F15 TC1 dvd (from usb) installer failing : no network available

2011-05-07 Thread Pratyush Sahay
Hello, Tried installing F15 TC1 from a USB DVD media, created using UNetBootin from F15-i386-dvd.iso image. The installer exits after the "Boot Loader OS list" step, the error being shown : No Network Available.. some of the software repos require networking, but there was an error enabling the n

Re: shell is gone?

2011-05-07 Thread cornel panceac
2011/5/7 drago01 > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > since two days ago, gnome shell is no longer starting here. changing the > > "forced fallback mode" to on or off was of no use. any known way to get > it > > back? > > > > $ lspci -nn | grep -i vga > > 00:02.0 VGA compa

[Fedora QA] #190: Proventester Mentor Request

2011-05-07 Thread Fedora QA
#190: Proventester Mentor Request -+-- Reporter: gixugif | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Compo

F-15 Branched report: 20110507 changes

2011-05-07 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sat May 7 13:15:44 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- cpm-0.23-0.3.beta.fc12.x86_64 requires libdotconf-1.0.so.0()(64bit) db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0 dh-make-0.

Re: Fedora 15 and cannot unpin application from the taskbar

2011-05-07 Thread Jason D. Clinton
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:19, Leslie S Satenstein wrote: > I dragged to the taskbar, the system update command, when I really wanted > to drag the solitaire application. Then I dragged solitaire there again and > it is there twice (2nd time was accident). > Alt-right-click instead of just right-c

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 15 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

2011-05-07 Thread Beartooth
On Fri, 06 May 2011 12:25:34 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:21 +, BeartoothHOS wrote: [] >> Even if I had the time, it would take me months or years of study >> to become able to follow at that level, alas! But I'm glad to do what I >> can without tha

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-05-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.0.14-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-05-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.0.14-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/couchdb-1.0.2-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1400.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates

Re: shell is gone?

2011-05-07 Thread drago01
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:13 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > since two days ago, gnome shell is no longer starting here. changing the > "forced fallback mode" to on or off was of no use. any known way to get it > back? > > $ lspci -nn | grep -i vga > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corp

shell is gone?

2011-05-07 Thread cornel panceac
since two days ago, gnome shell is no longer starting here. changing the "forced fallback mode" to on or off was of no use. any known way to get it back? $ lspci -nn | grep -i vga 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics Device [8086:3582] (rev 02

Control auto update from non authorized user Why justification

2011-05-07 Thread Leslie S Satenstein
There are times when it is OK to allow an automatic update. But there are also times when only the administrator account should be allowed to do it.  I can control this by eliminating that entry from the non-authorized user menu, and still keep it for the authorized user (I decide who is authori

Re: Software update should not run on any logon except...

2011-05-07 Thread Richard Hughes
On 7 May 2011 13:22, Leslie S Satenstein wrote: > I think that allowing dependency files may be a potential security breach. Why? Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-05-07 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.0.14-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmodplug-0.8.7-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda

Re: Software update should not run on any logon except...

2011-05-07 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 05:22:04AM -0700, Leslie S Satenstein wrote: > The automatic update is a great tool. However, on a regular user account, it > can be clicked to run, and when it does, it asks if new dependency files > should > be included in the update. I think that allowing dependency f

Software update should not run on any logon except...

2011-05-07 Thread Leslie S Satenstein
The automatic update is a great tool.   However, on a regular user account, it can be clicked to run, and when it does, it asks if new dependency files should be included in the update.  I think that allowing dependency files may be a potential security breach.  In fact, why should any user be

rawhide report: 20110507 changes

2011-05-07 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat May 7 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal-storage.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libhal.so.1()(64bit) beldi-0.9.25-3.fc15.x8

Introduction

2011-05-07 Thread Gixugif
Hey guys, I'm happy to be joining the Fedora BugZappers. I've been using Fedora for a few years now .Back then it was only on FC10! I'm still surprised at how fast new versions of all the Linux distros are released. Anyway, I absolutely love using Fedora, Linux, and open-source software in general

Re: GNOME shell broken after suspend and resume for driver r300_dri

2011-05-07 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/5/7 Adam Williamson: > well, prior to f15, breaking 3D after suspend isn't massively important > - certainly ranks behind many other radeon bugs the maintainers would > have put first in priority. Of course, Shell changes that a bit. I'd > recommend you update the bug with the new info (it's s