On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 21:27 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:05:55PM -0600, Peter G. wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > did you run 'update_grub'?
> >
> > no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
> > explain it. but I learned something and I think I
> > pre
Greetings:
For once I am not writing regarding an issue that I am having with Fedora!
Yeah for me...
I am just curious about one thing...
1) I loaded my box from the F16-Alpha x86_64 Desktop live cd...
2) disabled updates-testing repo
3) complete update using only Fedora
4) enabled updates-test
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 19:13 -0600, Peter G. wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>
> > The default Fedora install, up to now, has been to have a separate
> > "/boot" in order to use LVM for "/". That's one reason and there are
> > others (for example, some people don't mount "/boot" at boot; they
> > only mount
# F16 Beta Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-08-26
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
The first Beta blocker review meeting starts at 17:00 UTC in
#fedora-bugzappers. We'll do a first run through the proposed Beta
blocke
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 07:05:55PM -0600, Peter G. wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > did you run 'update_grub'?
>
> no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
> explain it. but I learned something and I think I
> prefer the custom.cfg method, anyway :-)
Note the earlier exchange of emai
Tom H wrote:
> The default Fedora install, up to now, has been to have a separate
> "/boot" in order to use LVM for "/". That's one reason and there are
> others (for example, some people don't mount "/boot" at boot; they
> only mount it to update the kernel and the boot config and then
> unmount
Peter G. wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> did you run 'update_grub'?
>
> no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
> explain it. but I learned something and I think
I
> prefer the custom.cfg method, anyway :-)
>
I don't seem to have that program, or if I do,
it's not in my/root's pat
Adam Williamson wrote:
> did you run 'update_grub'?
no I didn't. first I heard of it. that might
explain it. but I learned something and I think I
prefer the custom.cfg method, anyway :-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
On 08/26/2011 12:00 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:54 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>> I'm still on the opinion that we should not be adding an ks testing to
>> the alpha criteria.
>>
>> Cant we just create a set of most commonly ks use cases in ks files for
>> rele
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 23:54 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> I'm still on the opinion that we should not be adding an ks testing to
> the alpha criteria.
>
> Cant we just create a set of most commonly ks use cases in ks files for
> releng and they can use pungi to test it with and post t
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 18:54 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:21 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > > Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > >
> >
> > did you run 'update_grub'? it seems to be needed after chan
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:49 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Well I was trying to suggest something that wasn't handy-wavy. At some
> point a set of criteria are going to be needed for what is expected
> out anaconda at the minimum. From that criteria a set of test
> kickstarts can be built. I
On 08/25/2011 10:49 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 16:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:25, Chris Lumens wrote:
> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely comple
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 03:16:25PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:21 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> > Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> >
>
> did you run 'update_grub'? it seems to be needed after changing grub2
> config. just like lilo! ahh, the good old days.
You me
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 16:20, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:25, Chris Lumens wrote:
>> >> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex
>> >> kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broad
#237: tests to verify that torrents and mirrors contain signed checksum files
---+
Reporter: robatino | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wi
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:59 -0500, David Lehman wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
> > worse with regard to installing GRUB to a partition's primary sector.
> > Partitioning hasn't changed.
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:35 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:25, Chris Lumens wrote:
> >> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex
> >> kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broadly what we'd need to do
> >> is define a subset of kickstart
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 12:21 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> > I have installed F16α and with it grub2 to the MBR of /dev/sda. I am
> > experimenting happily with F16, but I am unable to add F15 to the
> > grub2 boot menu.
> >
> > I have edited /etc/grub.d/40_c
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:55 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:28 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:20:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > > > Dunno if that helps anybody... never a dull moment...
> > >
> > > When upgrading rawhide from X - use screen
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:12 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:08:52 -0400
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > > Error: Protected multilib versions:
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
> > >
> >
> > I have no idea what these er
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
>> I have installed F16α and with it grub2 to the MBR of /dev/sda. I am
>> experimenting happily with F16, but I am unable to add F15 to the
>> grub2 boot menu.
>>
>> I have edited /etc/grub.d/40_custom an
#237: tests to verify that torrents and mirrors contain signed checksum files
--+-
Reporter: robatino | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: Wiki
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>> In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
>>>
>>> In the old grub.conf it even states:
>>>
>>> "all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /"
>>>
>>> That means everything is relative to root (/), not /b
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>
> So if, for example, (hd0,0) is the grub name for
> a dedicated /boot partition, then the file names
> you use would be relative to /boot (just say /initramfs...)
>
> On the othr hand if (hd0,2) is the grub name for
> the "/" root partition, a
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 22:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
> worse with regard to installing GRUB to a partition's primary sector.
> Partitioning hasn't changed. TC1 managed to install GRUB to /dev/sda3.
