I just did an yum update, the dependency issue seems to be solved.
--
vamsi
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 04:31 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> > Probably something I did, can anyone shed light on the following?
> >
> >
> > $ sudo yum update
> > Loaded plugins:
On 04/15/2011 04:31 PM, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> Probably something I did, can anyone shed light on the following?
>
>
> $ sudo yum update
> Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package ad
Compose started at Fri Apr 15 13:15:15 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
Probably something I did, can anyone shed light on the following?
$ sudo yum update
Loaded plugins: langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package adwaita-cursor-theme.noarch 0:3.0.0-1.fc15 will be updated
---> Pac
Dne 14.4.2011 19:33, Sree napsal(a):
> I'd like to join the fedora bugzappers team. I have a good knowledge
> about linux, and specifically fedora. I've been using fedora for about 3
> years now and I guess it's time I try and give something back to the
> community :)
Thank you very much.
> Also,
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-04-15/f-15-blocker-review.2011-04-15-17.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-b
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor-0.2.1.29-1300.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proftpd-1.3.3e-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdelibs-4.5.5-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/m
-0.18.4021svn.fc14
luci-0.24.0-2.fc14
ntfs-3g-2011.4.12-1.fc14
python-rhev-0.9-1.20110316git.fc14
rawstudio-2.0-1.fc14
rubygem-kwalify-0.7.2-3.fc14
sepostgresql-9.0.3-20110415.fc14
sugar-0.92.1-1.fc14
sugar-datastore-0.92.1-1.fc14
sugar-toolkit-0.92.1-1.fc14
tomcat6
On 04/12/2011 11:22 AM, James Laska wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 11:02 -0400, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681582
>>
>> This hangs a system with just one LV snapshot for about 5 minutes at
>> shutdown. Disabling lvm2-monitor.service fixes the shutdown pro
During the blocker meeting today, a greeter bug came up [1] but we
weren't sure if this is affecting the live images.
Using a recent live image, has anyone been dumped to gdm with an empty
user list?
Tim
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678236
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:24:51 -0600, OP wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> >>> don't get into raw
On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 19:27 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
> >
> > The testcase pages for Spice seem to be empty. See for example:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Virtualization_Spice_VirtManager_Setup
> >
>
> They
On 04/15/2011 09:02 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
>
>> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
>>> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
>>
>> This has probably be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/2011 10:04 AM, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 18:30 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
>> I just noticed this on a fresh install of F15 from the Beta RC2 media and
>> I'm not sure if there is a problem.
>>
>> I have separate LVs for home and
- Original Message
> From: Joshua Andrews
> To: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases
>
> Sent: Thu, April 14, 2011 1:37:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Virtualbox upgrade fedora 14 to 15 RC 2 -- video driver ABI error
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> > From: David
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:27:39 -0600, OP wrote:
> On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> > don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
>
> This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n
On 04/15/2011 03:59 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
This has probably been discussed before, but why not import all newer f(n-1)
builds automatically into rawhide? Might provide so
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 18:30 -0600, Tim Flink wrote:
> I just noticed this on a fresh install of F15 from the Beta RC2 media and I'm
> not sure if there is a problem.
>
> I have separate LVs for home and root, and it looks like they're both mounted
> multiple times:
>
> /dev/mapper/vg_testlap-lv
On 04/15/2011 05:41 PM, Andre Robatino wrote
> Seems like it's pointless to have No Frozen Rawhide when it's usually behind
> Branched anyway. Is AutoQA expected to eventually prevent builds happening
> later on Rawhide? Or is it impractical to be that strict? (I seem to remember
> someone saying s
Peter Robinson gmail.com> writes:
> Its because people are just building packages on F-15 branch. They
> don't get into rawhide until they hit F-15 stable.
>
> They should really be building for rawhide first and then merging the
> package repo back into F-15 and building it there, then submitti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/14/2011 12:33 AM, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> SELinux is preventing /sbin/iwconfig from using the sys_module capability.
> * Plugin sys_module (99.5 confidence) suggests *
> If you do not believe that /sbin/iwconfig s
#173: Improve the install sources tests to adapt F-15 anaconda
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15
Co
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Why are many rawhide packages lagging so far behind F15 lately? For example,
> in
> rawhide, many gnome packages including gnome-panel are still at 2.91. Does it
> have anything to do with the trouble generating deltas (
> https://fedoraho
Why are many rawhide packages lagging so far behind F15 lately? For example, in
rawhide, many gnome packages including gnome-panel are still at 2.91. Does it
have anything to do with the trouble generating deltas (
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4610 ) ?
--
test mailing list
test@lists.f
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 07:14:44 +0200, JB wrote:
>
> Somebody has seen this too?
See thread(s) two days ago. Looking up the update ticket in bodhi would
work, too.
> sudo yum update
> libjs.so.1()(64bit)
> Updated By: 1:js-1.8.5-3.fc15.x86_64 (updates-testing)
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
