Hello,
I am Ashwin Mansinghka from Kolkata, India.
I have experience in system administration and wireless communication.
I have used Redhat and then Fedora since year 2000, and wish to contribute to
fedoraproject.
I would need some initial hand holding to get the feel of triaging, all help
fr
On 03/18/2011 05:04 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> Could you please add a _little bit_ of punctuation to that very long
>> sentence above?
>
> Hum not following my English is not that good as most people are aware
> of.
>
> If I I'm
Compose started at Fri Mar 18 13:15:26 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:26 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Ok I think this is clearer. You are wondering:
>
> 1) What is QA's charter, and who has chartered it
Well normally I would think it would be our responsibility ( QA
community )
> 2) What is QA governance methodology and who decide
2011/3/18 Jóhann B. :
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> Actually for the entire email as it comes across very rambling and
>> unfocused. Could you rewrite and resend?
>
> Take three all put together hopefully clearer..
>
> There was a recent topic raised on [1] wit
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 14:07 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Actually for the entire email as it comes across very rambling and
> unfocused. Could you rewrite and resend?
Take three all put together hopefully clearer..
There was a recent topic raised on [1] with regards it was difficult to
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 20:25 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Could you please add a _little bit_ of punctuation to that very long
> sentence above?
Hum not following my English is not that good as most people are aware
of.
If I I'm getting you right you want me rephrase clear it up and to break
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi, somebody has been successful in booting into runlevel s (=1) or 3?
>
> I tried this by adding a "s" or "3" into the grub boot line (as sucessfully
> in previous Fedora versions), the system hangs up after the kernel booted,
> obviously if the desi
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 13:25, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:09:41 +, Jóhann wrote:
>
>> There was a recent topic raised on [1] with regards it was difficult to
>> find information how Fedora is governed and there has been lot of QA
>> decided this QA voted that in our histo
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:09:41 +, Jóhann wrote:
> There was a recent topic raised on [1] with regards it was difficult to
> find information how Fedora is governed and there has been lot of QA
> decided this QA voted that in our history which may look confusing to
> outsiders and our own comm
On 03/18/2011 06:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 17:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
>>> This also applies to the question of which spins block the release.
>>> That's not something that is defined in the criteria, or that should be.
>>> It's an issue for the Board a
There was a recent topic raised on [1] with regards it was difficult to
find information how Fedora is governed and there has been lot of QA
decided this QA voted that in our history which may look confusing to
outsiders and our own community since QA has never have voted any QA
board to handle
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F-15-Beta Blocker Review#2
==
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2011-03-18/f-15-beta-blocker.2011-03-18-17.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.o
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 17:17 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > This also applies to the question of which spins block the release.
> > That's not something that is defined in the criteria, or that should be.
> > It's an issue for the Board and the Spins SIG, which have been
> > discussing i
On 03/18/2011 06:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Joachim Backes (joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de) said:
Did you solved that?
Yes. The reason was that /bin/su had no owner-s-bit. After adding
the sbit (chmod u+s /bin/su) I got rid from these problems.
... How did you install? To what filesystem t
Joachim Backes (joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de) said:
> >Did you solved that?
>
> Yes. The reason was that /bin/su had no owner-s-bit. After adding
> the sbit (chmod u+s /bin/su) I got rid from these problems.
... How did you install? To what filesystem type?
Bill
--
test mailing list
test@list
On 03/18/2011 06:25 PM, Adam Pribyl wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joachim Backes wrote:
Having a problem in F15 with screen locking: after having locked the screen,
I can't unlock the screen because the pwd is rejected.
As a workaraound, I use the user switch button which lets me relog into my
r
On 03/18/2011 10:39 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Personally I feel that everything should get an equal treatment within
> the community hence we should have a process that treats each spin
> equally thus we should either focus on what ever is currently
> implemented as an "Default" or al
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Having a problem in F15 with screen locking: after having locked the screen,
> I can't unlock the screen because the pwd is rejected.
>
> As a workaraound, I use the user switch button which lets me relog into my
> running session.
