When installing over the network and providing IP address through boot
options I noticed in the log a message saying it couldn't find
updates.img with the reason "name resolution error". As I did not expect
to load a updates.img this didn't effect me. But further on in the
installation I saw no
This is already filed: Bug #692196
Koos
Op 30-3-2011 21:47, Adam Williamson schreef:
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:35 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
Manual disk setup with basic video was nominal except that
I was unable to enter a static IP during install as the address
field went blan
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 07:27:24AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 03:20 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
> >> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 09:00:03AM +0800, bsfmig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14, Scott Robbins wrote:
>
> As it was a virtual machine (I guess that's the reason) Gnome 3 failed
> to load. I then enabled 3D acceleration in VBox and gave it the
> maximum allowable memory (128M
On 03/31/2011 03:20 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
>> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and that in /etc/sudoers,
>> wheel is already able to execute all commands
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 02:14, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > > > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an i
Just did a new install on a netbook--this time I went for my usual
minimal installation. It failed on bind-libs. This strikes me as ood
for two reasons--why would bind-libs be included in a minimal
installation, and why would it cause the installation to fail?
I thought I had seen, somewhere a
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> It looks as if, from this one test install, as if adding the user to
> admin users automatically adds them to wheel, and that in /etc/sudoers,
> wheel is already able to execute all commands (whereas in the past, that
> line was commented out
On 03/30/2011 07:35 PM, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> No wonder
> OpenSuse and Ubuntu are looking for something else.
Do you got some referrense backing that up with regards to OpenSuse?
Just a bit curios given that the upstream Gnome3 releases are OpenSuse
and hosted [1] @ OpenSuse
JBG
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvirt-0.8.2-3.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.21-12.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tor
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:26:13PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
>
> I've seen quite a few comparison reviews and so on, so I'm not sure we'd
> be providing anything new by doing another evaluation.
To side with Adam on this, most reviews are dated within 3 months
anyway. Seriously, evil
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:35 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> Manual disk setup with basic video was nominal except that
> I was unable to enter a static IP during install as the address
> field went blank as soon as I entered an address.
Is there a reason you chose basic video? Did you
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 08:44:00PM +0200, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> On 30/03/2011 19:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Selecting the NTP checkbox during firstboot should probably bring up a
> > network connection if one isn't already up, though.
> Kindly please provide me with the web address where I
Manual disk setup with basic video was nominal except that
I was unable to enter a static IP during install as the address
field went blank as soon as I entered an address.
Once installed, Gnome failed on login and logged me out
immediately. XFCE did work but the icons in the upper
right were jum
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 19:04 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > The differences between various virt suites are pretty well known,
> > really...
>
> Well I was personally thinking about graphical application usage
> comparison against virt-ma
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting #3
# Date: 2011-03-25
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings,
This Friday is April 1st. I was trying to cook up something clever for
the blocker meeting, without causing too much heart
On 03/30/2011 06:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> The differences between various virt suites are pretty well known,
> really...
Well I was personally thinking about graphical application usage
comparison against virt-manager but since you mentioned that the
differences is well know then there is
On 03/30/2011 06:44 PM, Johan Scheepers wrote:
> Kindly please provide me with the web address where I may find this
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/15-Beta.TC1/
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/tes
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 18:40 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >>> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso
On 30/03/2011 19:50, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>>> Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
>>>
>>> No glitches encountered during the install.
>>>
>>> On
On 03/30/2011 06:29 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
>> Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
>> in
On 03/30/2011 05:50 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Selecting the NTP checkbox during firstboot should probably bring up a
> network connection if one isn't already up, though.
Hum not sure that would be something we wanted as in application to have
the control start and stop over network connection
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:20 -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
>
> Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
> interested in people trying out kvm virtualizatio
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:14 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> As it was a virtual machine (I guess that's the reason) Gnome 3 failed
> to load. I then enabled 3D acceleration in VBox and gave it the
> maximum allowable memory (128MB), and tried again. (This doesn't
> affect me in real life, where I
On 03/30/2011 12:14 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> I just did a default installation in Virtual Box, using the netboot.iso.
Since Fedora ships qemu-kvm and not VirtualBox, I would be more
interested in people trying out kvm virtualization to give our own
products better testing.
--
Eric Blake eb
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:50:56AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
> > >
> > > No glitches encountered d
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:44 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> > Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
> >
> > No glitches encountered during the install.
