2011/3/10 tim.lauridsen:
> Run this to get the Fedora 14 Default, if you like that better
>
> gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.interface font-name "DejaVu Sans 10"
dconf-editor allows to do this in a more user friendly way. ~C
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
http
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 23:02 -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > I actually rather like it...
> I dont mind the font, i do mind that its utf8 support seems to be lacking
> greatly, I get ?? for alot of characters. makes for a difficult time reading
> things
pango/freetype/what-the-hell-ever should
2011/3/10 Mike Chambers:
> This may have been discussed, but are the fonts and/or appearance of the
> apps that run gonna be changed or get better? Just seems the fonts are
> not even close to what F14 looks like. Seem dull, not to bright, and
> not real thick either.
The Cantarell desktop font
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> This may have been discussed, but are the fonts and/or appearance of the
> apps that run gonna be changed or get better? Just seems the fonts are
> not even close to what F14 looks like. Seem dull, not to bright, and
> not real thick eithe
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 07:58:41 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:33 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:31 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 17:12, Mike Chamb
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:19 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
> localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
> see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
> intentio
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:33 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:31 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 17:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And the appearance so far seems dull and no
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 15:19 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
> localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
> see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
> intentio
minicom-2.5-5.fc15
mirage-0.9.5.2-1.fc15
nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-18.fc15
perl-Package-Stash-0.26-1.fc15
policycoreutils-2.0.85-19.fc15
saphire-1.3.1-1.fc15
skkdic-20110309-1.T1520.fc15
sugar-pippy-40-1.fc15
sugar-xoirc-9-1.fc15
system-config-language-1.3.5-7.fc15
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:31 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 17:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
> > >
> > > And the appearance so far seems dull and no color to it, well at least
> > > to the apps that are open. Belo
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 17:18 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 17:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
> >
> > And the appearance so far seems dull and no color to it, well at least
> > to the apps that are open. Below is URL to a screenshot I took of
> > evolution being open and ho
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 17:12, Mike Chambers wrote:
> This may have been discussed, but are the fonts and/or appearance of the
> apps that run gonna be changed or get better? Just seems the fonts are
> not even close to what F14 looks like. Seem dull, not to bright, and
> not real thick either.
>
This may have been discussed, but are the fonts and/or appearance of the
apps that run gonna be changed or get better? Just seems the fonts are
not even close to what F14 looks like. Seem dull, not to bright, and
not real thick either.
And the appearance so far seems dull and no color to it, wel
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 11:55 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:08:53 -0600,
> John Watzke wrote:
> >Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a3
# F15-Beta Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-03-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks!
What use is an Alpha, if we didn't follow it up with a Beta?
The Beta blocker review meetings start this Friday at high-noon (EST) in
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.2.15-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-File-FcntlLock-0.12-1.fc13,perl-Mail-Box-2.097-1.fc13
http
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libcgroup-0.36.2-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.4.4-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libxml2-2.7.7-3.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 18:06 +0800, He Rui wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the
> feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are
> supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2].
> Among these, I pr
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> krb5-auth-dialog
I ran sudo rpm -e krb5-auth-dialog and it sure ran for a long time, apparently
doing a whole lot of stuff, but there were no dependency complaints and when it
finished, the systray icon was gone.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day
---+
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Test Day | V
Hello,
I'm really glad we successfully finished our internationalization and
localization testing marathon for these release cycle. I'm also glad to
see that some bugs are already closed or modified. For Fedora 15 the
intention was to arrange these Test Days earlier than we did for Fedora
14 becau
> "PdC" == Petrus de Calguarium writes:
PdC> Hovering over it shows "Your credentials have expired" and when I
PdC> clicked it, an empty window appeared, and after a long, long delay,
PdC> it filled in with the following information: Couldn't acquire
PdC> kerberos ticket: 'Cannot resolve netw
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:08:53 -0600,
John Watzke wrote:
>Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a30ed72f7bdec5bc57f9d9d3e5
>
>GDM was accidentally released wit
I just updated my f15 system to yesterday's updates (08.iii.2011), those
including kernel-2.6.38-0.rc8.git0.1.fc15 &c.
I rebooted the machine, as I wanted to run the new kernel.
When kdm logged me in, I saw 2 keys with a red 'x' in the system tray. Hovering
over it shows "Your credentials have
On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 12:01 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 08:19 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > Awesome, thanks for the list. I'll try and make sure they all get karma
> > and either ensure the nightly has them or do a custom spin later
> > tonight.
>
> I've pushe
Take a look at the Bodhi page for this package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/accountsservice-0.6.5-1.fc15,gdm-2.91.93-1.fc15?_csrf_token=579900300f9483a30ed72f7bdec5bc57f9d9d3e5
GDM was accidentally released without the accountsservice package
update. If you've already gotten GDM
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 08:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 10:56 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > > Yikes, I didn't know! The third one is scheduled for 7th April, if
> > > that's a bad day we can change it. We can even change this one still if
> > > it's a really bad ide
Greetings,
Now let's continue the discussion[1] about TCMS management. After the
feature comparison between wiki and nitrate, the features which are
supported in current wiki, but not in nitrate have been identified[2].
Among these, I priorized some of them as Must-have features, which were
summar
2011/3/9 Rob Healey:
> To those of you who have not updated to gnome-2.91.91:
>
> I would exclude the gdm package as it would not allow me to log back into my
> computer either as normal or root user!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683157
The trouble actually started with gdm-2.91.92
29 matches
Mail list logo
