2010/10/2 Robert G. (Doc) Savage:
> Thanks. That's good news. Two weeks ago I tried its predecessor,
> (flashplayer_square_p1_64bit_linux_091510.tar.gz) and it was an utter
> failure.
I have been using RPMS built upon
http://rpm.greysector.net/specs/flash-plugin.spec released by Dominik
Mierzejew
On 02/10/10 13:47, John Watzke wrote:
> I believe it meets the installer failing criteria with the current
> F14-Beta release.
>
> Sadly due to my timezone I am never awake for the meetings to bring
> it up.
>
>
> You don't have to be present to suggest a bug. If you edit the b
>
> I believe it meets the installer failing criteria with the current
> F14-Beta release.
>
> Sadly due to my timezone I am never awake for the meetings to bring it up.
>
You don't have to be present to suggest a bug. If you edit the bug and
set F14Blocker in the "Blocks" field, it will be di
I would like to propose this as a F14-Blocker as well:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637495
I believe it meets the installer failing criteria with the current
F14-Beta release.
Sadly due to my timezone I am never awake for the meetings to bring it up.
--
Steven Haigh
Email: net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/01/2010 02:40 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Up-to-date Fedora 14 Beta (Oct 1st):
>
> "init 1" (or also "init 3") run from within a GNOME session here
> doesn't terminate X.
>
> Is it just my installation or reproducible?
>
> $ rpm -qf /sbin/in
>
> > are you sure you didn't also get a glib2 update in the mean time? There
> > has been one.
>
> yum history list glib2
>
> will tell you which transactions last acted on glib2
>
>
This is what I get on yum history of glib2 and totem:
[r...@localhost ~]# yum history list glib2
Loaded plugins: a
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 15:12 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Directions:
>
> 1) tar -xzvpf flashplayer_square_p2_64bit_linux_092710.tar.gz
>
> 2) mv libflashplayer.so $HOME/.mozilla/plugins
Rob,
I had problems with this release as well until I found and renamed
several nswrapper_XX_XX.libflashplayer.
==
#fedora-bugzappers: F14 Blocker Bug Review
==
Meeting started by jlaska at 16:00:07 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-10-01/f-14-blocker-review.2010-10-01-1
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-0.96.3-1400.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_mount-2.5-1.fc14,libHX-3.6-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ardour-2.8.11-5.fc14
https://admin.fedorapro
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 15:12 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> Hello All! I know that the question of getting a 64bit version of
> Adobe Flash Player has gone around and around for a long time! I am
> not here to complain, but to bear great news!
>
> Directly from an email pal of mine,
Greetings:
Hello All! I know that the question of getting a 64bit version of Adobe
Flash Player has gone around and around for a long time! I am not here to
complain, but to bear great news!
Directly from an email pal of mine,
Hi Rob
A preview version of Flash Player 64bit has recently been
I am positive that glib2 didn't fix this. I had just sat down to do my
testing for the radeon graphics test day and when I got to the second test
where you had to use totem, I couldn't get anywhere because totem kept
crashing. I was going to file a bug and I checked bodhi to see if anyone
else
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:15 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> > Actually I misspoke it's gtk2 that was changed not glib2. So I
> > wonder if this is glib2 related at all since these packages fix the
> > problem.
>
> are you sure you didn't
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:15 -0500, John Watzke wrote:
> Actually I misspoke it's gtk2 that was changed not glib2. So I
> wonder if this is glib2 related at all since these packages fix the
> problem.
are you sure you didn't also get a glib2 update in the mean time? There
has been one.
--
Ada
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 16:16 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:10:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 15:58 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >
> > > > I like to see that always be a requirement for the stable,
> > > > stable+updates
> > > > and rawh
I have an old Amilo D68 laptop that cannot boot from a usbkey and I
wanted to run a test install of the beta for f14 but without having to
burn a physical DVD. so I started poking around for a way to do it
from a usbkey.
Since the BIOS does not allow booting from a usb device I found that
ther
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:10:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 15:58 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> > > I like to see that always be a requirement for the stable, stable+updates
> > > and rawhide (assuming the rawhide-pending tag becomes a reality).