> Anaconda now repor
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 04:11 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there a way to workaround this in a kickstart file (other than running
>>> grub2-install --force (hd0,0) in %post) by using partiti
Between TC1 and release of F16 Alpha, something must have changed to the
worse with regard to installing GRUB to a partition's primary sector.
Partitioning hasn't changed. TC1 managed to install GRUB to /dev/sda3.
Anaconda now reports failure to install, and I've found this on virtual
console:
/
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:26:15PM +0200, Jurgen Kramer wrote:
> Any change grub2-efi will make it into F16 or is this F17 material?
F17. We need to port a pile of fixes to grub2 first.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 14:25, Chris Lumens wrote:
>> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex
>> kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broadly what we'd need to do
>> is define a subset of kickstart functionality that we expect to work,
>> and then possibly divide that
> kickstart is a very broad area; you can write extremely complex
> kickstart files that do a lot of stuff. So broadly what we'd need to do
> is define a subset of kickstart functionality that we expect to work,
> and then possibly divide that up by release phase (so some stuff must
> work by Beta,
Scott Robbins wrote:
> Important note. Although disk number still begins at 0, partitions
now begin at 1. So /dev/sda1 is now hd0,1.
Thanks for the reminder :-)
I was already aware of that, hence I set root to 0,7 (ie., sda7, or grub
legacy hd0,6).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedorapro
Scott Robbins wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:21:37PM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium
wrote:
>> > I have edited /etc/grub.d/40_custom and run grub2-mkconfig -o
>> > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, but my F15 entry never shows up in the
menu, even though it is in grub.cfg.
> Interesting. I just tested
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:10:36 -0400
Scott Robbins wrote:
> Important note. Although disk number still begins at 0, partitions now
> begin at 1. So /dev/sda1 is now hd0,1.
My God! I won't be able to handle the partition numbers matching
in linux and grub (but that's OK I couldn't handle them not
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:21:37PM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> >
> > I have edited /etc/grub.d/40_custom and run grub2-mkconfig -o
> > /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, but my F15 entry never shows up in the menu,
> > even though it is in grub.cfg.
Interesting. I ju
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:52:18PM -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:15:56 -0600
> Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> > How are you supposed to tell grub2 to look into the /boot directory
> > for the kernel and initram?
>
> OK, to inject my own ignorance into this thread:
>
> As f
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 14:28 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:20:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > > Dunno if that helps anybody... never a dull moment...
> >
> > When upgrading rawhide from X - use screen.
>
> and also when upgrading from ssh.
>
> things have definit
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 12:15:56 -0600
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> How are you supposed to tell grub2 to look into the /boot directory
> for the kernel and initram?
OK, to inject my own ignorance into this thread:
As far as I know, the paths you tell grub should be
relative to whatever the heck (
Jonathan Corbet (corbet...@lwn.net) said:
> - Somewhere in the middle, while I'm not looking, the update kills the
>running session and/or X server - I come back to a login screen. It
>used to be safe to run "yum update" from a terminal window, but,
>seemingly, not anymore. Not real
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 02:20:12PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > Dunno if that helps anybody... never a dull moment...
>
> When upgrading rawhide from X - use screen.
and also when upgrading from ssh.
things have definitely gotten a lot more fragile over the last
release or two.
Da
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> I have installed F16α and with it grub2 to the MBR of /dev/sda. I am
> experimenting happily with F16, but I am unable to add F15 to the
> grub2 boot menu.
>
> I have edited /etc/grub.d/40_custom and run grub2-mkconfig -o
> /boot/grub2/grub.cfg, but my F15 entry neve
Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 04:36 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>> Joachim Backes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> my grub.cfg (using chainloader) entry for F15 (after installing
grub2
>> in
>>> F15 and installing then in F15 the grub2 bootloader to /dev/sda7):
>>>
>>> menuentry 'Fedora 15' --class f
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:12 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:08:52 -0400
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > > Error: Protected multilib versions:
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
> > > gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
> > >
> >
> > I have no idea what these er
Tom H wrote:
>> In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
>>
>> In the old grub.conf it even states:
>>
>> "all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /"
>>
>> That means everything is relative to root (/), not /boot!
>
> Are you referring to root=/ or the grub root?
>
I don't have a
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Petrus de Calguarium
wrote:
> Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, everything is relative to /boot. No change from old
>> grub.
>
> In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
>
> In the old grub.conf it even states:
>
> "all kernel and initrd pa
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:08:52 -0400
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Error: Protected multilib versions:
> > gnome-panel-libs-3.1.5-2.fc16.x86_64 !=
> > gnome-panel-libs-3.0.2-3.fc16.i686
> >
>
> I have no idea what these errors mean or how to fix them.
> Any advice would be appreciated. Actually, t
On 08/25/2011 12:40 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, everything is relative to /boot. No change from old
>> grub.
