Rob Healey gmail.com> writes:
> ...
Do you have this package installed ?
yum-presto
JB
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Greetings:
I am also not sure if some of these ideas are because of BtrFs or not?
I would like to take a few minutes to discuss what my first impressions are
with BtrFs... From information that Josef gave me this afternoon, I
downloaded the F15-RC3-x86_64-DVD today, and installed 1888 packages..
Rob Healey gmail.com> writes:
> ...
# yum remove "kernel*2.6.39-0.fc16"
Now try this with max of verbosity, debugging and errors:
$ man yum
...
-v, --verbose
Run with a lot of debugging output.
-d, --debuglevel=[number]
Sets the debugging level t
Greetings:
Just to give some history and explanation...
* Today, I installed fc15-rc3-x86_64-DVD...
* I updated this installation with fedora, updates, and updates-testing...
* disabled those repos and enabled rawhide
* updated to rawhide current, with the kernel of kernel-2.6.39-0.fc16
Here is
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 14:59 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:52:35 -0500
> Ian Pilcher wrote:
>
> > On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > fedpkg co somepackage
> >
> > [pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
> > Cloning into btrfs-progs...
> > The authenticity
On Fri, 20 May 2011 15:52:35 -0500
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > fedpkg co somepackage
>
> [pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
> Cloning into btrfs-progs...
> The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)'
> can't be established.
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm all for making maintainers lives easier, but ...
If you are not a packager you can just do:
git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/btrfs-progs.git
fedpkg is for Fedora Packagers. :)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedorapr
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh-2.3.3-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viewvc-1.1.11-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmo
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-4.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rssh-2.3.3-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/avahi-0.6.27-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dovecot-
The following Fedora 15 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-4.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/viewvc-1.1.11-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dovecot-2.0.13-1.fc15
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rss
On 05/20/2011 02:52 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> fedpkg co somepackage
> [pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
> Cloning into btrfs-progs...
> The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't
> be established.
> RSA key finger
Ian Pilcher wrote:
> Permission denied (publickey).
> fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Do you have a fedora cert in ~/.fedora?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Adam Williamson wrote:
> git log (note the ID of the commit*immediately prior* to yours)
> git format-patch (commit ID you identified in the last step)
Simpler step:
git format-patch -1
The "-1" formats the last commit into a patch. -2 does the previous two,
etc.
--
test mailing list
test@lis
On 05/20/2011 03:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> fedpkg co somepackage
[pilcher@ian temp]$ fedpkg co btrfs-progs
Cloning into btrfs-progs...
The authenticity of host 'pkgs.fedoraproject.org (209.132.181.4)' can't
be established.
RSA key fingerprint is fe:2e:6a:86:f3:41:e7:03:95:ea:9c:7f:75:9c:ce:9
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 13:31 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > With the awesomeness of git-format-patch, probably not =) It's good to
> > get into the habit of providing spec fixes as git-formatted patches
> > these days, it makes it very easy on the main
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 16:17 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
> It has been my understanding that anyone from QA that's present (it
> happened
> I was the only one present for F14 final) can cast the vote (which I
> did, +1).
> If I was wrong in this, then maybe F14 shouldn't have shipped?
No, that was f
It has been my understanding that anyone from QA that's present (it happened
I was the only one present for F14 final) can cast the vote (which I did, +1).
If I was wrong in this, then maybe F14 shouldn't have shipped?
I do think that having the meeting as a failsafe is a good idea.
> Hey, all.
> spin-kickstarts-0.15.6-1.fc15 has been built with the state used for RC3.
> It does not include the LXDE commit from after RC3. If a new LXDE is
> built before release then we should probably do another build before
> release. Same if SOAS has and ks changes before it is built. Otherwise
> I'll
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth
> Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> > ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
> > it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
>
> As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
>
> And did not affect Disabled.
> --
>
> ok, f1
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> ping -R seems to work here as long as the hosts you are pinging allow
> it. I have found some up stream of me that do not.
As the bug report states, the issue has long since been fixed.
And did not affect Disabled.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
Dear fellow testers,
I have a 64 bit install of Fedora and firefox is not saving settings,
bookmarks, etc. I had set them, turned machine off and back on and the
settings are the same as it came before. Has anyone encountered this or is it
just me?
[root@GHSE213-033561 ~]# rpm -qa firefox
f
2011/5/20 cornel panceac
>
>
> 2011/5/20 JB
>
>> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >
>> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
>> time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>> >
>>
>> Well, I just looked out the window ...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:47 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Kevin DeKorte wrote:
>> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
>
> I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
> prohibiting ping -R e
2011/5/20 JB
> cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last
> time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >
>
> Well, I just looked out the window ...
>
> There are a couple of guys out there, w
cornel panceac gmail.com> writes:
>
> hello,can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>
Well, I just looked out the window ...
There are a couple of guys out there, with some funny head covers, smil
2011/5/20 Tom Horsley
> On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
> > > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
> >
> > why not?
>
> Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
> app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
> prob
On Fri, 20 May 2011 21:43:47 +0300
cornel panceac wrote:
> > You cannot remove SELinux completely from Fedora through yum.
>
> why not?
Because selinux libraries are linked with virtually every
app. In fact the only way to completely eradicate it is
probably switch to the gentoo distro and se
Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> I have selinux disabled, and have for years and I don't have any issues.