> >
> > I would li
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 15:58 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > I like to see that always be a requirement for the stable, stable+updates
> > and rawhide (assuming the rawhide-pending tag becomes a reality).
>
> I would like to see this eventually too. However, we don't have a
> capability to stop
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 02:34:35PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:31:47 -0700,
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > During today's blocker review meeting, releng have come out all
> > enthusiastic about having no broken dependencies or unintentional
> > conflicts in any packa
Am Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:40:13 +0200
schrieb Michael Schwendt :
> Up-to-date Fedora 14 Beta (Oct 1st):
>
> "init 1" (or also "init 3") run from within a GNOME session here
> doesn't terminate X.
>
> Is it just my installation or reproducible?
>
> $ rpm -qf /sbin/init
> upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-9.fc1
Up-to-date Fedora 14 Beta (Oct 1st):
"init 1" (or also "init 3") run from within a GNOME session here
doesn't terminate X.
Is it just my installation or reproducible?
$ rpm -qf /sbin/init
upstart-sysvinit-0.6.5-9.fc14.i686
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:31:47 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> During today's blocker review meeting, releng have come out all
> enthusiastic about having no broken dependencies or unintentional
> conflicts in any package (not just packages present on the media) at
> final release time. So, he
During today's blocker review meeting, releng have come out all
enthusiastic about having no broken dependencies or unintentional
conflicts in any package (not just packages present on the media) at
final release time. So, here is a proposed release criterion to cover
this. Proposed for Final stage
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 09:38 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Good morning:
>
> Ever since yesterday's update for rawhide, it messed up something in gtk...
>
> I was hoping that today's updates(9/30/2010) would fix the problem, but it
> still persists...
>
> It is blocking/ STOPPING me from using my ge
Hi all,
I'm not 100% sure on how to get more details on this to be more helpful.
I noticed recently that the ability to connect to SSH (SFTP) has broken
from within nautilus. I assume that this uses gvfs to achieve.
Whenever I try to connect to my SFTP bookmark (or any SFTP connection),
I get
389-ds-base-1.2.6.1-2 is now in Testing. This release fixes the
crashing problems seen with Windows Sync, and fixes some other crashing
problems usually seen with deletion operations. Please help us test.
The sooner we can get this release tested, the sooner we can push it to
Stable and make it g
Compose started at Fri Oct 1 13:15:21 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
evolutio
On 10/01/2010 09:17 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>>>
>>>Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
>>> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
On 10/01/2010 10:54 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from requiring texlive [1]?
>> It seems bizarre that a stats package has a deep coupling with a
>> typesetting language .. ;-)
>>
>>is there any wa
On 10/01/2010 06:40 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> dikshie wrote:
>>
>>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
>>
>> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of
>> those just done recently was texlive.
>>
>> -- Rex
>>
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 07:03 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi
>
> Question: are these error relevant critical when updating F14 with yum?
>
> /usr/share/mime/packages/openoffice.org.xml:749: parser error : error
> parsing attribute name
> 0bq Presentation
> ^
#136: joining proventester: michich
--+-
Reporter: michich | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Compose started at Fri Oct 1 08:15:23 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
calibre-
On 10/01/2010 07:04 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> dikshie wrote:
>
>> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
>
> Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of
> those just done recently was texlive.
>
> -- Rex
>
>
Is there any way to decouple the bulk of R from
#136: joining proventester: michich
-+--
Reporter: michich | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Com
dikshie wrote:
> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in rawhide?
Yes, a new poppler landed recently, and rebuilds are proceeding. One of
those just done recently was texlive.
-- Rex
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:35:45 +0900, dikshie wrote:
> Hi,
> anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide?
There is no "fedora 14 rawhide". Rawhide currently is Fedora 15
development. The broken dependencies in there are reported with the daily
"rawhide report".
--
test mailing list
tes
Hi,
anyone aware about libpoppler issue in fedora 14 rawhide?
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package R.x86_64 0:2.11.1-4.fc14 set to be installed
--> Processing Dependency: R-devel = 2.11.1-4.fc14 for package:
R-2.11.1-4.fc14.x86_64
--> Running transaction check
---> Pac
38 matches
Mail list logo
