#160: I would like to be a proventester
--+-
Reporter: severnaya| Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Mi
#152: Test Cases Management
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.37-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mantis-1.1.8-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ajaxterm-0.10-13.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.37-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mantis-1.1.8-5.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwmf-0.2.8.4-27.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 11:08 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:01:39 +0100
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > Well, then the update submitter has deleted the old ticket, which IMO
> > is a MUST NOT. Several times before I've seen users referring to
> > updates they installed and whic
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:01:39 +0100
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Well, then the update submitter has deleted the old ticket, which IMO
> is a MUST NOT. Several times before I've seen users referring to
> updates they installed and which were still being offered by
> Yum/PackageKit at that time, but n
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:43:59 +, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 18:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:10:33 +0100, Michał wrote:
> >
> > > > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 18:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:10:33 +0100, Michał wrote:
>
> > > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
> > >>
> > >
> > > but is it b
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:10:33 +0100, Michał wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
> >>
> >
> > but is it broken LESS or broken MORE?
>
> For me completely :)
It's known. See its tic
hi everyone ,
I am happy to join the fedora Bug Zappers ,
Myname is raghavan , my age is 21 , I am final year student of B.tech
IT , i have been using fedora for nealy two years , i want to
contribute to fedora , it would helpfull if someone could mentor me ,
so that i can learn things in Bug Zap
2010/12/23 seth vidal :
> On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
>>
>
> but is it broken LESS or broken MORE?
For me completely :)
>
> Zing!
>
> sorry, couldn't resist.
>
> -sv
>
>
> --
> test mailin
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:54 +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
>
but is it broken LESS or broken MORE?
Zing!
sorry, couldn't resist.
-sv
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.f
Hi,
less-436-7.fc14.x86_64 seems to be broken - anyone else see it?
--
Best regards,
Michal
Sent from my fscking awesome Black Hole Generator
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Greetings All:
I have a FC14 livecd that will allow me to setup keyboard shortcuts in a
better interface that rawhide in IMHO! I would like to know which *.conf
that would be written to in the configuration files?
I could then copy and save that into the correct configuration file in
rawhide???
Hi,
I am Bamacharan Kundu, my nickname in irc.freenode is bamachrn
I am using fedora since fedora 10. presently I am working on a project
"openzilla" which is written in python, I have wrote a patch for "xnoise"
music player in vala. besides that I know java, javascript, python webframe
Django.
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 14:35 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> thanks! I'm planning to work on a mockup for the f-e-k and bodhi
> integration this afternoon to show how we envision this all being used
> to kick ass, I think that'll make it clearer.
Bodhi mockup post:
http://www.happyassassin.net/20
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again
> became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing
> package-specific test instructions, and particularly specific
> instructions for testing critical p
#154: Tracker: critical path test case creation
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15
Component: Wiki
On 23/12/2010 8:19 PM, Kåre Fiedler Christiansen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:55, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
>
>
>> Looking at this further:
>>
>> # sh -x /usr/share/dracut/modules.d/90crypt/check
>> + which cryptsetup
>> + exit 1
>> # which cryptsetup
>> /usr/bin/which: no cryptsetup in
>> (/u
#160: I would like to be a proventester
--+-
Reporter: severnaya| Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Mi
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 07:55, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Looking at this further:
>
> # sh -x /usr/share/dracut/modules.d/90crypt/check
> + which cryptsetup
> + exit 1
> # which cryptsetup
> /usr/bin/which: no cryptsetup in
> (/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin)
21 matches
Mail list logo
