It's been creeping up, and now it's time: the world-famous Graphics Test
Week begins tomorrow (2010-09-28), with the Nouveau Test Day [1]. As
always, the event runs all day in #fedora-test-day on Freenode IRC. To
complete Graphics Test Week, the Radeon Test Day [2] takes place the
following day, We
Adam,
On 2010-09-28 08:23, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:32 +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
>> Philip Rhoades wrote:
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2010-09-22 17:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:29 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> People,
>
>
> I find i
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-16.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.12-10.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openldap-2.4.19-6.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/upda
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:00:46 +0100, Peter wrote:
> I'm not sure this last report is really correct because I got a whole
> lot of errors against evolution soname bumps but the version that its
> complaining about is in updates-testing.
I'm sure the report is correct unless you prove otherwise.
T
On 09/27/2010 10:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
>> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>>
>> ==
>> The results in this summary consider Test Update
#134: Clarify writing ISO to USB tests
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:22 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > In practice this is a formalization of existing procedure - until F14
> > Beta, QA and releng did much the same process but entirely informally,
> > we just kept lists of bugs we'd take fixes for either in our heads or in
> > the RC creatio
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 09:32 +0100, Ron Leach wrote:
> Philip Rhoades wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> >
> > On 2010-09-22 17:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:29 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> >>> People,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I find it boots OK with qemu and from a USB stick and, in fac
#134: Clarify writing ISO to USB tests
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
#134: Clarify writing ISO to USB tests
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
#109: Proventester Mentor Request (fcami)
--+-
Reporter: fcami| Owner: rhe
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Mile
W dniu 27 września 2010 23:13 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> 2010/9/27 Rodd Clarkson :
>> I've been having troubles getting 2.6.34.x kernels on f13 and 2.6.35.x
>> kernels on f14 to resume from suspend.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628897
>>
>> To try and resolve this
2010/9/27 Rodd Clarkson :
> I've been having troubles getting 2.6.34.x kernels on f13 and 2.6.35.x
> kernels on f14 to resume from suspend.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628897
>
> To try and resolve this I've been trying out other recent distros to see if
> they have similar kern
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
>> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>>
>> ==
>> The results in this summary consider T
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said:
> The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
>
> ==
> The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
> ==
#133: Proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: carlg| Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: minor| Milestone:
I've been having troubles getting 2.6.34.x kernels on f13 and 2.6.35.x
kernels on f14 to resume from suspend.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=628897
To try and resolve this I've been trying out other recent distros to see if
they have similar kernels and whether I have the same proble
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
Still broken compared with F-14 Branched:
12 builds
Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched:
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_mount-2.5-1.fc14,libHX-3.6-1.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghostscript-8.71-16.fc14
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-libwww-perl-5.837-1.fc14
https://admin
#130: proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: norbot | Owner: jlaska
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
#130: proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: norbot | Owner: jlaska
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Mileston
Compose started at Mon Sep 27 13:15:27 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit)
#134: Clarify writing ISO to USB tests
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Test Review | Version:
#133: Proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: carlg| Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: minor| Mileston
#130: proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: norbot | Owner: jlaska
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Mileston
Start End Name
Tue 28-Sep Tue 28-Sep Beta Release Public Availability
Tue 28-Sep Tue 28-Sep Prepare GA Release Notes
Tue 28-Sep Mon 18-Oct Beta Testing
Fri 01-Oct Fri 01-Oct Final Blocker Meeting (f14blocker) #2
Thu 07-Oct Wed 13-Oct Pre-RC Acceptance Test Plan
Fri 08-Oct F
FYI I had not noticed any problems with dual boot here. I had to
reinstall Vista on my laptop, then I installed F14 from netinstall
Beta RC1 iso - works without problems.
Regards,
Michal
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-09-27
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers,
Many thanks to those who contributed test feedback for the beta (wiki
results, bugzilla's and mailing list feedback). Given the l
#135: Proposed Test Day - TOPIC How about a consideration of the dual boot
issues from Fedora 13?
---+
Reporter: dramsey | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major |
Compose started at Mon Sep 27 08:15:36 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.i686 requires libgs.so.8
ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-14.fc15.x86_64 requires libgs.so.8()(64bit)
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64
Ron,
On 2010-09-27 18:32, Ron Leach wrote:
> Philip Rhoades wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>>
>> On 2010-09-22 17:58, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 14:29 +1000, Philip Rhoades wrote:
People,
I find it boots OK with qemu and from a USB stick and, in fact,
seems to
>
On 27/09/10 19:29, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/27/2010 10:41 AM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> On 27/09/10 15:10, Joachim Backes wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2010 07:06 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm wondering if someone is able to reproduce this. I am starting to
think that it is an is
#135: Proposed Test Day - TOPIC How about a consideration of the dual boot
issues from Fedora 13?
---+
Reporter: dramsey| Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major |
On 27/09/10 15:10, Joachim Backes wrote:
> On 09/26/2010 07:06 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I'm wondering if someone is able to reproduce this. I am starting to
>> think that it is an issue with evince - not cups or ghostscript as I
>> originally suspected.
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redha
34 matches
Mail list logo
