Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-10-10

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Still broken compared with F-14 Branched: 4 builds Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched:

[Fedora QA] #140: Proventester Mentor Request

#140: Proventester Mentor Request -+-- Reporter: mrjfont | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Compo

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bind-dyndb-ldap-0.1.0-0.14.b.fc14,dnsperf-1.0.1.0-21.fc14,bind-9.7.2-2.P2.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ardour-2.8.11-5.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-libww

Re: fake Final TC1?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/9/10 9:13 AM, Andre Robatino wrote: > There's a build labeled TC1 at > > http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/ > > I know this probably isn't the real TC1, since that's scheduled for October > 12, > but what happens when

Re: certain php-pear and php-channel-doctrine installs or updates run php forever

On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:12:01 +0200 Remi Collet wrote: > At least this should be reported against "graphviz" (graphviz-php) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641639 > > You should also try to disable as much as possible extension (put in > comment the "extension" directive in /etc/php

Re: fake Final TC1?

On 10/10/10 03:13, Andre Robatino wrote: > There's a build labeled TC1 at > > http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/ > > I know this probably isn't the real TC1, since that's scheduled for October > 12, > but what happens when the real one arrives? Will it replace this one in

fake Final TC1?

There's a build labeled TC1 at http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/ I know this probably isn't the real TC1, since that's scheduled for October 12, but what happens when the real one arrives? Will it replace this one in the exact same directory? Will this one remain and the

Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-10-09

Still broken compared with F-14 Branched: 4 builds Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched: almanah gnome-pilot-conduits gpx-viewer intellij-idea perl-Test-Simple php-pecl-imagick spacewalk-certs-tools valide Additional broken packages with Test Updates

F-14 Branched report: 20101009 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 9 13:15:27 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 gnome-pi

Re: test Digest, Vol 80, Issue 19

Kindly do NOT reply to digests. Especially, don't reply to digests and quote the *entire* digest all over again. Your message of course will now be included in the next digest, and suppose someone replies to that. See where I'm going with this? But even if you don't quote the entire contents, jus

rawhide report: 20101009 changes

Compose started at Sat Oct 9 08:15:22 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 bognor-regis-0.6.8-1.fc15.i686 requires libtracker-client-0.8.so.0 bognor-regis-0

Re: Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-10-09

> package: rubygem-cucumber-0.9.0-4.fc14.noarch from > fedora-updates-testing-14-i386 > unresolved deps: > rubygem(gherkin) >= 0:2.2.4 > > package: rubygem-cucumber-0.9.0-4.fc14.noarch from > fedora-updates-testing-14-x86_64 > unresolved deps: > rubygem(gherkin) >= 0:2.2.4 > This

Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-10-09

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Still broken compared with F-14 Branched: 4 builds Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched: