Hi,
I'm very glad to join at Fedora Bug Zappers Team. I have been working
on Fedora/Red Hat since early 2000. I have decided to contribute the
project actively, now I am mainly working on Fedora GIS Spin and
related packages.
About Myself:
Name : Viji V Nair
IRC : viji
Email : vijivijayaku...@gm
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:41 -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 04:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Not much, but I did ask kernel team if there was any reason to consider
> > it a release blocker, and they didn't seem particularly bothered.
>
> This should be added to the CommonBug
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 22:31 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 23:21:27 -0500,
> Thomas Belvin wrote:
> > I recently upgraded to Rawhide from F14 Updates-Testing. I can get
> > audio with the old kernel, but booting into the Rawhide kernel kills
> > the audio, and Gallium3D
On 11/08/2010 04:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Not much, but I did ask kernel team if there was any reason to consider
> it a release blocker, and they didn't seem particularly bothered.
This should be added to the CommonBugs page, shouldn't it? It is not
normal to have >0.00 if a system is com
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 23:21 -0500, Thomas Belvin wrote:
> I recently upgraded to Rawhide from F14 Updates-Testing. I can get
> audio with the old kernel, but booting into the Rawhide kernel kills
> the audio, and Gallium3D died after the upgrade. I can get pulse audio
> listed in SystemSettings whe
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 23:21:27 -0500,
Thomas Belvin wrote:
> I recently upgraded to Rawhide from F14 Updates-Testing. I can get
> audio with the old kernel, but booting into the Rawhide kernel kills
> the audio, and Gallium3D died after the upgrade. I can get pulse audio
> listed in SystemSett
I recently upgraded to Rawhide from F14 Updates-Testing. I can get
audio with the old kernel, but booting into the Rawhide kernel kills
the audio, and Gallium3D died after the upgrade. I can get pulse audio
listed in SystemSettings when I do "pulseaudio -k", but I still get
"Dummy Output" every whe
On 11/08/2010 11:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 00:08 -0600, Jeff Raber wrote:
>
>> Seem similar to the issue described here:
>> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094683.html
>>
>> I'm not sure if anything ever came of that discussion.
>
> Not much, b
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/seamonkey-2.0.10-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.12-10.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.1.1-27.P1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/banshee-1.6.1-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_fcgid-2.3.6-1.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/g
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dhcp-4.2.0-14.P1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.10-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 00:08 -0600, Jeff Raber wrote:
> Seem similar to the issue described here:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094683.html
>
> I'm not sure if anything ever came of that discussion.
Not much, but I did ask kernel team if there was any reason to cons
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 01:20:45 -0800
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I reinstalled F14 64 on my office computer and Pan worked correctly.
> (The standard Fedora Pan.)
> I then ran "yum update NetworkManager*" and that broke Pan's
> ability to download large yenc encoded postings.
>
> Unfortu
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 01:20:45 -0800,
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I reinstalled F14 64 on my office computer and Pan worked correctly.
> (The standard Fedora Pan.)
> I then ran "yum update NetworkManager*" and that broke Pan's
> ability to download large yenc encoded postings.
There
As always, details and IRC transcript are available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20101108
= Attendees =
People present (lines said)
* jlaska (67)
* adamw (16)
* mkrizek (6)
Unable to attend:
* rhe
* Newgle1
* wwoods
* kparal
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 06:30 -0800, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R wrote:
> I was hoping to repeat the success I had getting Pan to
> work by reinstalling Fedora on my server.
[etc]
You're unlikely to get the assistance of the maintainer - or anyone,
really - by sending twice-daily updates on your bu
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-11-08
# Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
^
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings folks,
Please be advised, while localtime() for the meeting remains the same,
the UTC time has changed (see [1] to conver
I was hoping to repeat the success I had getting Pan to
work by reinstalling Fedora on my server.
Alas, this did not happen. I installed Pan before any
updates but Pan was still broken. I install more
packages on the server. Perhaps the file that poisons
Pan was installed with the system instal
Apparently if I install the telnet server and inet,
then enable telnet server before any updates,
the telnet server works.
After the update, system>admin>services cannot
tell what the telnet server is up to, but the telnet
server remain operational.
--
Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R c...@omen.
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 02:01:18PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 01:07 PM, Juan P. Daza P. wrote:
> > This is due to a bug in the kernel:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
> >
>
> Filed a Fedora bug here to track this:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
On 11/08/2010 01:07 PM, Juan P. Daza P. wrote:
> This is due to a bug in the kernel:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
>
Filed a Fedora bug here to track this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=650934
That bug contains references to the kernel bug, the mailing list t
This is due to a bug in the kernel:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16525
--
JP
linux user: 431181
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On 7 November 2010 21:11, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2010-11-07 at 14:00 +0200, Hassan Ibraheem wrote:
> > Obviously, this upgrade is messed up and I don't know what have gone
> > wrong.
> > Sorry for the long email. :)
>
> Please try this out:
>
> http://fedorasolved.org/Members/fenris02/post
Compose started at Mon Nov 8 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
abrt-gui-1.1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libnotify.so.1()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.20()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.7-2.fc1
I reinstalled F14 64 on my office computer and Pan worked correctly.
(The standard Fedora Pan.)
I then ran "yum update NetworkManager*" and that broke Pan's
ability to download large yenc encoded postings.
Unfortunately, reinstalling the NetworkManager rpms from the DVD
did not correct the problem
25 matches
Mail list logo
