> and/or issued:
>
> # systemctl restart iptables.service
I didn know I had to.
> If so, then I dunno
but I do... now.
--
test maili
> When I boot my computer, it shows the list of kernels that are installed
> and
could be used... I take the default of kernel-3.1.0-rc3.git0.0.fc17.
x86_64!
Grub2 tells me that I am booting from kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 ...
I am just curious as of why the discr
Peter G. wrote:
> iptables -L does now show an ssh entry. Does this also do ipv6 (or would I
> ever
> need to deal with this in an ipv6 situation, down the road?)?
No. You will want ip6tables for that.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject
Heads-up, everyone: we agreed at the meeting on Monday to look into
bumping TC1 up the schedule to next Wednesday, replacing the 'rawhide
acceptance' test point. I checked with releng and anaconda team at
today's blocker review meeting and they were both happy with the idea,
so that's what we're go
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>I assume you have rebooted after changing firewall rules and/or issued:
>
> # systemctl restart iptables.service
>
> If so, then I dunno
The apply button in system-config-firewall should apply the firewall
settings. He shouldn't need to reboot or reload the iptable
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j
> # ACCEPT
>
> As Michael said, system-config-firewall has a bug. You two should file a
> bug against it.
Thanks for all the help. I hope this will now work. I will try it in a couple
of
hours...
Bug is opened, feel free to add a comment.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733778
Regards
Michael
Am 26.08.2011 21:04, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Spahn wrote:
>
>> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
>>
>> I actually don't know why but I always had to disab
On 08/26/2011 02:55 PM, Peter G. wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> # iptables -L | grep ssh
>> ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywherestate NEW
>> tcp dpt:ssh
>
> You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
> I see that ssh is nowhere
Dear Tom H.
I must apologize, I do not know where to find the grub2.conf file?
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
From: Tom H
To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <
test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 04:30:39 -0400
Subject: Re: grub2 weirdness
On Fri, Aug 26,
Does it put the correct rules in iptable.safe? Might be a systemd problem of
restarting with the new rules. Does it work after a reboot?
Jan
--
Jan H Wildeboer|
EMEA Open Source Affairs | Office: +49 (0)89 205071-207
Red Hat GmbH | Mobile: +49 (0)174 33 23
Michael Spahn wrote:
> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
>
> I actually don't know why but I always had to disable the whole firewall.
I never had to disable the firewall in f13 or f14 or f15 for ssh (only for nfs,
which I no longer use, because of that and other reas
Peter G. wrote:
> You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
> I see that ssh is nowhere in the output, so how could grep ssh ever return
> anything?
My command was an example of when a firewall rule existed to allow ssh
through.
>
> But, when I examine /etc/s
Michael Spahn wrote:
> I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
You should file a bug...
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> # iptables -L | grep ssh
> ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywherestate NEW
> tcp dpt:ssh
You know, I just tried your command again, but this time without grepping, and
I see that ssh is nowhere in the output, so how could grep ssh ever return
Hello,
I learned that the firewall system-config tool doesn't work.
I actually don't know why but I always had to disable the whole firewall.
Regards
Michael
Am 26.08.2011 20:40, schrieb Peter G.:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> netstat lists network port information. It does not know about
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> netstat lists network port information. It does not know about or list
> firewall configuration information.
>
> iptables is the command-line tool to view, add, delete, or change
> firewall rules.
>
> # iptables -L# lists default table rules
>
> # iptables -L |
Peter G. wrote:
> Doesn't that mean the firewall is open on port 22 (for both ipv4/6, even)?
netstat lists network port information. It does not know about or list
firewall configuration information.
iptables is the command-line tool to view, add, delete, or change
firewall rules.
# iptables -
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 10:49 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Up until F16 (and it *might* have done it once during the early alpha
> testing stages), windows has been detected and included in grub during
> install. But the last few installs haven't included it and not included
> on my current install
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:12:13PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > I now have my own, very small page, which is Fedora centric at
> > present...
> >
> > http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/grub2.html
> >
> > So far, it only covers editing /
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Is the firewall on both machines configure to allow port 22 through?
I think so. I unclicked and reclicked ssh in the firewall configuration, then
apply.
Then I restarted sshd.service on both computers and on both computers netstat
showed:
tcp0 0 0.0.
Peter G. wrote:
> What is happening? How can I get the computers to communicate?
Is the firewall on both machines configure to allow port 22 through?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 11:47:15 -0400, TH (Tom) wrote:
> > # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
> > Installation finished. No error reported.
>
> AFAIK, this won't be bootable, unless grub-install has run
> successfully before, because that all that the above commands are
> doing is popu
I have fedora 16α installed on both computers.
The two computers are connected to one another via a router.
They can ping one another.
sshd is running on both computers.
# netstat -tulpn | grep :22
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 11865/sshd
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:33:59AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In my defence, I don't run Ubuntu or anything
Compose started at Fri Aug 26 13:15:30 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:33:59AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >> In my defence, I don't run Ubuntu or anything evil like that. I just
> >> cargo-cult things I vaguely rememb
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 17:18 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:20:54 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:59 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > > Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something mu
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> Up until F16 (and it *might* have done it once during the early alpha
> testing stages), windows has been detected and included in grub during
> install. But the last few installs haven't included it and not included
> on my current insta
Up until F16 (and it *might* have done it once during the early alpha
testing stages), windows has been detected and included in grub during
install. But the last few installs haven't included it and not included
on my current install.
