Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Petrus de Calguarium
Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current quality > level and I find it hard to believe it's going to be ready for a good > beta at the end of September. I upgraded both my desktop and laptop computers to F14 about 10-14 days ago, sometime around th

Re: Printing to PCL printers.

2010-09-11 Thread Maximi89
2010/9/12 Steven Haigh > I've been trying to get my F14 netbook to print to a FujiXerox > DocuCentre-II C3000. > > I'm pretty sure under F13 I set this printer up as a generic PCL6 or > similar using pxlcolor - but it 'just worked'. I cannot however get this > working under F14 at all. > > The on

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread David
On 9/12/2010 12:51 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 00:46:49 -0400, > David wrote: >> >> His comment about the number of my bug reports only indicates that I >> have few problems and most of them are common and reported by others >> before me. >> >> I value your opinion Bruno

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Christopher Beland
I'm actually using F14 Alpha as my primary desktop, and other than Evolution being very crashy, I've encountered few problems that weren't in previous final releases. There are definitely some UI items that have improved on previous releases, so I am pretty happy. Whether it's working well in you

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 00:46:49 -0400, David wrote: > > His comment about the number of my bug reports only indicates that I > have few problems and most of them are common and reported by others > before me. > > I value your opinion Bruno so.. if you say so. But I am still not > impressed wi

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread David
On 9/12/2010 12:34 AM, Phil Savoie wrote: > On 12/09/10 12:09 AM, David wrote: >> On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: >>> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote: Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again and then come back in, say, another month or two,

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread David
On 9/12/2010 12:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 23:27:41 -0400, > David wrote: >> >> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again >> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these >> problems will be all be worked out by ot

Printing to PCL printers.

2010-09-11 Thread Steven Haigh
I've been trying to get my F14 netbook to print to a FujiXerox DocuCentre-II C3000. I'm pretty sure under F13 I set this printer up as a generic PCL6 or similar using pxlcolor - but it 'just worked'. I cannot however get this working under F14 at all. The only clue I can find in the cups error

redraw issues with intel x driver.

2010-09-11 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi all, I've just subscribed to the list so I apologise if this has already been looked at in previous months (I didn't find anything on the archives). I've been having issues with the xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.12.0-4.fc14.i686 driver on my netbook. I located a bug and added what info I could to thi

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Phil Savoie
On 12/09/10 12:09 AM, David wrote: > On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: >> On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote: >>> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again >>> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these >>> problems will be all b

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 23:27:41 -0400, David wrote: > > Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again > and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these > problems will be all be worked out by others that actually do the > testing and everything wi

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread David
On 9/11/2010 11:44 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > On 09/11/2010 11:27 PM, David wrote: >> Wow! That is a large number of problems. Perhaps if you go away again >> and then come back in, say, another month or two, perhaps three, these >> problems will be all be worked out by others that actually do t

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread David
On 9/11/2010 10:24 PM, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business > consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) > > I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current quality > level and I find it hard to believ

Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-11 Thread Jonathan Kamens
(I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current quality level and I find it hard to believe it's going to be ready for a good beta at the end of S

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-11 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:32:40 +0200 Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 09/09/2010 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:45:59 +0200 > > Michał Piotrowski wrote: > > > >> 2010/9/9 Harald Hoyer: > >>> On 09/07/2010 02:41 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I want to compare

Re: Please test basic video driver in 14 Beta TC1

2010-09-11 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:55:19 + (UTC) Andre Robatino wrote: > I've reported > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805 Could be the same as this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073 I found I could Ctrl-Atl-F2 (or one of those function keys anyway) and find th

Please test basic video driver in 14 Beta TC1

2010-09-11 Thread Andre Robatino
I've reported https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805 for 14 Beta TC1. After booting using basic video driver, stage2 sometimes doesn't come up. In KVM, there is just a black screen. I tested in 3 different bare metal boxes, getting 3 different results - black screen, normal, text mode

Re: Firstboot fails to run after Beta TC1 CD installation - test case needed?