I may have remembered incorrectly. I found the bug[1] and it was SELinux
prohibiting ping -R even when set to Permissive (not Disabled).
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486225
--
test
cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth mailto:m...@cchtml.com>>
>
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the
>
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
>> selinux\* policy\*.
>> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
>> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need
2011/5/20 Michael Cronenworth
> cornel panceac wrote:
> > ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> > selinux\* policy\*.
> > one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> > and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't
cornel panceac wrote:
> ok, to put it simply i don't need it. and remove like in yum remove
> selinux\* policy\*.
> one other reason is that the computer is not the fastest in the world
> and i don't want to waste time with yum upgrading things i don't need.
Side note: This thread is a great c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 12:36 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
>> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
>> user with too many privs once wh
2011/5/20 Jon Ciesla
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > cornel panceac wrote:
> >
> >> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> >> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
> >>
> >
> > Define "remove".
> >
> > If you mean disable then Fedora
Jon Ciesla wrote:
> I'm actually trying to envision a situation in which it wouldn't run
> with SELinux Disabled. I can't. But, yeah, removed. . .well, I had a
> user with too many privs once who removed python.
I cannot remember the exact case, but there was something with
networking (maybe pi
I got a bunch of these - this kernel is the F15 2.6.38.6-27 kernel
compiled from src rpm on F14
(sorry for wrap).
Anywone else seeing any issues with iwlagn ? I thought a bunch of fixes
for iwlagn went into 2.6.38.6 ?
g/
- /var/log/messages snippet ---
May 20 14:10:14 lap1 ke
On 05/20/2011 12:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> With the awesomeness of git-format-patch, probably not =) It's good to
> get into the habit of providing spec fixes as git-formatted patches
> these days, it makes it very easy on the maintainer - they can apply it
> with a one-liner.
Is there any d
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> cornel panceac wrote:
>
>> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
>> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
>>
>
> Define "remove".
>
> If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
>
cornel panceac wrote:
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Define "remove".
If you mean disable then Fedora will run with SELinux set[1] to
Disabled. If it doesn't then you should file a bug.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 09:14:13PM +0300, cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i tried,
> (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
Just to ask the stupid question, are you aware that it can be turned off
at insta
cornel panceac wrote:
> hello,
>
> can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
> tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
I don't know. I'm not sure why you'd want to, what do you have in
mind? Why Disabled or Permissive insufficient?
-J
--
hello,
can fedora work without selinux? i'd like to remove it but last time i
tried, (f10, maybe) the system no longer booted, without selinux.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 05/20/2011 07:36 PM, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
> thanks, maybe another Power Management feature worth to note:
> We have recently added support for Asus SHE (Super Hybrid Engine)
> into tuned.
Do edit the wiki and add the info directly.
Rahul
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 11:08 -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 10:57 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> > Also, given the triviality that you point out a patch in the bug wouldn't go
> > amiss I'm sure (fwiw e2fsprogs uses hardlinks for these files and dosfstools
> > uses symlinks).
>
> Yeah, but
On 05/20/2011 10:57 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> Also, given the triviality that you point out a patch in the bug wouldn't go
> amiss I'm sure (fwiw e2fsprogs uses hardlinks for these files and dosfstools
> uses symlinks).
Yeah, but it would be a one-line patch to the SPEC file. It seems like
it w
On 05/20/2011 04:48 PM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri May 20 10:28:21 UTC 2011 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> It was probably running under different user then who is running the
>> abrt-gui so gui can't access it and doesn't show it. You can try to run
>> the gui as root to see all the crashes.
>
> I
On 05/20/2011 03:31 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> On 05/20/2011 01:08 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>
>> No idea. Try filing a RFE against that package
>>
>
> Doesn't appear to have done any good in the past.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625967
>
I find I get better responses in b
On Fri May 20 10:28:21 UTC 2011 Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> It was probably running under different user then who is running the
> abrt-gui so gui can't access it and doesn't show it. You can try to run
> the gui as root to see all the crashes.
I had this problem too and indeed running the gui from ro
On 05/20/2011 01:08 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
> No idea. Try filing a RFE against that package
>
Doesn't appear to have done any good in the past.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625967
--
Ian Pilcher
Hi,
Does anyone have any pointers for getting F15 beta to run as a Hyper-V virtual
guest? I was unable to get the Legacy Network Adapter to work, so I thought I
would ask before I attempt to set up an environment where I can recompile the
kernel to create the drivers/staging/hv modules.
Fred
sudo service sendmail status
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to connect to socket
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/private: Connection refused
Failed to get D-Bus connection: Failed to connect to socket
/org/freedesktop/systemd1/private: Connection refused
sendmailFailed to get D-Bus connection:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'll look at creating the page when I'm home from work. I'm not on IRC
> much but I may start a thread on the -devel list to generate some
> discussion and content ideas.
A basic draft is now up at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Btrfs
I st
On 05/14/2011 05:28 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> May 14 11:23:24 nbecker1 abrt[17229]: saved core dump of pid 17226
> (/usr/libexec/colord) to
> /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2011-05-14-11:23:24-17226.new/coredump (18477056 bytes)
>
> But run abrt-gui doesn't show anything.
>
> So 2 problems, colord dumping and
Compose started at Fri May 20 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit)
beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_
54 matches
Mail list logo