No parititioning changes have taken place, no hardrives have
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:18:56 +0200, me wrote:
>
>> Doesn't work for me.
>
> # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true /dev/sda3
> Installation finished. No error reported.
>
> # grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
> Installation f
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:18:56 +0200, me wrote:
> Doesn't work for me.
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true /dev/sda3
Installation finished. No error reported.
# grub2-install --grub-setup=/bin/true '(hd0,3)'
Installation finished. No error reported.
--
Fedora release 16 (Verne) - Linux 3.0.1-
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:18:56 +0200
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Installation finished. No error reported.
Actually, it did work. Try doing the boot.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:20:54 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:59 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
> > > worse with regard to installing GRUB to
I wrote and packaged a small library to work with the URL shortener
that we're planning to start using with AutoQA.
If someone could do the review on that library, it would be much
appreciated:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733692
Thanks,
Tim
signature.asc
Description: PGP si
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> In my defence, I don't run Ubuntu or anything evil like that. I just
>> cargo-cult things I vaguely remember from Google searches. That's much
>> better, right?
>
> We'd f
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:47:18PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:27 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >
> > Note the earlier exchange of emails. update_grub is an Ubuntu command.
>
> In my defence, I don't run Ubuntu or anything evil like that. I just
> cargo-cult things
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:15 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > yum --setopt="protected_multilib=0" blah blah blah
> >
> > which might help in situations where things are already deeply sideways.
>
> worth noting for the record that, as always when using 'force' type
> parameters to a package
On 08/26/2011 02:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> In the long term, yeah, btrfs will have support for everything that
> makes LVM (and soft RAID, in fact) interesting. Probably be F18 before
> we really stop using LVM and RAID separately from the filesystem by
> default, though (that's just a WAG).
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 12:14 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 11:00 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> > While trying to get sound working on F16 by unmuting with alsamixer.
> > Alsamixer just segfaults and dumps core (BZ #731277).
> >
> > This is on F16 alpha x86_64 with all selective updates w
On 08/26/2011 11:00 AM, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
While trying to get sound working on F16 by unmuting with alsamixer.
Alsamixer just segfaults and dumps core (BZ #731277).
This is on F16 alpha x86_64 with all selective updates working around
current update issues.
Anybody got a working alsamixer?
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Tom H gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> That must be the result of grubby duplicating a menuentry stanza when
>> a new kernel's installed because the stanzas have "echo ..."
>> statements that are probably not being updated when grubby creates a
>>
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Fpasted to http://fpaste.org/4rXr/ - Gmane complains about lines longer than
> 80
> characters.
Ignore that - just made it an attachment to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732654 .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520038
Tom H gmail.com> writes:
> That must be the result of grubby duplicating a menuentry stanza when
> a new kernel's installed because the stanzas have "echo ..."
> statements that are probably not being updated when grubby creates a
> new entry.
>
> Could you post your grub.cfg?
Fpasted to http:/
While trying to get sound working on F16 by unmuting with alsamixer.
Alsamixer just segfaults and dumps core (BZ #731277).
This is on F16 alpha x86_64 with all selective updates working around
current update issues.
Anybody got a working alsamixer?
Jurgen
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:27 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:05:55PM -0600, Peter G. wrote:
>> > Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >
>> > > did you run 'update_grub'?
>> >
>> > no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:55 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Rob Healey gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When I boot my computer, it shows the list of kernels that are installed and
> could be used... I take the default of kernel-3.1.0-rc3.git0.0.fc17.x86_64!
> Grub2 tells me that I am booting from kernel-3
On 08/26/2011 10:06 AM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Rob Healey wrote:
Greetings:
When I boot my computer, it shows the list of kernels that are installed and
could be used... I take the default of kernel-3.1.0-rc3.git0.0.fc17.x86_64!
Grub2 tells me that I am booting from kernel-3.
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> When I boot my computer, it shows the list of kernels that are installed and
> could be used... I take the default of kernel-3.1.0-rc3.git0.0.fc17.x86_64!
> Grub2 tells me that I am booting from kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 ...
>
> I am just
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:47 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
>
> > Any change grub2-efi will make it into F16 or is this F17 material?
>
> F17. We need to port a pile of fixes to grub2 first.
>
Ah, thanks. Too bad though, grub2-efi wo
Rob Healey gmail.com> writes:
> When I boot my computer, it shows the list of kernels that are installed and
could be used... I take the default of kernel-3.1.0-rc3.git0.0.fc17.x86_64!
Grub2 tells me that I am booting from kernel-3.0.1-3.fc16.x86_64 ...
>
> I am just curious as of why the disc
On 08/25/2011 08:12 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> I've worked my way through this kind of mess a couple of times now, most
> recently yesterday. Here's my experience:
>
> - Do a big rawhide update - in this case, at least two weeks worth.
A bit off topic, but I would personally encourage everybo
63 matches
Mail list logo
