selinux and file system check

2010-10-28 Thread cornel panceac
why is the selinux relabel required when the "Superblock last mount/write is in the future" error is fixed? -- When one door is closed, another is open. (Robert Nesta Marley) -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20101028 changes

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Schwendt
What's going on? What repo are "stable" updates going to currently? They are piling up broken dependencies, because they disappear from updates-testing, don't appear in development/14, and don't enter updates either. Not limited to "nss" but e.g. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.8-

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Saurabh Sharma
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Sawrub wrote: > On 10/28/2010 11:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Gušmundsson" wrote: > >> On 10/28/2010 05:23 PM, Sawrub wrote: >> >>> The installation was done using Fedora 14 Beta, will check the yum >>> logs tomorrow for sure and revert back. >>> BTW i missed to mention th

BZ#647677 - i8k fails on Dell 8xxx laptops

2010-10-28 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi all, Just reaching out to see if I can get this tested by other owners of Dell laptops. It seems the i8k module fails on the current fedora kernels - I believe due to some changes in the way gcc does optimisation. As such, the temperature monitoring, fan control etc provided by i8k doesn't

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 09:26 +0530, Sawrub wrote: > On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: > > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have > > > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread Sawrub
On 10/29/2010 01:11 AM, James Laska wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Scott Robbins
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 02:27:37PM +1100, Steven Haigh wrote: > On 29/10/10 14:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:11 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote: > >> LOL. Booting Fedora in an Apple Store? I wanna see that! :D > > > > Macs aren't only sold in Apple stores. > > Still, wh

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Steven Haigh
On 29/10/10 14:23, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:11 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote: >> LOL. Booting Fedora in an Apple Store? I wanna see that! :D > > Macs aren't only sold in Apple stores. Still, whats the point of only being *slightly* annoying... Burn a handful of F14 li

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:11 +0200, Fabian A. Scherschel wrote: > LOL. Booting Fedora in an Apple Store? I wanna see that! :D Macs aren't only sold in Apple stores. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.ne

Re: question regarding TC1

2010-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 22:49 -0400, Claude Jones wrote: > I've had TC1 up and running for a couple of weeks , now; will I be > good to just leave things as they are and have it morph into F14 when > the official release occurs? Yes. (If you're updating regularly, you essentially have F14 final alr

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:20 -0400, TK009 wrote: > +1 as someone how has applied for that group in the past only to find > out no riding lessons, no pony. *rides by on his flying unicorn* don't worry, there's nothing at all special about the qa group. Just like James says, it's just useless. *ri

question regarding TC1

2010-10-28 Thread Claude Jones
I've had TC1 up and running for a couple of weeks , now; will I be good to just leave things as they are and have it morph into F14 when the official release occurs? -- Claude Jones Brunswick, MD, USA -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraprojec

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunderbird-3.1.5-1.fc13,sunbird-1.0-0.29.b2pre.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-11.fc13 ht

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-3.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/update

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2010-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apr-util-1.3.10-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.10-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/c

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread TK009
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:17 PM, James Laska wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, >>   James Laska wrote: >> > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: >> > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:08 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, > James Laska wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: > > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have > > > both triagers, fedorabugs and prove

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 15:41:27 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: > > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have > > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. > > That's correct. Iarly lists th

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Fabian A. Scherschel
LOL. Booting Fedora in an Apple Store? I wanna see that! :D On 28 Oct 2010 18:49, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:33 +0200, Jan Wildeboer wrote: >> All, >> >> the new Macbook Air and Fedora - has anyone tried it already? From the >> specs I see the usual problems: >> >> - Nvidi

Re: Does openpgp work with seamonkey and enigma mail

2010-10-28 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 10/28/2010 02:51 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > You might try installing gnupg instead of or in addition to gnupg2. > > Jik > Thx. However, both are installed. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 16:35 -0300, iarly selbir wrote: > AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have > both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. That's correct. Iarly lists the actively managed Fedora QA FAS groups. Any other groups are ignored /

Re: Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread iarly selbir
AFAIK, this group isn't used by the real QA members, instead we have both triagers, fedorabugs and proventesters for testers purposes. - - iarlyy selbir :wq! On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Sawrub wrote: > I just noticed that i'm still not a member of 'Fedora QA Group' and my > request s

Request for Fedora QA Group

2010-10-28 Thread Sawrub
I just noticed that i'm still not a member of 'Fedora QA Group' and my request stands Unapproved. Please approve my request for the same. A brief summary about me : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sawrub -- Saurabh Sharma Linux user number: 490644 http://sawrub-blog.blogspot.com/ Open yo

