Hello,
After updating a fedora rawhide KVM guest today (Nov 5 4:00 UTC), the vm
can't boot anymore, I've managed to get the output of the vm with serial
console (thanks to libguestfs and virt-edit), here's the error messages:
Failed to open syslog for logging: No such file or directory
FATAL: M
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 16:43:19 -0430,
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 11/3/10 10:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:33 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> >>> > > Could not report several bugs, will at
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-4.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-4.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/banshee-1.6.1-4.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gromacs-4.5.2-2.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.10-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gromacs-4.5.2-2.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mon
On 11/3/10 10:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 21:33 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
>>> > > Could not report several bugs, will attach errors here:
>> >
>> > Fedora 15? You must be in a timewarp.
> He's ru
A default 64 bit install on a Intel machine with Geforce 9600gt
hangs with no video signal. Installation with safe video was
nominal. Using the appropriate incantation I was able to get
the Nvidia graphics driver running. Nice to have 21st century graphics.
When installing F14 on omen.com, I sp
Thanks. I will go over there. Just thought this was a new base feature
for FC that the NetworkManager would only be controlling
On 11/04/2010 12:02 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:22:03AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>> I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my i
>
> > It's a bit strange. Isn't it?
>
> The above is from "20101104 changes" report. On the top of this
> seven and half hours later another copy of "20101103 changes" report
> showed up with a quite different content. Still not that
> surpr
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:48:03AM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Summary:
> > Added Packages: 0
> > Removed Packages: 9900
> > Modified Packages: 0
>
> It's a bit strange. Isn't it?
The above is from "20101104 changes" report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/03/2010 06:57 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
> Dear fellow tests,
>
> I see several sealerts aside from dracut error:
>
> I tried to send in report via bugzilla, but forgot my password :(
>
> I got this:
>
> browser.py:277:row_activated:TypeErr
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:22:03AM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix
> be set with RA.
>
> Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the
> suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway)
Compose started at Wed Nov 3 08:15:18 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0
1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit)
apcupsd-3.14.8-3.
I want to control the IPv6 suffix for my interfaces and let the prefix
be set with RA.
Currently I can either have the RA prefix with the MAC address for the
suffix, or I can specify a complete IPv6 address (and gateway) and
ignore RA.
The first approach causes problems with DNS if I change th
--- On Wed, 11/3/10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Subject: Re: nouveau Fedora 15 Segmentation fault at address 0x7
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wednesday, November 3, 2010, 7:03 PM
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:18 -0700,
> Antonio Olivares wrote:
> > Coul
Hi,
> Summary:
> Added Packages: 0
> Removed Packages: 9900
> Modified Packages: 0
It's a bit strange. Isn't it?
Regards,
Michal
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
17 matches
Mail list logo