#174: proventester request: caillon
-+--
Reporter: caillon | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Com
On 02/28/2011 01:06 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Yay for abuse of the system :\
>
> I think this is one of the main reasons the team or maintainer SHOULD
> NOT be able to add karma to packages. The 'it works for me' stuff should
> not apply to major chunks of the OS without independent feedback.
I
On 28/02/2011 6:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:12 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>
>> I upgraded my home box to F15-pre-alpha over the weekend, first with yum
>> and when the result was a utterly broken heap thought oh well it's the
>> unsupported way, then reinstalled from
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:12 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> I upgraded my home box to F15-pre-alpha over the weekend, first with yum
> and when the result was a utterly broken heap thought oh well it's the
> unsupported way, then reinstalled from scratch and got the very same
> broken heap... a
On 02/28/2011 08:25 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:06 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
>
>> , running 'startx'
>> from a vt just gives me a blank background. I'm posting this
>> from Xfce.
>>
>> Don't know the root cause but using the fallback force
On 02/28/2011 07:06 AM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:50 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:54:50 -0800,
>>>Rob Healey wrote:
I must ask again, please, is fc15 updates-testing g
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> This list is fine. It's generally not a good idea to post five
> completely different issues as 'addenda' to a thread about another
> different issue, though. It only leads to confusion :)
THANKS for your reply --- it is fully appreciat
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 23:06 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> , running 'startx'
> from a vt just gives me a blank background. I'm posting this
> from Xfce.
>
> Don't know the root cause but using the fallback force method posted
> by mclasen will get you in to fallback m
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 22:14 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> BTW, what happened to wobbly windows? Was that someone else?
That's part of compiz.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailin
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 18:22 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> not crashing, but don't mean it's *ready*. Hell, I couldn't find away
> to modify my firewall, change selinux options, or other system type
> config things, without having to use CLI.
Those tools have never been part of GNOME, they're Fed
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 00:27 -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> I tried fedora-qa on irc earlier this evening, but since it was my
> first irc session, perhaps the reason I didn't get a response was a
> cockpit error.
IRC varies a lot with time/date and is generally quieter on weekends.
> What's the Fed
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 23:03, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:50 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:54:50 -0800,
> > Rob Healey wrote:
> > >
> > > I must ask again, please, is fc15 updates-testing gnome*2.91.90* or
> rawhide/
> > > fc16 stable enoug
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 12:50 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 09:54:50 -0800,
> Rob Healey wrote:
> >
> > I must ask again, please, is fc15 updates-testing gnome*2.91.90* or rawhide/
> > fc16 stable enough with gnome-shell to update to either one???
>
> Maybe. gdm just go
Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> I appreciate how you clipped out the part where I said it's on the drawing
> board but it didn't make it in time. What do you want us to do? Human
> cloning is, sadly, illegal, and thus we only have the resources that we
> have.
I understand it is on the
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:48, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I think the bit that bugs me the most about gnome-shell is that if
> applications have a long title, you can't tell what the apps is. ie
> LibreOffice... by however many icons. I have to know what the icon
> colour is for what app I want to
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 22:14:08 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 02/27/2011 06:49 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
>> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to
>> view?
>> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
>> least on the desktop or something and s
On 02/27/2011 06:49 PM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
> least on the desktop or something and seen rather easily?
>
Interesting thread. I'm having fun finding way
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 21:37 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:57 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
>
> > I don't care how hard they are working on it. Never said the developers
> > weren't doign a good job. I complimented on it was lot better since F14
> > was being developed.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 20:49, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> Grow up and act like adults, please. All of you. On both sides of the
> issue.
>
Condescending, patronizing tone is not welcome.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Holy cow, what incredibly pointless bickering.
Grow up and act like adults, please. All of you. On both sides of the issue.
You're all right.
GNOME 3 is going to be awesome. People are working really hard on it,
and what they're creating is really sweet.
When it ships, it will be missing a lot
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 19:55, Andy Lawrence wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jason D. Clinton
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> It will be considered "ready" without widgets.
