On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:01 +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> [faked-up reply, I'm not on the list, ajax pointed it out to me on the
> archives. please make sure you CC me for any replies]
>
> > Unlike a mouse, these pointer devices move the mouse pointer to where
> > you touch the screen. For examp
#89: Improve tracking blocker review status
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 15:25:49 -0800,
Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings All:
>
> I know that there are too many other dependency errors in rawhide, but I am
> not asking anyone to fix it now! I would like to know what other files that
> I might have to locally re-build to make this work! I am n
#89: Improve tracking blocker review status
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component
#89: Improve tracking blocker review status
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: poelstra
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 15:25 -0800, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings All:
>
> I know that there are too many other dependency errors in rawhide, but
> I am not asking anyone to fix it now! I would like to know what other
> files that I might have to locally re-build to make this work! I am
> not too
Greetings All:
I know that there are too many other dependency errors in rawhide, but I am
not asking anyone to fix it now! I would like to know what other files that
I might have to locally re-build to make this work! I am not too good at
seeing things in a logical manner, so I hope that someon
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.12-10.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wireshark-1.2.13-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.8.1-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/up
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/udev-153-5.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.12-16.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.8.1-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wi
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/phpMyAdmin-3.3.8.1-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/exim-4.72-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/
I had this problem as well, on the x86_64 arch, for one of the late
alpha or early beta builds. I did the install on a brand new hard drive.
A few weeks elapsed, and I downloaded the release version of 14 -- the
x86_64 DVD iso. I've just installed from this as a URL installation
using the same
Hmm, I've just followed the instuctions here
(http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?30,151937,151981,quote=1), which seem
to work fine. I'm currently compiling OpenSceneGraph, and think
desktop performance is improved (gut feeling, I haven't done any
measuring). Note that I don't use systemD (yet)
Stefa
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 21:46 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
>
>
> 2010/11/30 Adam Williamson
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:12 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > is there a simple way to test any of the (below) two kernel
> patches in
> > fedora?
> >
> >
>
2010/11/30 Adam Williamson
> On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:12 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> > is there a simple way to test any of the (below) two kernel patches in
> > fedora?
> >
> >
> http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/The-233-Line-Kernel-Patch-and-the-Even-Easier-Alternatives-71328.html
>
> if you
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 20:12 +0200, cornel panceac wrote:
> is there a simple way to test any of the (below) two kernel patches in
> fedora?
>
> http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/The-233-Line-Kernel-Patch-and-the-Even-Easier-Alternatives-71328.html
if you're running Rawhide you can just do the stu
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 10:51 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:31 +0100, Matthias wrote:
>
> > On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> >
> > > Things that some people see as problematic are:
> > >
> > > * Hav
is there a simple way to test any of the (below) two kernel patches in
fedora?
http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/The-233-Line-Kernel-Patch-and-the-Even-Easier-Alternatives-71328.html
--
When one door is closed, another is open.
(Robert Nesta Marley)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject
On Tue, 2010-11-30 at 07:48 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:31:31 +0100,
> Matthias Runge wrote:
> > >
> > >>> * allow packages with a %check section to go direct to stable.
> > >>
> > I think this is a bad idea. Just insert a null- %check section (package
> > gets a
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 09:31:31 +0100,
Matthias Runge wrote:
> >
> >>> * allow packages with a %check section to go direct to stable.
> >>
> I think this is a bad idea. Just insert a null- %check section (package
> gets a +1 from provenpackager, add a (pseudo-anonymous) +1 vote and
> voila: pa
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 12:24:32 +0100, Matthias wrote:
> The bug reporter will probably verify the fixture for his bug. But,
> given the fact, this new version breaks other things, this could be
> possibly covered by a test case (in best case).
A _new version_ will need to stay in updates-testing to
Compose started at Tue Nov 30 08:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
bognor-regis-0.6.11-1
On 30/11/10 10:51, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:31 +0100, Matthias wrote:
>
>> On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>>
>>> Things that some people see as problematic are:
>>>
>>> * Having to wait a week to push a
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:31:31 +0100, Matthias wrote:
> On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>
> > Things that some people see as problematic are:
> >
> > * Having to wait a week to push an update if you can't find testing
> > * Testin
On 29/11/10 19:08, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 12:40 -0500, James Laska wrote:
> Things that some people see as problematic are:
>
> * Having to wait a week to push an update if you can't find testing
> * Testing being required for packages with automated test suites
> * The de
- "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> * have a way to get interested testers notified on bodhi updates for
> packages
> they care about.
I think that's this one:
https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/339
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
25 matches
Mail list logo
