On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 00:07 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
> Check kernel logs and X logs after rebooting, see if there's
> crash
> notifications in either. (You'll want to look
> at /var/log/Xorg
2010/9/12 Lawrence E Graves
> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 06:42 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:25:17AM -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> > > I am not able to print to my Brothers MFC-495CW. It installs but will
> > > not print. However, the scanner works.
> > >
> > >
> > I
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
> I haven't seen the X logs, but it sounds like different bugs to me...
I attached the X.log for my one bare metal box that goes into text mode.
Unfortunately, any machine that behaves exactly the same as KVM will be
impossible to get logs from (since it'll be
Delete that message!!!
I forgot the command, systemctl ;-)
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
When I run:
sudo status rpcbind.service
or
sudo status acpid.service
I always get an error message:
status: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
I have:
initscripts-9.20-1.fc14.x86_64
sysvinit-tools-2.87-5.dsf.fc14.x86_64
systemd
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 06:42 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:25:17AM -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> > I am not able to print to my Brothers MFC-495CW. It installs but will
> > not print. However, the scanner works.
> >
> >
> Is that a PCL? I see that Brothers does pr
On 09/13/2010 05:37 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 21:09 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> You are correct on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423
>>
>>
>>
>> I feel this should be listed as F1
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:19 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:15 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:55:19 + (UTC)
> > > Andre Robatino wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've reported
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla
Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
Also, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073 is for bare metal as
well.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
Adam Williamson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:15 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:55:19 + (UTC)
> > Andre Robatino wrote:
> >
> > > I've reported
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805
> >
> > Could be the same as this one:
>
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Check kernel logs and X logs after rebooting, see if there's crash
> notifications in either. (You'll want to look at /var/log/Xorg.0.log.old
> rather than Xorg.0.log). What's the gfx card?
>
Thanks, I'll check that out, though I doubt t
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been encountering a strange issue I have no idea how to handle --
> my laptop hard freezes about an half an hour after boot, irrespective of
> what am I doing (first I was doing something in midori, second I was
> listenin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/12/2010 03:36 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> Anyone one having similar issues? Any idea how to debug this? How to
> produce some usable info in order to fill a bug?
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
There is some information about troubleshooting this type
Hi all,
I've been encountering a strange issue I have no idea how to handle --
my laptop hard freezes about an half an hour after boot, irrespective of
what am I doing (first I was doing something in midori, second I was
listening to some song in rhythmbox, third I wasn't even present).
Screen fre
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 21:09 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> You are correct on this.
>
>
>
> I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423
>
>
>
> I feel this should be listed as F14Blocker – as in its current state,
> ghostscript i
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:15 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:55:19 + (UTC)
> Andre Robatino wrote:
>
> > I've reported
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805
>
> Could be the same as this one:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073
>
>
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 22:24 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business
> consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.)
>
> I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current
> quality level and I find it har
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 07:44 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 09/12/2010 01:07 AM, David wrote:
> > Perhaps you are correct here. It bothers me when I see the Fedora devs
> > work so hard to produce a product and then someone steps in and attacks
> > it.
> Pointing out flaws in a product is not "
On 09/13/2010 02:27 AM, Tom London wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've just subscribed to the list so I apologise if this has already been
>> looked at in previous months (I didn't find anything on the archives).
>>
>> I've been having issues with th
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've just subscribed to the list so I apologise if this has already been
> looked at in previous months (I didn't find anything on the archives).
>
> I've been having issues with the xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.12.0-4.fc14.i686
> driver o
On 09/13/2010 01:39 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:09:44PM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
>>
>> I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423
>
> If I understand correctly a comment 3 there you ended up with
> Fon
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 09:09:44PM +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
> I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423
If I understand correctly a comment 3 there you ended up with
Fontmap.Fontmap.local (probably empty). I wonder if providin
Compose started at Sun Sep 12 13:15:23 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 20:06:41 +0530,
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > livecd-tools-034-1.fc15
> > ---
> > * Sat Sep 11 2010 Bruno Wolff III - 034-1
> >
>
> [snipped]
>
> Thanks for working on this. I was getting worried that this tool wouldn't
> be taken care of after Jeremy
> livecd-tools-034-1.fc15
> ---
> * Sat Sep 11 2010 Bruno Wolff III - 034-1
>
[snipped]
Thanks for working on this. I was getting worried that this tool wouldn't
be taken care of after Jeremy Katz left Red Hat. Having regular updates is
pretty important for this one.
Rahu
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:24:09 -0400, Jonathan wrote:
> I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current quality
> level and I find it hard to believe it's going to be ready for a good
> beta at the end of September.
> And this is after only a few hours of using F14.
It's completely
Compose started at Sun Sep 12 08:15:38 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-
On 09/12/2010 01:07 AM, David wrote:
> Perhaps you are correct here. It bothers me when I see the Fedora devs
> work so hard to produce a product and then someone steps in and attacks
> it.
*Pointing out flaws in a product is not "attacking" it.*
I may not be a "Fedora dev" /per se/, but I have m
On 09/12/2010 12:46 AM, David wrote:
> I value your opinion Bruno so.. if you say so. But I am still not
> impressed with that 'my dogs bigger than your dog' routine that he used
> in the whine.
Um, dude, /you /started the "my dog's bigger than your dog" with your
disparaging comment about "others
On 09/12/2010 12:09 AM, David wrote:
> A personal email that complains of my 'attack'? :-)
A personal email to give you the opportunity to realize you were wrong
and change course while saving face. An opportunity on which, alas, you
failed to capitalize.
> You, personally,
> perhaps did not dese
You are correct on this.
I found a bug lodged on it already for ghostscript:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630423
I feel this should be listed as F14Blocker as in its current state,
ghostscript is completely broken
--
Steven Haigh
Email: net...@crc.id.au
Web: htt
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 04:25:17AM -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote:
> I am not able to print to my Brothers MFC-495CW. It installs but will
> not print. However, the scanner works.
>
>
Is that a PCL? I see that Brothers does provide Linux drivers for that
printer.
http://welcome.solutions.b
I am not able to print to my Brothers MFC-495CW. It installs but will
not print. However, the scanner works.
On Sun, 2010-09-12 at 14:43 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote:
> I've been trying to get my F14 netbook to print to a FujiXerox
> DocuCentre-II C3000.
>
> I'm pretty sure under F13 I set this
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:07 AM, David wrote:
> On 9/12/2010 12:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 00:46:49 -0400,
>> David wrote:
>>>
>>> His comment about the number of my bug reports only indicates that I
>>> have few problems and most of them are common and reported by
On 09/12/2010 05:00 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Actually, I suspect it's a result of this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630490
>
> until the fix for that gets pushed, in F14, if you use systemd and
> 'disable' NetworkManager.service, NM will still get started up by bus
> ac
35 matches
Mail list logo
