On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > We also need a test case for this, of course.
>
> Good point. Unless anyone else wants a shot at it, I'll draft something
> up shortly and send to the list for review.
Oh, do note that we test shut down / restart from login manager and
d
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 08:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > > > Comment:
> > > >
> > > > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test
Just a heads-up to let everyone know that Fedora 16 is now branched from
Rawhide. This means that we're now into the phase where pre-Beta
requirements for updates apply (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy): updates-testing is in
effect for F16, so if you're running F16, remember to s
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 14:35 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > The asymmetry there was intentional and I sort of like it; I think it's
> > a bigger problem if we install to your type of storage then shut it down
> > uncleanly than if we just don't install to it. But on the other hand,
> > you could arg
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 10:24 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > s,systems',system's,g
> >
> > Doh, thanks :)
> >
> > > I think we don't really need reboot to work; shut down and then turn
> > > back on is a fine workaround at Alpha phase.
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 07:56 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > s,systems',system's,g
>
> Doh, thanks :)
>
> > I think we don't really need reboot to work; shut down and then turn
> > back on is a fine workaround at Alpha phase. If there was a bug in
> > rebooting, but shutting down worked, I'd probab
#227: Document SOP for acceptance test event
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: twu
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Version:
Subject: Re: Proposed Alpha criteria adjustments
From: jla...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:56:38 -0400
>On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wr
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 16:17 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> Perhaps the same text could be copied into all test cases in Kickstart
> Delivery - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Kickstart_Delivery
I've made the proposed change to all kickstart tests linked in the above
category.
Thanks
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 3:06 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > > > Comment:
> > > >
> > > > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 18:45 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > > Comment:
> > >
> > > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like：
> > > >
> > > > *
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Q
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 19:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I made a small change to the blocker meeting SOP -
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting#Review_Proposed_Blocker_Bugs
> - just to make it explicit that it's okay to delay the decision on a bug if
> needed informatio
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 21:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:08 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > The installer must be able to complete an installation using the
> > entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions
> > methods, with or w
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the rawhide acceptance
test run of Fedora 16. Thanks for your attention.
I have test the Fedora-16-test-20110721-3-i386.iso, found that bug
#723144(anaconda 16.12 crashed after the partition process) and #723831
(Got stuck due to
On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 11:30 +0300, Frederick William New wrote:
> > Comment:
> >
> > Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like：
> > >
> > > *
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Http_Server_Ks_Cfg
> >
> > The added expect
On 07/26/2011 05:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:20 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
>
>> I want to make sure that we (QA) can't include a SPIN (or Cloud image)
>> validation matrix to SOP until it's integrated to fedora release
>> engineering (Koji, etc ...).
>
> It's an int
> Comment:
>
> Replying to [comment:1 rhe]:
> > Agree. add a expected result in each kickstart test like：
> >
> > *
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_Http_Server_Ks_Cfg
>
> The added expected result is: [[BR]]
> # Anaconda should not prompt for user interaction if ks.cf
#227: Document SOP for acceptance test event
---+
Reporter: rhe| Owner: twu
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Version:
#226: Create F16 install test plan and test result template
---+
Reporter: rhe| Owner: rhe
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Wiki | Ve
#209: Add tests to cover partitioning using root on btrfs, xfs or other non-ext
fstype's
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: ma
20 matches
Mail list logo
