The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-0.96.3-1200.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.13-1.fc12.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat
john wendel wrote:
> I just used preupgrade to convert F13 KDE box to F14 beta. I'm using the
> RADEON video driver with an older ATI video card. Under F13, I had nice,
> transparent Konsole windows, but F14 the Konsole configuration says that
> transparency is "not supported". Any clues will be a
I just used preupgrade to convert F13 KDE box to F14 beta. I'm using the
RADEON video driver with an older ATI video card. Under F13, I had nice,
transparent Konsole windows, but F14 the Konsole configuration says that
transparency is "not supported". Any clues will be appreciated.
Regards,
Jo
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 14:38:43 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote:
AW> It's possible testers aren't aware that they can test this simply by
AW> running evince or kpdf (or whatever the KDE PDF viewer is). Proven
Its okular (the KDE pdf viewer).
AW> testers, consider yourselves informed :) If you can run e
On 10/20/2010 02:12 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:29 -0400, TK009 wrote:
>>> I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the
>>> group lead suggested this to one of his users -
>>>
>>> "Fusion 1
Compose started at Wed Oct 20 13:15:08 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
fldigi-3.20.28-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libxmlrpc++.so.7()(64bit)
fldigi-3.20.28-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libxmlrpc_server++.so.7()(64bit)
fldigi-3.
2010/10/20 Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
>
> Just out of curiosity if you set /mnt/sysimage as installroot for yum what
> is the mount necessary for?
>
> Regards,
> Dennis
>
> it's required for yum to work. i don't remember the error, but you can try
and see for yourself. just boot any recent fedora re
Valent Turkovic wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:29 -0400, TK009 wrote:
>>
>>> I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the
>>> group lead suggested this to one of his users -
>>>
>>> "Fusion 14 betais ba
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 11:29 -0400, TK009 wrote:
>> I got an email this morning from the Fusion Linux group. In it, the
>> group lead suggested this to one of his users -
>>
>> "Fusion 14 betais based on Fedora 14 which isn't released yet s
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:11:20 +
Rawhide Report wrote:
> Compose started at Wed Oct 20 08:15:04 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> dreampie-python3-1.1-5.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:3.1
>
>
> Broken deps for i386
> -
Compose started at Wed Oct 20 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
R-RScaLAPACK-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libmpi.so.0()(64bit)
R-RScaLAPACK-0.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64 requires libopen-rte.so.0()(64bit)
R-RScaLAPACK-
On 10/20/2010 11:06 AM, cornel panceac wrote:
> 2010/10/20 cornel panceac mailto:cpanc...@gmail.com>>
>
> how can i install a newer kernel (or whatever is faulting here) if the
> system no longer boots?
> i get this error everytime i attempt boot:
>
> ...
> dracut: Switching roo
2010/10/20 cornel panceac
> how can i install a newer kernel (or whatever is faulting here) if the
> system no longer boots?
> i get this error everytime i attempt boot:
>
> ...
> dracut: Switching root
> init[1]: segfault at 464dfc . in ld-2.12.90.so[444000+2]
> .
>
> i'm not reachin
Greetings testers,
Fedora 14 Final TC validation test event has come to an end, this time
we have more testers participating in the events and therefore more bugs
were identified including blocker bugs, so many thanks for the ones who
leaded/attended/payed attention on the test event. As before, t
how can i install a newer kernel (or whatever is faulting here) if the
system no longer boots?
i get this error everytime i attempt boot:
...
dracut: Switching root
init[1]: segfault at 464dfc . in ld-2.12.90.so[444000+2]
.
i'm not reaching even runlevel 1.
--
When one door is close
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:00:23 +0300, cornel wrote:
> > well, yes, indeed abrt asks the user to choose where to report, so, there
> are two things that can happen here: user chooses the right place and the
> report is successful,
... and still it might be the wrong bug tracker. (<-- the plugins/mod
16 matches
Mail list logo