>
> Any additional
On 03/18/2011 05:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
As James said, that's considerably beyond the scope of both this thread
and this group. It's not QA's job to define the vision of the project,
it's our job to validate the release process and the released products
that we*do* have. If you want to ch
On 03/18/2011 03:52 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I'd like to see some spelled out criteria for determining which spins can
> block
> a release, I don't think all spins being able to block a release is a good
> idea, with the way spins are handled now. Personally I'd like to see criteria
> that all
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:14 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 02:27 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >> I disagree with this. A lot of what we want tested needs a graphical
> >> desktop.
> >> > If we were to ship an Alpha without a working desktop, we wouldn't get
> >> > much
> >> >
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:40:09 +0530
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 02:04 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > Also, FYI, I will soon replace the above space with a page that just
> > links to koji builds of these. This will be much faster and better
> > moving forward
>
> How is Koji's support f
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 14:11:59 +,
"\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" wrote:
>
> Due to historical reasons the readiness of the KDE spin has had the
> ability to block the final release of the "Default" spin hence I
> propose that no spin can block the release of the "Default" what ever
> tha
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 15:14 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 03/18/2011 02:27 PM, James Laska wrote:
> >> I disagree with this. A lot of what we want tested needs a graphical
> >> desktop.
> >> > If we were to ship an Alpha without a working desktop, we wouldn't get
> >> > much
> >> >
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 15:14:41 +,
"\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" wrote:
> ( Rawhide users/reporters should know it's broken in the first place and
> provide feedback )
By alpha we are working with 'branched' not 'rawhide'. The point remains
valid, but using the wrong name for it might cause
On 03/18/2011 02:27 PM, James Laska wrote:
>> I disagree with this. A lot of what we want tested needs a graphical desktop.
>> > If we were to ship an Alpha without a working desktop, we wouldn't get
>> > much
>> > feedback (other than that the desktop doesn't work).
That's mostly cause we are
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 09:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:58:26 +,
> "\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" wrote:
> > On 03/17/2011 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Alpha: Actually account for firstboot, which we completely ignored until
> > > now. The criterion abou
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:58:26 +,
"\"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson\"" wrote:
> On 03/17/2011 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Alpha: Actually account for firstboot, which we completely ignored until
> > now. The criterion about 'booting to a working desktop' was split into
> > two and now cove
Given that we are revisting the release criteria I propose that we
update ourselves to more recent times to reflect the project more
accurately.
Due to historical reasons the readiness of the KDE spin has had the
ability to block the final release of the "Default" spin hence I
propose that
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 13:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Can everyone let me know what they think of these changes? Thanks!
>
> There may be a few more coming later as I go through the blocker meeting
> logs.
I hope you don't mind ... but my brain+eyes needed to see a patch
(available at http:
On 03/18/2011 02:04 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Also, FYI, I will soon replace the above space with a page that just
> links to koji builds of these. This will be much faster and better
> moving forward
How is Koji's support for live images implemented? Does it use
livecd-creator or copy code or w
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 20:35 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
>
> > Should there be an explicit requirement for Final at least, that the image
> > itself have a working mediacheck?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676551
>
Gnome 3 failed to run on an Intel system with Nvidia GT-460SE.
BTW Nvidia has 59 per cent of the video card gaming market.
The Thursday nightly build apparently ran Gnome 3 on a system
with ATI board, but the hard disk install resulted in an unrepairable
file system that would not get past the gru
On 03/17/2011 08:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Alpha: Actually account for firstboot, which we completely ignored until
> now. The criterion about 'booting to a working desktop' was split into
> two and now covers firstboot. I also explicitly called out encryption
> here, and tweaked the language
Hi, somebody has been successful in booting into runlevel s (=1) or 3?
I tried this by adding a "s" or "3" into the grub boot line (as
sucessfully in previous Fedora versions), the system hangs up after the
kernel booted, obviously if the desired bootlevel seems to be ready.
Same problem if I
36 matches
Mail list logo