2010-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 13:30 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > I did an install from CDs and it ran well all the way to the > installation of grub and rebooting. > Firstboot, howeve, failed to run and make the user entries. > > Bugzilla: 632880 dupe of 628241. the firstboot in tc1 is known to be bu

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs. / Every OS sucks!

2010-09-11 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 23:55 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 16:23:12 -0500, > John Morris wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 00:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep

Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2010-09-12

2010-09-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Broken packages in F-12 + Updates (src.rpm names): ibus-fbterm joni mrpt msp430-libc

Broken dependencies with Fedora 13 + updates-testing - 2010-09-12

2010-09-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Broken packages in F-13 + Updates (src.rpm names): almanah gcc (

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread John Watzke
> > > Anybody sees this too? > > Yes, I'm getting it as well. I pulled this from koji to test it out since it was supposed to fix a bug in the user switch applet and I got a gdm that constantly restarts. I logged it as an issue on bodhi since I didn't know if I was missing something since I pu

Broken dependencies with Fedora 14 + updates-testing - 2010-09-11

2010-09-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Fixed packages compared with F-14 Branched: RackTables cairo-java fmt-ptrn libgconf-java

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:38:12 -0400 Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > reverting gdm et al from koji works around this Switching to KDM probably also works, since I haven't had any login problems and I've been using KDM all along. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 09/11/2010 03:03 AM, Joachim Backes wrote: > Applying the most recent updates (including 1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686) > prevents from a graphical login: The gdm greeter is blinking in some > manner, no login pictures are shown, unable to select user. > > Could go back to a stable login by downgrad

Re: Firstboot fails to run after Beta TC1 CD installation - test case needed?

2010-09-11 Thread Clyde E. Kunkel
On 09/11/2010 01:30 PM, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > I did an install from CDs and it ran well all the way to the > installation of grub and rebooting. > Firstboot, howeve, failed to run and make the user entries. > > Bugzilla: 632880 > > SHould there be a test case for fistboot in the test results te

Firstboot fails to run after Beta TC1 CD installation - test case needed?

2010-09-11 Thread Gregory Woodbury
I did an install from CDs and it ran well all the way to the installation of grub and rebooting. Firstboot, howeve, failed to run and make the user entries. Bugzilla: 632880 SHould there be a test case for fistboot in the test results template? -- G.Wolfe Woodbury (redwolfe) -- test mailing li

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread Michał Piotrowski
The same here. I can't login :D Regards, Michal -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

rawhide report: 20100911 changes

2010-09-11 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Sep 11 08:15:17 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 09:03 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote: > Applying the most recent updates (including 1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686) > prevents from a graphical login: The gdm greeter is blinking in some > manner, no login pictures are shown, unable to select user. > > Could go back to a stable login

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-09-11 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing clive-2.2.15-1.fc12 cstream-2.7.6-4.fc12 gnome-commander-1.2.8.8-2.fc12 mediawiki-1.15.4-55.fc12 ncrack-0.3-0.1.ALPHA.fc12 nspr-4.8.6-1.fc12 nss-3.12.7-4.fc12 nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc12 nss-util-3

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-09-11 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing clive-2.2.15-1.fc13 cstream-2.7.6-4.fc13 gnome-commander-1.2.8.8-2.fc13 lohit-tamil-fonts-2.4.5-5.fc13 mediawiki-1.15.4-55.fc13 ncrack-0.3-0.1.ALPHA.fc13 perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.26-2.fc13 perl-Crypt

Re: trying to update to initscripts-9.20-1.fc14

2010-09-11 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:12:55 -0600, Petrus wrote: > Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > > > yum says: > > > > sysvinit-tools >= 2.87-5 is needed by initscripts-9.20-1.fc14.x86_64 > > > > Where do I find sysvinit-tools. Checked koji and there is no such package > > as sysvinit-tools. > > > > Never m

Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-11 Thread Joachim Backes
Applying the most recent updates (including 1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686) prevents from a graphical login: The gdm greeter is blinking in some manner, no login pictures are shown, unable to select user. Could go back to a stable login by downgrading to gdm-2.31.90-4.fc14.i686. Anybody sees this too?