Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-21 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 06:12:47PM -0500, James Laska wrote: > Something to help testers find the right src.rpm name of the > component under test? Something like that? #!/bin/bash me=$(basename $0) usage () { echo "Usage: $me " echo "where is either path to a file or an rpm package nam

Re: [Fedora QA] #158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day

2010-12-21 Thread Fedora QA
#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | V

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-21 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:11:15 + > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it > > again became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing > > package-specific test instructi

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-12-21 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.37-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mantis-1.1.8-5.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Ajaxterm-0.10-13.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-21 Thread James Laska
Thanks Adam for getting the ball rolling on this topic. On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again > became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing > package-specific test instructions, and p

Re: [Fedora QA] #158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day

2010-12-21 Thread Fedora QA
#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | V

Re: [Fedora QA] #89: Improve tracking blocker review status

2010-12-21 Thread Fedora QA
#89: Improve tracking blocker review status --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component

Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

2010-12-21 Thread Adam Williamson
Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing package-specific test instructions, and particularly specific instructions for testing critical path functions. I've been working on a process for this, and now h

Re: [Fedora QA] #158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day

2010-12-21 Thread Fedora QA
#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | V

Re: [Fedora QA] #154: Tracker: critical path test case creation

2010-12-21 Thread Fedora QA
#154: Tracker: critical path test case creation --+- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki

Re: New Tester Introduction

2010-12-21 Thread Simon Yan
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:17 PM, He Rui wrote: > Hi Hongqing, > > Glad to see you here! I know there maybe many staff for you to learn at > the beginning, but based on your background, you'll adapt the > environment and 'Fedora QA style' pretty soon. Here are some > introduction pages for your ref