On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 23:30 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Try Nouveau first and if that works for you, stick with that.
> Nouveau provides
> limited 3D support. I think you still need to install
> mesa-dri-drivers-experimental to get 3D for Nouveau.
>
> You said to tr
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:07 AM, the.ma...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Sorry to reply the post again, but I have another question:
> I have tested Ubuntu 10.10 and the Wireless is detected perfectly, Does it
> mean that Fedora does not contain the right drivers for 2.6.34 kernel?
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at
Dear Bruno:
Thank you for your immediate response! I am impressed...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:13 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:09:31 -0700,
> Rob Healey wrote:
> >
> > I would like to know if it is better to use the supplied video drivers by
> fe
> > xorg-x11-drv-
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 23:09:31 -0700,
Rob Healey wrote:
>
> I would like to know if it is better to use the supplied video drivers by fe
> xorg-x11-drv-? or would it be better to use the video driver from NVidia?
> My video card is:
>
> nVidia Corporation NV44 [Quadro NVS 285] (rev a1
>
> W
Greeting All:
First of all, I would like to say thank you for whatever information that
you can give me...
I would like to know if it is better to use the supplied video drivers by fe
xorg-x11-drv-? or would it be better to use the video driver from NVidia?
My video card is:
nVidia Corporation N
Hello,
I wonder what this mega-dvd-test ISO is ? Is it some sort of
all-desktop-environment bundle in one Live DVD?
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/mega-dvd-test/Fedora-14-Live-multi/
If it is something new to F14 release, can we the testers play with it
and fire up issues?
Kind regards,
Sorry to reply the post again, but I have another question:
I have tested Ubuntu 10.10 and the Wireless is detected perfectly, Does it
mean that Fedora does not contain the right drivers for 2.6.34 kernel?
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 11:06 PM, the.ma...@gmail.com
wrote:
> I have to use Fedora 13 only
On Tuesday, October 26, 2010 05:01:47 pm Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is a bug in koji when I click on owner link
> "*.phx2.fedoraproject.org" ie.
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/hostinfo?userID=1263
>
> An error has occurred while processing your request.
> NotFound: cannot find
On 10/26/2010 07:40 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Kamil Paral" wrote:
>
>
>> In this test case
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
>>
>> there's this sentence:
>> # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination
>> list.
>>
>
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:25 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> At the Fedora 14 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Final
> Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on November 2, 2010.
Just wanted to say a huge thanks to the whole list for helping out with
this (see also
http://www.hap
At the Fedora 14 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 14 Final
Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on November 2, 2010.
Thank you to everyone who made this on-time release possible!
A reminder that the Fedora 14 Release Wide Readiness Meeting will take
place on Thursday at 19:00
Hi,
There is a bug in koji when I click on owner link "*.phx2.fedoraproject.org" ie.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/hostinfo?userID=1263
An error has occurred while processing your request.
NotFound: cannot find 'description' while searching for 'host.description'
Traceback (most recent call
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 07:27 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Also the initial hint with British Pound character is invalid in
> Fedora 14. British Pound is not in ASCII and therefore can't be part
> of the password.
yeah, I notice that every time I do this test and keep telling myself to
change it. =
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:27 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 13:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > yeah, that's how I'd do it. But actually, I don't run Rawhide
> > anywhere.
> > I tend to switch to the upcoming release soon after the branch event.
>
> Do you mean switching by rei
Compose started at Tue Oct 26 16:34:49 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
tryton-1.6.1-1.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
Broken deps for i386
--
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 11:50 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> On 10/26/2010 10:01 AM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:37 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >
On 10/26/2010 10:01 AM, James Laska wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:37 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporti
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 23:04 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
>I was doing some critpath checking. I happened to notice that
> at-spi somehow had two versions on Bodhi. The first version,
> at-spi-1.32.0-1.fc14
> (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/at-spi-1.32.0-1.fc14?_csrf_token=6f780264b62148
- "Kamil Paral" wrote:
> Yes, I'm able to login in gdm with non-ascii password. I'll look
> at the bug reports then, and create a new one if necessary.
Here it is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646876
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://ad
- "James Laska" wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 07:27 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > I tried to do this test case:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_login
> >
> > It surprised me that neither firstboot nor system-config-users
> allow
> > to create users with non-ascii char
On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 21:37 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> On 10/25/2010 08:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 20:39 -0400, mwesten wrote:
> >
> Had another thought about this. There's a forum poster reporting similar
> issue:
>
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 12:13 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> > On 10/25/2010 12:57 PM, Qiang Li wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 11:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 02:14 +0800, Qiang Li wrote:
> > >> 1) Direct Rawhide install via standalone Anaconda
> > >> 2) Direct Rawhide
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 7:09 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
> Could I get a few ACKs to the two procedures below...
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora14#Fedora_12_EOL_Warning
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora14#Fedora_12_EOL_Closure
>
> Need
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 07:56 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I tried to do this test case:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_updates
>
> The funny thing is - with F14 Final RC1 there are no updates in the
> 'updates' repository. So I can't really test neither notifications nor
> th
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 07:27 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> I tried to do this test case:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_login
>
> It surprised me that neither firstboot nor system-config-users allow
> to create users with non-ascii characters in either username or password.
>
>
I tried to do this test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_updates
The funny thing is - with F14 Final RC1 there are no updates in the
'updates' repository. So I can't really test neither notifications nor
the actual upgrade process. Neither can I downgrade some package.
I
- "Kamil Paral" wrote:
> In this test case
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_save_traceback_to_remote_system
>
> there's this sentence:
> # On the Save dialog, choose Remote server from the destination
> list.
>
> However, after hitting Save button, I have following opt
I tried to do this test case:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_desktop_login
It surprised me that neither firstboot nor system-config-users allow
to create users with non-ascii characters in either username or password.
I would suspect that unix username must be ascii-only, but I would
Greetings,
As you can see in the bug list summarized below, Test results of
F-14-Final-RC1 are positive so far, no blocker bugs were found when
executing the tests. Many thanks for the hard working of developers,
rel-engineers, and testers to keep improve the quality of Fedora.
=
#146: Proventester membership request
--+-
Reporter: bit4man | Owner: mcloaked
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Mile
30 matches
Mail list logo