> >
> > One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:36 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
>
> No glitches encountered during the install.
>
> One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during the install so firstboot
> isn't
> network connected for the NTP
Downloaded BETA.TC1 x86_64 DVD.iso and did an install on a VBox guest.
No glitches encountered during the install.
One nit: NetworkManager isn't activated during the install so firstboot
isn't
network connected for the NTP setup dialogue.
Looks good to me.
--
G.Wolfe Woodbury
aka redwolfe (p
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, that's not exactly right. We don't expect everyone to be able to
> reinstall all the time. To help with the formal validation testing
> linked in the announcement mail you need to do a fresh install, but if
> you just want to follow
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 04:56 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:12 +0530, Frederic Muller wrote:
> > On 03/30/2011 09:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:29 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > > Fedora 15 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to th
Filed this bug as bug #692196 on bugzilla.
Koos.
Op 30-3-2011 15:02, A.J. Werkman schreef:
Radek came up with a solution to the ipv6 boot option problem. This
solution however rose another question: Why is there a prefix field in
the UI but in the boot options the ipv6 parameter does not want
Last build of gnome-shell (2.91.93-3) from koji solved dependencies
problems around libtelepathy-logger.
Le lundi 28 mars 2011 à 20:29 +0200, Pierre Jaury a écrit :
> I also lost some icons and my background on rawhide, plus got errors
> about glib schemas (which actualy make me grumpy too).
>
>
On 03/30/2011 03:01 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 11:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/30/2011 10:02 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 10:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/30/2011 09:14 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I'm runn
Radek came up with a solution to the ipv6 boot option problem. This
solution however rose another question: Why is there a prefix field in
the UI but in the boot options the ipv6 parameter does not want a
prefix? I would think that either
- the prefix is relevant and then ipv6 boot option shoul
Hi,
When I boot up in runlevel 3 I see a delay of about 30 seconds in the
kernel boot messages. I was wondering if this could correlate to the
issue you discussed here.
Koos.
Op 30-3-2011 15:01, Panu Matilainen schreef:
On 03/30/2011 11:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/30/2011 10:02 AM,
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 08:55 +0200, A.J. Werkman wrote:
> I filled this bug in another setting, but I think the undelying problem
> is the same. Bug number is 691664.
>
> Are there screenshots that you want in particular? As I recall the
> information on the screen wasn't that exciting.
Appears
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 13:12:12 +0530, Frederic wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 09:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:29
> -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Fedora 15 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
> pages for download links and testing instructions.
>
> Live i
On 03/30/2011 12:45 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I just spent a long and frustrating night trying to recover my system
> from what I believed was a complete hang on startup. It turns out that
> it was just pausing for several minutes.
>
> I was finally able to track it down to these two lines in my /e
On 03/30/2011 11:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 10:02 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 10:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> On 03/30/2011 09:14 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running F15 with gnome-shel
I just spent a long and frustrating night trying to recover my system
from what I believed was a complete hang on startup. It turns out that
it was just pausing for several minutes.
I was finally able to track it down to these two lines in my /etc/fstab:
UUID=67a74931-48ac-4bdd-91d2-3e788398d4
--- On Tue, 3/29/11, Mike Chambers wrote:
> From: Mike Chambers
> Subject: Re: How do I add startup programs in Gnome 3? (Solved), ...
> (autologin SOLVED)
> To: "For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases"
>
> Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 6:34 PM
> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 18:17 -
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 13:12 +0530, Frederic Muller wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 09:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:29 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
> > > Fedora 15 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
> > > pages for download links and testing instructi
On 03/30/2011 10:02 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 10:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 03/30/2011 09:14 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I'm running F15 with gnome-shell.
Having the following effect: after having entered the login password
On 03/30/2011 10:22 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 09:14 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>> On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm running F15 with gnome-shell.
>>>
>>> Having the following effect: after having entered the login password, it
>>> takes about 10-15 se
On 03/30/2011 09:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:29 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
Fedora 15 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Live images are no
On 03/30/2011 09:14 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi,
I'm running F15 with gnome-shell.
Having the following effect: after having entered the login password, it
takes about 10-15 secs until the session is running and the gnome-shell
panel appears at t
On 03/30/2011 08:07 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running F15 with gnome-shell.
>
> Having the following effect: after having entered the login password, it
> takes about 10-15 secs until the session is running and the gnome-shell
> panel appears at the desktop's top. For me, that extreme
48 matches
Mail list logo