>
> In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
>
> In the old grub.conf it even states:
>
> "all kernel and initrd paths are rel
On 08/25/2011 05:52 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:43, Joachim Backes
wrote:
Hi,
in an almost empty system (only running gnome-shell), I see CPU peaks all 20
seconds (kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64). It seems that gnome-shell
is busy all 20 secs (similar eff
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> As far as I know, everything is relative to /boot. No change from old
> grub.
In the old grub, you had to explicitly state /boot.
In the old grub.conf it even states:
"all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /"
That means everything is relative to root (/), not /b
Compose started at Thu Aug 25 13:15:36 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 09:43, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in an almost empty system (only running gnome-shell), I see CPU peaks all 20
> seconds (kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64). It seems that gnome-shell
> is busy all 20 secs (similar effect like yesterday with
> kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.gi
Hi,
in an almost empty system (only running gnome-shell), I see CPU peaks
all 20 seconds (kernel-3.1.0-0.rc3.git0.0.fc16.x86_64). It seems that
gnome-shell is busy all 20 secs (similar effect like yesterday with
kernel-3.1.0-0.rc2.git7.2.fc16.x86_64 and Xorg).
Somebody has an explanation for
On 08/25/2011 04:11 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> Is there a way to workaround this in a kickstart file (other than running
>> grub2-install --force (hd0,0) in %post) by using partitioning/boatloader
>> options?
>
> Just in case "(hd0,0)" isn't a ty
On 08/25/2011 10:35 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
>> On 08/25/2011 12:40 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>>>
>>> set root=(hd0,7)
>>> linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64 root=/dev/sda7 ro quiet
> etc
>>> etc etc etc etc rd.=0 etc etc etc
>>> initrd /boot/ini
Works great.
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 14:15 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:41:33 -0600
> ajs wrote:
>
> > I followed the link from http://fedoraproject.org/get-prerelease to
> > the BFO images at http://boot.fedoraproject.org/download.
> >
> > These images do not point to F16 a
On 08/25/2011 04:36 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
Joachim Backes wrote:
my grub.cfg (using chainloader) entry for F15 (after installing grub2
in
F15 and installing then in F15 the grub2 bootloader to /dev/sda7):
menuentry 'Fedora 15' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu
--class os
Hi,
I installed all possible updates (selecting explicetely the packages
because of current yum problems). Then, after rebooting, if having
entered the password in the gdm screen, it takes at least 1 minute after
the gnome-shell desktop is complete.
Anybody sees this too?
Kind regards
Joac
Joachim Backes wrote:
> my grub.cfg (using chainloader) entry for F15 (after installing grub2
in
> F15 and installing then in F15 the grub2 bootloader to /dev/sda7):
>
> menuentry 'Fedora 15' --class fedora --class gnu-linux --class gnu
> --class os {
> set root=(hd0,7)
> chainloader +1
> }
>
Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 12:40 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>>
>> set root=(hd0,7)
>> linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64 root=/dev/sda7 ro quiet
etc
>> etc etc etc etc rd.=0 etc etc etc
>> initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64.img
> ^
>
On 08/25/2011 03:46 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
Hi,
since todays updates, Ctr+Alt+L no more locks the screen. Now I have to
activate the top right users menu and then press lock screen.
Anybody sees this too?
Known problem in F-15 too. B
On 08/25/2011 12:40 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
>
> set root=(hd0,7)
> linux /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64 root=/dev/sda7 ro quiet etc
> etc etc etc etc rd.=0 etc etc etc
> initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64.img
^
^
delete-| (both of them)
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:46:54 +0100, PR (Peter) wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > since todays updates, Ctr+Alt+L no more locks the screen. Now I have to
>> > activate the top right users
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:46:54 +0100, PR (Peter) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > since todays updates, Ctr+Alt+L no more locks the screen. Now I have to
> > activate the top right users menu and then press lock screen.
> >
> > Anybody sees this too?
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Joachim Backes
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since todays updates, Ctr+Alt+L no more locks the screen. Now I have to
> activate the top right users menu and then press lock screen.
>
> Anybody sees this too?
Known problem in F-15 too. Bug is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bu
Hi,
since todays updates, Ctr+Alt+L no more locks the screen. Now I have to
activate the top right users menu and then press lock screen.
Anybody sees this too?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
test m
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 08/24/2011 04:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> The fact that GRUB 2 by default won't install to a partition, and will
>> only do it if you use --force, is known. It's why anaconda can't install
>> the bootloader to a partition in Alph
On 08/24/2011 08:11 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 13:09 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 17:26:44 +0100
>> Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> I'm seriously wondering if multilib is worth all this hassle...
>>
>> Oh I've never wondered that: It has clearly never been a good
On 08/25/2011 08:25 AM, Thomas Mittelstaedt wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2011, 22:40 -0600 schrieb Petrus de Calguarium:
I have installed F16α and with it grub2 to the MBR of /dev/sda. I am
experimenting happily with F16, but I am unable to add F15 to the
grub2 boot menu.
I have edited /etc/gr
68 matches
Mail list logo