>>
>>
> Without widgets,
>
No, without applets and without a new widget system. System tray icons are
still there: in fallback
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 20:29, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> > Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> > already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting
> GNOME 3
> > ready. Your email isn't particularly helpf
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:57 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote:
> I don't care how hard they are working on it. Never said the developers
> weren't doign a good job. I complimented on it was lot better since F14
> was being developed. But does NOT mean I have to agree bout pushing it
> out the door wit
Once upon a time, Jason D. Clinton said:
> Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting GNOME 3
> ready. Your email isn't particularly helpful though.
Your email isn't particularly helpful either.
How
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 12:28 +0100, Massimo Gengarelli wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> with the latest update of Polkit (from version 0.98 to version 0.100
> required by GNOME3), I'm experiencing some issues related to the
> authentication agent: it seems like that the GNOME Authentication Agent
> is no long
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 19:22 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
> Patches welcome. Alternatively, you could pay someone to write it who
> already isn't spending every spare, waking moment working on getting
> GNOME 3 ready. Your email isn't particularly helpful though.
I don't care how hard they ar
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
>
>
> It will be considered "ready" without widgets.
>
>
Without widgets, firewall control, vino, any method for user groups/control,
selinux menu, ability to reboot, menu system missing "programming", no
desktop. This is just what came to m
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 18:22, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Pretty half baked if ask me. There is no "include it at a later date,
> or next release" option, as that is just trying to get something out the
> door but not include anything else. If applets are going away, no
> problem, then include the
On Sun, 2011-02-27 at 18:02 -0600, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 17:49, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want
> to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is
> viewable at
>
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 17:49, Mike Chambers wrote:
> Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to view?
> Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
> least on the desktop or something and seen rather easily?
>
As has been discussed to death all ove
Compose started at Sun Feb 27 13:15:37 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.9-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit)
Soo, where is the weather applet, and others that I might want to view?
Or where/how do I add a applet type thing so weather is viewable at
least on the desktop or something and seen rather easily?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"The best town on Earth!"
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedo
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 05:28, Massimo Gengarelli wrote:
> I'd like to know if someone else is experiencing this bug too or if I
> mismatched something somewhere.
>
Same here.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Compose started at Sun Feb 27 08:15:28 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
R-hdf5-1.6.9-10.fc15.x86_64 requires hdf5 = 0:1.8.5.patch1
audacious-plugin-xmp-3.3.0-6.fc15.x86_64 requires audacious(plugin-api)
= 0:17
balsa
Hi,
I am Aravind vijayan from India.My IRC nick is Aravindv_ .You can reach
me on my mobile on:919446473742.I have been using fedora for 5 years. I have
a bugzilla account and i have reported many bugs.I love to work with
fedora.I have experience with ABRT.I wish to do something for fedora and
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:02:11 + (UTC), Andre wrote:
> > The dist tag is part of the R in EVR, however, so whenever you rpmbuild
> > something in order to _rebuild_ it, you need to bump the R to turn the build
> > into a valid update. For dist-specific rebuilds, you would append your own
> > lea
Michael Schwendt gmail.com> writes:
> The dist tag is part of the R in EVR, however, so whenever you rpmbuild
> something in order to _rebuild_ it, you need to bump the R to turn the build
> into a valid update. For dist-specific rebuilds, you would append your own
> least-significant release val
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 11:50:09 + (UTC), Andre wrote:
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
> > Well, I know it looks odd, but I'm not trying to be perverse, on the
> > contrary. I needed to generate F14 deltarpm binary rpms that use the new
> > compression, but wanted to use no more th
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
> Well, I know it looks odd, but I'm not trying to be perverse, on the
> contrary. I needed to generate F14 deltarpm binary rpms that use the new
> compression, but wanted to use no more than necessary from F15. It's
> necessary to use F15's xz packages,
Hi list,
with the latest update of Polkit (from version 0.98 to version 0.100
required by GNOME3), I'm experiencing some issues related to the
authentication agent: it seems like that the GNOME Authentication Agent
is no longer registered into the DBus, thus making most of the
applications which r
40 matches
Mail list logo
