On 07/08/2011 03:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
>>> If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
>>> multiple release cycles
>> How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
>> etc... ? We have that n
On 07/08/2011 05:40 AM, drago01 wrote:
> Well the proper fix is to disable auto push if there is any negative vote.
> The maintainer should then have to push it by hand (or if necessary
> provide an updated package instead of letting it get pushed).
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618
--
te
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.4.3.1-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drupal7-7.4-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-3.1.4-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 12:49 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > > >
> > > > arch for each mi
On Friday, July 08, 2011 10:10:33 AM James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > >
> > > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> > > of du
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 13:07 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > I've now expanded the proposal into a full template:
> >
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_base_validation_matrix
> >
> > further comments welcome! There will probably be a few more tests once
> > we're done checking B
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 10:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > > Any ideas
> > > > for naming, etc? Any comments on the test cases written so far? Thanks!
> > >
> > > One thought, the 'base' matrix page looks a bit sparse.
> >
> >
#212: Review Fedora on Amazon EC2 Test Day wiki page:
---+
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Day
#212: Review Fedora on Amazon EC2 Test Day wiki page:
---+
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Test Day
#219: Create virtualization installation validation test cases
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Co
#218: Extend rescue mode installation validation test case to fully validate
relevant criterion
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 08:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
> > > multiple release cycles
> >
> > How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
> >
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:15 +, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> > arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> > of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only
> > highlight th
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 11:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > If doable we should try to come up with a solution aimed at/fits
> > multiple release cycles
>
> How do you mean ... something that works for Fedora 13, 14, 15, 16
> etc... ? We have that now, I just didn't include any details about how
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 17:11 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 16:24 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > 4. Inline exceptions - No new pages created, simply modify the
> > existing criteria pages to indicate which arches criteria apply
> > for (example at [4])
>
On Thu, 2011-07-07 at 21:08 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/07/2011 08:24 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings folks,
> >
> > I'm interested in developing a solution to allow Fedora secondary
> > architectures [1] (specifically ppc64 and s390x for now) to leverage our
> > existing rel
> 2. Highlight differences - Draft individual wiki pages for each
> arch for each milestone (Alpha, Beta, Final). However, instead
> of duplicating all applicable primary arch content, only
> highlight the differences between the primary and secondary
> arch.
Compose started at Fri Jul 8 08:15:10 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
>
>> > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters",
>> >
>> > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
>> > flaw in the test update, please
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:00:42 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > To all testers, in particular the so-called "proventesters",
> >
> > if in a bodhi ticket two testers have voted -1 and pointed out a major
> > flaw in the test update, please don't vote +1. If you don't take the
> > time to verify the -1,
20 matches
Mail list logo
