On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 02:36 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 2
> (RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
> download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
> images arrive a few hours
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 23:59 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
> bootloader?
no. but you could do package customization, de-select grub2, and select
grub. (haven't tested this, but it sounds like it might work!)
--
Adam Williams
As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links and testing instructions. In general, official live
images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below
for updates. When
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bugzilla-4.0.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.8.4-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Can grub be passed to the installer to prevent grub2 being used as the
bootloader?
TIA
--
Regards,
OldFart
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#222: L10N Test Day
---+
Reporter: noriko| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day | Version:
Resolu
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bugzilla-4.0.2-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.8.4-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.11-79.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cl
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 18:08 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 17:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, folks. So, Athmane noticed that text mode firstboot doesn't really
> > happen in Fedora 16, as it's 'expected' to in the new base test case:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 17:18, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. So, Athmane noticed that text mode firstboot doesn't really
> happen in Fedora 16, as it's 'expected' to in the new base test case:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_firstboot
>
> we did a bit of investigation and
#230: QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_(encrypted)_install overlaps with
QA:Testcase_base_startup
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Miles
#79: Add firstboot release criteria
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki
Hey, folks. So, Athmane noticed that text mode firstboot doesn't really
happen in Fedora 16, as it's 'expected' to in the new base test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_firstboot
we did a bit of investigation and found that this is kinda normal.
firstboot is in the base-x pac
I last used sshfs successfully about 7-10 days ago. Since about 2-3
days, it no longer works.
In updates-testing, we have had a new kernel and a new selinux policy, I
believe.
I have tried booting both computers with an old kernel.
I have tried putting both computers into permissive mode
Nothi
On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 08:46 -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
>
> I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
> upstream choices as much as possible.
Either way, such
On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 16:54 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727381 stops me from doing a
> fresh F16 install, so I converted an F15 to F16. After finishing, I did some
> culling of packages I'll never use with yum. In the process, something
> eradicated Ne
Dear Adam:
>The following package versions "work for me":
>gdm-plugin-fingerprint-3.1.2-4.fc16.x86_64
>gdm-3.1.2-4.fc16.x86_64
>systemd-32-1.fc17.x86_64
>gnome-shell-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
>clutter-1.7.6-1.fc16.x86_64
>mutter-3.1.4-1.fc16.x86_64
Thank you for giving me the version numbers that work
The Fedora 15 EC2 test day took place on 2011-08-04. 5 testers posted
results to the test day page [1] providing 3 reproductions of a known
issue and one new bug filed.
New Bugs:
* 728465 [2] - Fedora EC2: httpd test failed with symbolic error
in /var/log/messages and systemd be
==
#fedora-meeting: Fedora QA meeting
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-08/fedora-qa.2011-08-08-15.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-08/fedora-qa
On 08/08/2011 08:15 AM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
>
> Wednesday, August 10, 2011 @22:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
My mistake - 21:00 UTC. 17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT still applies.
-Robyn
___
Compose started at Mon Aug 8 13:15:54 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting.
Wednesday, August 10, 2011 @22:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular
release. This meeting is calle
#229: asking to join the proven testers and requesting a mentor
--+-
Reporter: appelond | Owner: mcloaked
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think Fedora should be installing extensions by default.
I side with Rahul Sundaram. The default configuration should follow
upstream choices as much as possible.
If alternative choices are useful for a significant population of Fedora
users, these s
Compose started at Mon Aug 8 08:15:40 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-12
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> installed by default typically. From what I hear in the desktop
> summit, Owen Taylor seems to be interested in providing a power off
> option directly for the next version of GNOME and that should solve this
> particular concern
When you say "next version"
On 08/08/2011 03:24 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> What prompted me to suggest this was the comment
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643457#c74 referring to
> http://www.golem.de/1108/85539.html (German article). Google's German
> translation isn't very readable but AFAICT it seemed to con
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> As the maintainer and use of this extension, I don't think Fedora
> should be installing extensions by default. As a general principle, if
> some extension is so popular that it must be installed by default to
> provide a better experience for end user, this
On 08/08/2011 02:16 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
>
On 08/08/2011 08:46 AM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
>
On 08/08/2011 05:19 PM, Alexjan Carraturo wrote:
> 2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
>> I'm considering filing a bug for
>> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
>> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
>> including
>> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..
Additional info: it's not currently on the install DVDs, but after a default
install, installing it only drags in gnome-shell-extensions-common. Both
packages are of negligible size (6.5K and 19K).
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
2011/8/8 Andre Robatino :
> I'm considering filing a bug for
> gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
> to be included in a default installation, considering that most users,
> including
> myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use
> the
> Alt key), and
I'm considering filing a bug for gnome-shell-extensions-alternative-status-menu
to be included in a default installation, considering that most users, including
myself, seem to prefer having a "Power Off..." option (without having to use the
Alt key), and I haven't seen anyone other than the Gnome
34 matches
Mail list logo
