On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 19:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 07:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Your ideas are consistent with how we've handled this before, I don't
> > think I could have articulated nearly as well though:) My
> > understanding is that FESCO is the right place
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 17:04 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:20 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
>
> > I am being curious and nosy all in one on this topic! I can see that
> > in koji perl-5.14.1-179;tf16 has been compiled successfully, but I do
> > not see it available in rawhide...
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:20 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> I am being curious and nosy all in one on this topic! I can see that
> in koji perl-5.14.1-179;tf16 has been compiled successfully, but I do
> not see it available in rawhide...
% koji buildinfo perl-5.14.1-179.fc16 | grep ^Finished
Finished
On 07/13/2011 08:11 PM, James Laska wrote:
Quite a bit smaller than the 100+ bugs on the list. Was that decision
from a recent FESCO meeting?
It's the one held on 15 June.
See this thread on -devel [1] also note that FESCO accepted the feature
[2] on the bases that native systemd unit files
Greetings:
I am being curious and nosy all in one on this topic! I can see that in
koji perl-5.14.1-179;tf16 has been compiled successfully, but I do not see
it available in rawhide...
I truly do not understand anything in being a project manager or a package
mainter, but will it be released for
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 19:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/13/2011 07:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Your ideas are consistent with how we've handled this before, I don't
> > think I could have articulated nearly as well though:) My
> > understanding is that FESCO is the right place
On 07/13/2011 07:17 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Your ideas are consistent with how we've handled this before, I don't
> think I could have articulated nearly as well though:) My
> understanding is that FESCO is the right place to discuss whether a
> feature should block a release or not.
They alrea
On 07/13/2011 06:22 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 14:28:33 -0400,
>James Laska wrote:
>> == Suggested Meeting Preparation ==
> Is there a plan to steamline dealing with all of the systemd create a native
> service bugs?
We need to be monitoring this page [1] Core + Base
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:52 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 14:28:33 -0400,
> > James Laska wrote:
> > > == Suggested Meeting Preparation ==
> >
> > Is there a plan to steamline dealing with all of the systemd
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 14:28:33 -0400,
> James Laska wrote:
> > == Suggested Meeting Preparation ==
>
> Is there a plan to steamline dealing with all of the systemd create a native
> service bugs?
Here's a plan: we reject them all.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 14:28:33 -0400,
James Laska wrote:
> == Suggested Meeting Preparation ==
Is there a plan to steamline dealing with all of the systemd create a native
service bugs?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman
# F16 Alpha Blocker Review meeting #1
# Date: 2011-07-15
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Hard to believe, but the "vacation" is over. Fedora 16 Alpha test
compose is a few weeks away (Jul 26) and the Alpha is about a month
On 07/13/2011 06:46 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Hi Joey!
>
> Thanks for reaching out to Fedora QA.
>
>
> This is a somewhat new process that we haven't fully ironed out yet, so
> bare with me as we discuss how best to accommodate your request.
>
> As the spin creator, my thought is that you are in th
Hi Joey!
Thanks for reaching out to Fedora QA.
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 13:19 -0400, Joey Boggs wrote:
> It seems there are some issues with the current Spins approval process,
> but to workaround I've been asked to contact each of your lists to get
> acks for approval to keep the ball rolling.
>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:19:52 -0400,
Joey Boggs wrote:
> It seems there are some issues with the current Spins approval
> process, but to workaround I've been asked to contact each of your
> lists to get acks for approval to keep the ball rolling.
>
> The spins feature page in question is lo
#212: Review Fedora on Amazon EC2 Test Day wiki page:
---+
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day
#212: Review Fedora on Amazon EC2 Test Day wiki page:
---+
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day
#212: Review Fedora on Amazon EC2 Test Day wiki page:
---+
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day
#221: Reduce Blocker Bug Review Meeting Length
--+-
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Trac
#215: Request for mentor to become the Proven Tester
--+-
Reporter: seenafcqa| Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major
#211: Request to Join the Proven testers club
--+-
Reporter: seena321 | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major|
21 matches
Mail list logo
