On 5.8.2011 00:12, Dennis Appelon Nielsen wrote:
> Hi All You Bug Zappers
> My name is Dennis Appelon Nielsen AKA: *AppelonD* . I'm happy to apply
> for membership of the BugZapper Fedora group.
Feel free to ping me on #fedora-bugzappers anytime (I am usually around
CET business hours and in the
The following Fedora 16 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cifs-utils-5.0-2.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.6-1.fc16
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openarena-0.8.5-4.fc16,quake3-1.36-11.svn2102.fc16
The following Fe
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.11-79.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.2-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ci
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/foomatic-4.0.7-3.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samba-3.5.11-71.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.4.4-5.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the develope
Hi All You Bug Zappers
My name is Dennis Appelon Nielsen AKA: AppelonD . I'm happy to apply for
membership of the BugZapper Fedora group.
I'm 30 years old and live in Denmark. In my day work I'm a Linux system
administrator for a company called Logica Danmark A/S
I'm a Red hat Certified Technician
>
>
> From: Adam Williamson
> To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases <
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:22:21 -0700
> Subject: Re: Post-TC1 strategizin'
> On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:08 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>
> > I suspect this is vacation time fo
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> > were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> > when they arrive is a function of the develope
Thanks a lot to all of you for this relevant info.
I have already subscribed to fedora-ppc mailing list.
I will start communicating there too.
yeah ! I will sure join #fedora-ppc on irc.
regards,
Manas
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Karsten Hopp wrote:
> Am 04.08.2011 17:22, schrieb Adam Willi
On 08/04/2011 08:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Don't quite see what you mean. We're behind because the TC1 images
> were delayed by a week, that's pretty much it. The shape they're in
> when they arrive is a function of the developers, we don't have much
> control over it =)
That is a bit of a
Am 04.08.2011 17:22, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 13:22 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> > Manash Kumar Nayak píše v Čt 04. 08. 2011 v 16:28 +0530:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Frank Murphy
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar
> > So, we have the choice of waiting for all blockers to be resolved before
> > we do the next compose, which might take a while, or doing a TC2 with
> > the most critical fixes in. What approach do people think we should
> > take? Would a TC2 have any value or should we just clean up all the
> >
On 08/03/2011 07:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> So, we have the choice of waiting for all blockers to be resolved before
> we do the next compose, which might take a while, or doing a TC2 with
> the most critical fixes in. What approach do people think we should
> take? Would a TC2 have any value
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 13:22 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> Manash Kumar Nayak píše v Čt 04. 08. 2011 v 16:28 +0530:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Frank Murphy
> > wrote:
> >
> > On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar Nayak wrote:
> > > I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha T
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 14:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> > for post-Alpha TC1.
> >
> > We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> > have a lot of
Compose started at Thu Aug 4 13:16:21 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #4
# Date: 2011-08-05
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Mark your calendars ... the fourth Alpha blocker review meeting starts
at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers this Friday. We'll review p
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 11:23 +0530, Srinivasa Narayanappa wrote:
> Hello All,
Hi Srinivasa,
Thanks for participating in testing TC1!
> I have tried to install the FC16 Alpha TC1 on VMWare virtual machine,
> after selecting the hard disk for the portioning getting the error
> message as "no usable
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 21:21 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> Honestly I rather having the extra TC build to weed out any potential
> blocker that could arise during fixing and spinning of the known blockers.
> I've seen that happen in the past and an extra spin can help make sure RC is
> better at the s
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Why did this happen? What went wrong? The strategy should be based on
> that.
James and Adam have already begun to outline some of the reasons on
the F16 QA Retrospective page on the wiki. Everyone is welcome to add
their input to that pa
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 14:11:43 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
>> for post-Alpha TC1.
>>
>> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
>> have a lot of block
> > Honestly, I don't know. On the one hand, I have some scripts that
> > are good for fedora
> > QE in general. For example, the shell error test...why would anyone
> > purposely write
> > shell script that does not work? This can always be fixed before a
> > release. Some tests
> > are still unde
Manash Kumar Nayak píše v Čt 04. 08. 2011 v 16:28 +0530:
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Frank Murphy
> wrote:
>
> On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar Nayak wrote:
> > I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha TC1 image, but unfortunately
> could not
> > find the
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar Nayak wrote:
> > I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha TC1 image, but unfortunately could not
> > find the same.
> > I think it is not yet available to test.
> > Any idea when F16 PPC image would be available for test
On 04/08/11 10:24, Manash Kumar Nayak wrote:
> I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha TC1 image, but unfortunately could not
> find the same.
> I think it is not yet available to test.
> Any idea when F16 PPC image would be available for testing ?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Manas
>
>
ppc hasn't been support
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 18:04:17 +0800, HR (He) wrote:
> > After choosing "Create custom layout", Anaconda re-examined the devices
> > once more, then crashed:
> >
> > LUKSError: luks device not configured
>
> Please file it.
Did that yesterday: #727814
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproj
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 12:01 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Downloaded Fedora 16 Alpha TC1 netinstall iso x86_64 for a first brief
> look. Booted the included isolinux kernel+initrd. Cancelled the first
> LUKS passphrase prompt, but entered the passphrase for an experimental
> /home LV, which is s
I was looking for F16 PPC Alpha TC1 image, but unfortunately could not find
the same.
I think it is not yet available to test.
Any idea when F16 PPC image would be available for testing ?
Thanks & Regards,
Manas
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedo
On 08/04/2011 06:11 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> for post-Alpha TC1.
>
> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
Why did this hap
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 17:41:09 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> I thought it'd be a good idea to take a step back and plan a strategy
> for post-Alpha TC1.
>
> We're in trouble for Alpha; we're a long way behind schedule, and we
> have a lot of blocker bugs remaining. TC1 is in pretty bad shape.
>
> By p
30 matches
Mail list logo