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Sawrub
On 10/28/2010 11:31 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 10/28/2010 05:23 PM, Sawrub wrote: >> The installation was done using Fedora 14 Beta, will check the yum >> logs tomorrow for sure and revert back. >> BTW i missed to mention that the 'yum install samba -y' output was >> attached in my f

RE: Does openpgp work with seamonkey and enigma mail

2010-10-28 Thread Jonathan Kamens
You might try installing gnupg instead of or in addition to gnupg2. Jik -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/28/2010 05:23 PM, Sawrub wrote: > The installation was done using Fedora 14 Beta, will check the yum > logs tomorrow for sure and revert back. > BTW i missed to mention that the 'yum install samba -y' output was > attached in my first mail but missed to mention it. So attaching it > again

Does openpgp work with seamonkey and enigma mail

2010-10-28 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
Anything special you need to do? I got the 64 bit version from the download site and it installed ok. Followed the wizard, but sending results in: Send operation aborted. Error - bad passphrase gpg command line and output: /usr/bin/gpg gpg: problem with the agent - disabling agent use gp

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Sawrub
On 10/28/2010 08:41 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 10/28/2010 02:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:08:01PM +0530, Saurabh Sharma wrote: Hello List, i was trying to install Samba under my newly installed F14 using YUM, but the listed packages were having discripancy

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-10-28 at 15:33 +0200, Jan Wildeboer wrote: > All, > > the new Macbook Air and Fedora - has anyone tried it already? From the > specs I see the usual problems: > > - Nvidia GeForce 320M There've been quite a few systems with this chip released by now, so I don't *think* it ought to

F-14 Branched report: 20101028 changes

2010-10-28 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 28 13:15:57 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit) Broken deps for i386 -- qtgpsc-0.2.

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/28/2010 02:56 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:08:01PM +0530, Saurabh Sharma wrote: >> Hello List, >> >> i was trying to install Samba under my newly installed F14 using YUM, but the >> listed packages were having discripancy. The samba package was x86_64 and all >> of th

Re: F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Scott Robbins
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 07:08:01PM +0530, Saurabh Sharma wrote: > Hello List, > > i was trying to install Samba under my newly installed F14 using YUM, but the > listed packages were having discripancy. The samba package was x86_64 and all > of the other dependencies were i686. Accepting to downlo

Re: Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 10/28/2010 01:33 PM, Jan Wildeboer wrote: > All, > > the new Macbook Air and Fedora - has anyone tried it already? From the > specs I see the usual problems: > > - Nvidia GeForce 320M > - Airport Extreme WLAN > - DisplayPort > > I would like to hear if s/o as Fedora up and running on it ... > >

Re: What is this mega-dvd-test?

2010-10-28 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Richard Ryniker wrote: > do you have more information, perhaps a reference to something > that documents the goal of this mega-dvd effort? You might find this thread[1], created two days ago, interesting. [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/095021.html -- test mailing

F14 : Samba Installation Issue

2010-10-28 Thread Saurabh Sharma
Hello List, i was trying to install Samba under my newly installed F14 using YUM, but the listed packages were having discripancy. The samba package was x86_64 and all of the other dependencies were i686. Accepting to download/install the packages , YUM threw error which clearly shows that some of

Fedora 13/14 and new Macbook Air - anyone tried?

2010-10-28 Thread Jan Wildeboer
All, the new Macbook Air and Fedora - has anyone tried it already? From the specs I see the usual problems: - Nvidia GeForce 320M - Airport Extreme WLAN - DisplayPort I would like to hear if s/o as Fedora up and running on it ... Any pointers appreciated Jan -- Jan H Wildeboer

What is this mega-dvd-test?

2010-10-28 Thread Richard Ryniker
Fedora-14-Live-multi.iso is too large (5.2 gigabytes) for a normal DVD with capacity of 4.7 gigabytes or so. Aha! It must be intended for a USB flash drive with capacity of 8GB or greater... [r...@ryniker ryniker]# cmd/livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1024 --home-size-

Re: different output between yum and gpk-update-viewer behind proxy

2010-10-28 Thread Richard Hughes
On 27 October 2010 10:42, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: > Anyway I think output messages should be consistent between the two tools... I think this is a valid bug, in that gnome-packagekit doesn't show anything in the UI if a repo is down. If you open a bug under the component gnome-packagekit, version

Re: [Fedora QA] #146: Proventester membership request

2010-10-28 Thread Fedora QA
#146: Proventester membership request --+- Reporter: bit4man | Owner: mcloaked Type: proventester request | Status: closed Priority: minor| Mile

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-3.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/freetype-2.3.11-6.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ope

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-10-28 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/thunderbird-3.1.5-1.fc13,sunbird-1.0-0.29.b2pre.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-11.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-libwww-perl-5.837-2.fc13