Fedora 14 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-ftpd-1.0.32-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fetchmail-6.3.20-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_ssh-1.97-7.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates

Fedora 15 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.8.4.2-1.fc15.1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torque-3.0.1-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvoikko-3.2.1-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update

Re: my excitement is unreachable...

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:30:30PM -0700, Rob Healey wrote: > Non-standard uts for running kernel: > release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608 > > Could anyone explain this, and if it is important to worry about? > procps has a buggy check, I'll send a patch upstream.

Re: my excitement is unreachable...

On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 5:30:30 PM, Rob Healy wrote: >As much as I am anxious to play around with it, I received this >on my terminal window when I first opened it >Non-standard uts for running kernel: >release 3.0-0.rc3.git0.3.fc16.x86_64=3.0.0 gives version code 196608 >Could anyone ex

my excitement is unreachable...

Great Afternoon to All of You: Today, I upgraded my system to the current fc16/ rawhide packages! I was anxiously skeptical to try the new kernel-3.0-0.rc3.git0-3.fc16.x86_64 kernel because I had no love from the 2.6.39 and kernel-3.0-0 series so far up to today! I upgraded to this new kernel, a

Yum memory improvements

I am not certain if this list is now exclusively for F16. If it is, then here is my request to F16 guys to see if yum can be backported to F15. -- Regards  Leslie Mr. Leslie Satenstein 40 years in IT and going strong. Yesterday was a good day, today is a better day, and tomo

Re: [Fedora QA] #183: Request to join the ProvenTesters Group

#183: Request to join the ProvenTesters Group --+- Reporter: wonderer | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major

Re: [Fedora QA] #189: I would like to join the proven testers and would like to have a mentor

#189: I would like to join the proven testers and would like to have a mentor --+- Reporter: ikatalinikov | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority

Re: [Fedora QA] #196: proventester request

#196: proventester request --+- Reporter: azur3l1ght | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone:

Re: [Fedora QA] #194: proven tester request

#194: proven tester request --+- Reporter: sanchez | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone:

Re: info new testers

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:53 PM, lobo wrote: > Hi All, > > I was wondering what is the best way to get in to testing Fedora as a > proven tester, I did raise I ticket on trac  (#194) a few weeks back but > got no reply yet. Is this an open group or you need referrals or similar > things? I realise

Re: [Fedora QA] #194: proven tester request

#194: proven tester request --+- Reporter: sanchez | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone:

info new testers

Hi All, I was wondering what is the best way to get in to testing Fedora as a proven tester, I did raise I ticket on trac (#194) a few weeks back but got no reply yet. Is this an open group or you need referrals or similar things? I realise am not able to attend to the IRC meetings as is during m

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-ftpd-1.0.32-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fetchmail-6.3.20-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_ssh-1.97-7.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates

Fedora 15 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/asterisk-1.8.4.2-1.fc15.1 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/torque-3.0.1-2.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvoikko-3.2.1-1.fc15 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update

Re: [Fedora QA] #198: Clarifying ways to verify updated and skipped bootloader

#198: Clarifying ways to verify updated and skipped bootloader --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16 Co

Re: 50 second fedora-storage-init.service in rawhide: reasonable?

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jurgen Kramer wrote: > On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > > $ systemd-analyze blame > > 50820ms fedora-storage-init.service > >6941ms udev-settle.service > >4020ms cups.service > >1954ms fedora-storage-init-late.service > >

Re: 50 second fedora-storage-init.service in rawhide: reasonable?

On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:39 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > $ systemd-analyze blame > 50820ms fedora-storage-init.service >6941ms udev-settle.service >4020ms cups.service >1954ms fedora-storage-init-late.service >1567ms fedora-loadmodules.service > .. > > Is 50 secs reasonabl

50 second fedora-storage-init.service in rawhide: reasonable?

$ systemd-analyze blame 50820ms fedora-storage-init.service 6941ms udev-settle.service 4020ms cups.service 1954ms fedora-storage-init-late.service 1567ms fedora-loadmodules.service .. Is 50 secs reasonable given the following fstab (apologies for the line wraps)? /dev/mapper/Vol

Re: [Fedora QA] #86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade

#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15 Componen

[Fedora QA] #198: Clarifying ways to verify updated and skipped bootloader

#198: Clarifying ways to verify updated and skipped bootloader -+-- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 16 Compon