On 10/19/2010 12:49 PM, cornel panceac wrote:
> wouldn't it be nice to have a "You can safely remove device" message
> displayed for a few seconds every time after you click the option on
> the usb drive's right-click menu?
> also a message displayed al the time during the sync would complete
> t
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 21:39 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 16:15:46 -0700,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >
> > Actually there are switches that need to be thrown, to point the repos
> > to the right place. Also we need to make sure tha
wouldn't it be nice to have a "You can safely remove device" message
displayed for a few seconds every time after you click the option on the usb
drive's right-click menu?
also a message displayed al the time during the sync would complete the user
xperience. imho, of course.
--
When one door is
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 16:15:46 -0700,
Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> Actually there are switches that need to be thrown, to point the repos
> to the right place. Also we need to make sure that any modifications
> made to the kickstart scripts used to produce th
Hi, everyone. Following up on my drafts from last month - see the
threads
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-September/143343.html and
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/2010-October/094469.html - I've
now pushed the Wiki modifications to cover the new process for tra
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 05:17:05PM +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> Then I used the script from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcl
> i.e. the file "upd_bootiso" referenced from that web page, and
> executed it with the new anaconda rpm downloaded from a mirror for f14
> updates-testing so that a ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2010 04:36 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> * The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> the release repository in packaged form (both fedora-release-notes and
> generic-release-notes)
Works for me.
> * A spin-kicks
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 16:15 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I don't think this *in itself* is a criteria issue, in that whatever the
> > final spin-kickstarts package turns out to be is fairly arbitrary,
> > right? There aren't specific requirements for the package itself as
> > there are for the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2010 04:07 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 15:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/18/2010 09:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> Proposed Final release criterion:
>>>
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 15:36 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/18/2010 09:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Proposed Final release criterion:
> >
> > The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> > the release reposit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2010 09:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Proposed Final release criterion:
>
> The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> the release repository in packaged form
We need the same for final versions of artwork ( m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/18/2010 09:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Proposed Final release criterion:
>
> The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> the release repository in packaged form
WORKSFORME.
- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2010 01:01 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> Just did a "yum install revisor" as root and going forward.
We don't use Revisor as part of the Fedora creation and distribution
infrastructure. I would not be able to help you with it.
- --
Jesse K
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/17/2010 12:37 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>
>> I've been playing around with revisor/pungi/etc...
>>
>> Everything works up to the point of starting to write the iso file, when
>> it err
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 10:55 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> - "Christopher Beland" wrote:
>
> > Bug 626594 is requesting that numlock functionality be added to
> > Fedora's
> > "QA checklist". Is this something that's appropriate to add to
> > release
> > criteria or a test matrix or something?
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 20:09 +0200, Stefan Grosse wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:54:16 + upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
>
> UO> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/poppler-0.12.4-6.fc13
>
> This is a security relevant update. It got not no 'proventester'
> reviews since more than 7
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.13-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocsinventory-agent-1.1.2.1-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-libwww-perl-5.837-2.fc14
https://admin.fedo
Filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=644046 to find out quickly
whether this is a bug in xz or not, since the new version hasn't been pushed to
F14 and below yet.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/te
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:31 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>>> I've beaten my head against revisor for two days now, actually
>>> patching python code
>>> and examinig debug output. I'm retired from programming on disability
>>> for a g
A new version of xz (xz-4.999.9-0.3.beta.212.gacbc.fc15) was built and pushed to
Rawhide on October 16. Today, I saw several "md5sum mismatch of result" errors
in rebuilding drpms. In each case, the drpm rebuild failed if and only if the
corresponding new rpm was built before the xz update. (For ex
> On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:31 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>> I've beaten my head against revisor for two days now, actually
>> patching python code
>> and examinig debug output. I'm retired from programming on disability
>> for a good
>> reason, my head hurts (bad) and I'm depressed and confus
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 09:58 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Proposed Final release criterion:
>
> The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
> the release repository in packaged form
Seems pretty straightforward, I have no objections.
Thanks for proposing,
James
sig
#fedora-bugzappers: F-14-Final Blocker Review Meeting -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F14Blocker&hide_resolved=1
=
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 15:09 -0500, Robert G. (Doc) Savage wrote:
> In /usr/share/hwdata/pci.ids I found:
>
> 4c45 Rage Mobility M3 AGP
> 4c46 Rage Mobility M3 AGP 2x
> 1002 0155 IBM Thinkpad A22p
> 1014 0155 IBM Thinkpad A22p
> 1
Proposed Final release criterion:
The final release notes from the Documentation team must be present in
the release repository in packaged form
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
test mailing
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 12:31 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> I've beaten my head against revisor for two days now, actually
> patching python code
> and examinig debug output. I'm retired from programming on disability
> for a good
> reason, my head hurts (bad) and I'm depressed and confused.
>
>
Yep, I had pretty much the same experience some time back and gave up too. I
consider Revisor broken now until someone tells me otherwise... :(
Fab
# Fabian A. Scherschel
# Host & Producer, Sixgun Productions
# Member, Fedora Design Team
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote
I've beaten my head against revisor for two days now, actually patching
python code
and examinig debug output. I'm retired from programming on disability for a
good
reason, my head hurts (bad) and I'm depressed and confused.
the problem I'm having is from anaconda changes that the packaged reviso
Compose started at Mon Oct 18 13:15:05 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
spacewalk-certs-tools-1
- "Christopher Beland" wrote:
> Bug 626594 is requesting that numlock functionality be added to
> Fedora's
> "QA checklist". Is this something that's appropriate to add to
> release
> criteria or a test matrix or something? Or should we just leave it
> to
> Bugzilla (currently bugs 115909 a
Bug 626594 is requesting that numlock functionality be added to Fedora's
"QA checklist". Is this something that's appropriate to add to release
criteria or a test matrix or something? Or should we just leave it to
Bugzilla (currently bugs 115909 and 528337 are still outstanding on this
issue).
-
#135: Proposed Test Day - TOPIC How about a consideration of the dual boot
issues from Fedora 13?
---+
Reporter: dramsey | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major |
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-10-18
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings gang,
It's that time again! As we approach the release date, there typically
aren't a lot of new initiatives to discuss. Instead, the top
Compose started at Mon Oct 18 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
0:1.3.0
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 9:01 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> I'd like to see your setup instructions again.
>
Here is a copy of a set of notes I created some a months ago - you may
well need to adapt for your own use:
"These notes relate only to using mock/pungi for Fedora install iso
builds, no
35 matches
Mail list logo
