#207: Review Security Lab spin validation matrix
--+-
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test
#207: Reveiw Security Lab spin validation matrix
-+--
Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16
Component: Test Rev
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:23:34 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > but lots of testers
> > > don't seem to have such a problem.
> >
> > From what I read in the comments, they were not using gnome-shell but
> > either gnome fallback or another DE.
>
> I'm running gnome-shell.
On 6/24/11 5:49 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
> I just installed f15 via BFO, onto a system with S3 PCI video.
> By default, the Xorg X11 S3 video driver is not installed. Was this
> intentional or should I file a bug? The S3 card is old, but I want my
> server to use less power.
If you do mean s3 (and not
Hey, folks. So, right now, as most of you know, we have two release
validation 'matrices' - sets of tests we run and document on each
candidate build of Fedora to check compliance with the release criteria.
A few of us have been working in ticket #151 -
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/15
Adam Williamson wrote:
> Can you file a bug with all the logs you can gather from the crash?
> Thanks. Does abrt not catch it?
I was planning on it, but it will be a few hours before I can spend the
time to do so.
abrt does not catch it.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsu
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 14:00 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > but lots of testers
> > don't seem to have such a problem.
>
> From what I read in the comments, they were not using gnome-shell but
> either gnome fallback or another DE.
I'm running gnome-shell. I've si
Michael Cronenworth ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on
24/06/2011 21:04:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Not sure it is related but
>>
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2011-June/400607.html
>
> I don't believe it is related. The system I tested with is fully up to
> date w
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Not sure it is related but
>> >
>> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2011-June/400607.html
> I don't believe it is related. The system I tested with is fully up to
> date with the "updates" repo. "updates-testing" is not enabl
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> You should file a RFE against bodhi
Done.
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/618
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
#205: Create test case for system logging
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: athmane,adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Not sure it is related but
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2011-June/400607.html
I don't believe it is related. The system I tested with is fully up to
date with the "updates" repo. "updates-testing" is not enabled.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedor
On 06/25/2011 12:32 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> BTW, the auto-push happened*before* the two comments about Shell
>> breakage. The only negative comment prior to that related to the strange
>> character in the window title.
> Yet, it was still negative karma. What's t
Adam Williamson wrote:
> BTW, the auto-push happened*before* the two comments about Shell
> breakage. The only negative comment prior to that related to the strange
> character in the window title.
Yet, it was still negative karma. What's the harm of turning off
auto-push when an authenticated n
On 06/25/2011 12:16 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:06 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
>>> bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
>>> This update has been pushed to stable
>> ... and now al
Adam Williamson wrote:
> but lots of testers
> don't seem to have such a problem.
From what I read in the comments, they were not using gnome-shell but
either gnome fallback or another DE.
> More details would probably help.
I'm the user "mooninite".
I either see a message in .xsession-errors
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:06 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
> > bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
> > This update has been pushed to stable
>
> ... and now all users of gnome-shell have a broken system.
>
On 06/24/2011 07:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:06 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
>>>bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
>>>This update has been pushed to stable
>>
>> ... and n
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 13:06 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
> > bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
> > This update has been pushed to stable
>
> ... and now all users of gnome-shell have a broken system.
>
#205: Create test case for system logging
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: athmane,adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 16:17 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> In addition, there's no criteria referring to 'preupgrade from order
> release test'[3] yet, should it be put into beta 11.[4] or the final
> criteria?
I don't think so; so far we've considered this intentional, the test is
purely informational:
upda...@fedoraproject.org on 06/24/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
> bodhi - 2011-06-24 17:57:38 (karma 0)
> This update has been pushed to stable
... and now all users of gnome-shell have a broken system.
Bodhi should not auto-push updates that have any negative karma.
--
test
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvoikko-3.0-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.17-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-21.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ejabberd-2.1.8-2.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.8.4.2-1.fc15.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torque-3.0.1-3.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 05:49 -0400, Rick Leir wrote:
> I just installed f15 via BFO, onto a system with S3 PCI video.
> By default, the Xorg X11 S3 video driver is not installed. Was this
> intentional or should I file a bug? The S3 card is old, but I want my
> server to use less power.
>
> It is
I just installed f15 via BFO, onto a system with S3 PCI video.
By default, the Xorg X11 S3 video driver is not installed. Was this
intentional or should I file a bug? The S3 card is old, but I want my
server to use less power.
It is possible though difficult to use Add/Remove software to add the
#205: Create test case for system logging
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: athmane,adamwill
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16
Component:
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 15:39 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback! Some follow-up below...
>
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 10:46 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings testers,
> > >
> > > I've been playing with some ideas
28 matches
Mail list logo
