#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
After discussing with smooge and nirik on #fedora-admin, decided to change the
16 Alpha TC1 test matrix pages to use dl.fp.o instead of serverbeach1.fp.o and
alt.fp.o for download links. If no problems are seen, the template pages can be
changed to make it permanent. This would eliminate up to an h
#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 16:20 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> > 3. If 'no' to question 2, do people think we need to do some sort of
> > review and notification outside of the blocker meetings and updating
> > the bugs themselves? If so, what?
>
> I think that there could be some value in going over the
#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
#227: Document SOP for acceptance test event
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: wutao85
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Version:
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:52:12 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> "Daily Review & Notification of Open Alpha|Beta|Final Blocker Bugs"
> is a trickier customer. As scheduled, it seems to suggest that for
> Alpha, Beta and Final, we should be 'reviewing and notifying' open
> blockers for an arbitrary-s
I'm currently surveying the QA release calendar:
http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html
to check we have SOPs for all tasks on it. As part of that, a couple of
tasks have emerged that we don't really _do_.
"NVR Update Check testing" was requested a long time ago
#228: SOPs for Everything
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Wiki | Version:
#228: SOPs for Everything
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Wiki | Version:
#228: SOPs for Everything
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17
Component: Wiki | Version:
Key
Rob Healey (robheal...@gmail.com) said:
> Is this really two days in a row of no Rawhide Report?
Well, when there's two days of no rawhide trees...
Fixing.
Bill
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Greetings:
Is this really two days in a row of no Rawhide Report?
--
Sincerely yours,
Rob G. Healey
"Always surround yourself with people that inspire you to
greatness!"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#227: Document SOP for acceptance test event
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: wutao85
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Version:
#227: Document SOP for acceptance test event
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: wutao85
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Version:
17 matches
Mail list logo
