Re: Draft btrfs testcase

2011-06-06 Thread JB
John Dulaney live.com> writes: > ... > I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumptionthat it will be default for F16. > ... If you are into it, spend some time reading this thread (you will also find idea(s) for testing): Btrfs: broken file system design (was Unbound(?) intern

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-06-06 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gimp-2.6.11-14.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-06-06 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bind-9.7.4-0.2.b1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pure-ftpd-1.0.32-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomboy-1.6.0-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Re: Draft btrfs testcase

2011-06-06 Thread He Rui
On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 18:26 -0400, John Dulaney wrote: > I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption > that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or > suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just > done for the day. > > John. > > >

Draft btrfs testcase

2011-06-06 Thread John Dulaney
I am working on a draft btrfs test case (1) under the assumption that it will be default for F16. I'd appreciate any additions or suggestions for addition. Note that it isn't finished yet, I'm just done for the day. John. (1) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_btrfs

Re: [Fedora QA] #192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday)

2011-06-06 Thread Fedora QA
#192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday) ---+ Reporter: lwang | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test

Re: [Fedora QA] #192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday)

2011-06-06 Thread Fedora QA
#192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday) ---+ Reporter: lwang | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test

Re: [Fedora QA] #192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday)

2011-06-06 Thread Fedora QA
#192: Proposed Test Day - IPv6 - June 8, 2011 (Wednesday) ---+ Reporter: lwang | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test

2011-06-06 - Fedora QA Meeting - recap

2011-06-06 Thread James Laska
Minutes and IRC log can be found on that wiki at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110606 TOPIC: Release criteria updates == * vhumpa started a discussion on test + desktop lists last week - http

rawhide report: 20110606 changes

2011-06-06 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Jun 6 08:15:42 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadmsslutil.so.1 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.i686 requires libadminutil.so.1 389-admin-1.1.16-1.fc16.x86_64

2011-06-06 @ **15:00 UTC** - Fedora QA Meeting - proposed agenda

2011-06-06 Thread James Laska
mail with additional topics/suggestions. == Proposed Agenda Topics == https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110606 1. Release criteria updates 2. AutoQA updates? 3. World IPv6 Test Day - Wednesday, June 8th 4. Open Discussion - Thanks, James [1] https://fedoraprojec

Re: Proposal: Too similar application names

2011-06-06 Thread Vitezslav Humpa
> I agree, this is a good starting point. I don't really see the point > of the popups, > but if other folks think they're necessary, I won't argue. Wouldn't have to be popups. Actually they are used now to provide a textual description of what the application does, e.g. for "Brasero Disk Burner"