The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing
clive-2.2.15-1.fc14
cstream-2.7.6-4.fc14
gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14
gnome-commander-1.2.8.8-2.fc14
gnome-panel-2.31.90-3.fc14
gnome-panel-2.31.90-4.fc14
libglpng-1.45-3.fc14
perl-Catalyst-Controller-ActionRo
On 09/11/2010 12:23 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> Shucks, you've released other fedora versions with stuff busted
>>> much worse than systemd - I say go for it (especially if it
>>> eventually leads to those rumored under 10 second boot times :-).
>> I don't think I read anyone really made that claim
Bill Nottingham:
> No, that's the default for the 'normal' released Fedora tree. We set
> it lower for the branched tree, but given that it's a config file, not
> everyone will get the change on upgrade.
Ah, that surely how it happened. Thanks again.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject
> > Shucks, you've released other fedora versions with stuff busted
> > much worse than systemd - I say go for it (especially if it
> > eventually leads to those rumored under 10 second boot times :-).
>
> I don't think I read anyone really made that claim and certainly not for
> this release.
ht
Göran Uddeborg (goe...@uddeborg.se) said:
> > In the 'main' F14 tree, under development/14.
>
> I see. And I had metadata_expire=7d for that repo. That explains it.
> Forcing a refresh indeed fixed the problem.
>
> (Did I really add that expiry? Oh, well, I guess I'm not supposed to
> underst
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 16:23:12 -0500,
> John Morris wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 00:14 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 23:18:00 -0500,
> > > John Morris wrote:
> > > >
> > > > And of course Network-M
Bill Nottingham:
> In the 'main' F14 tree, under development/14.
I see. And I had metadata_expire=7d for that repo. That explains it.
Forcing a refresh indeed fixed the problem.
(Did I really add that expiry? Oh, well, I guess I'm not supposed to
understand everything.)
Thanks for the help!
-
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:48:41 +0100
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > As you can see, we've already made a start on triaging and fixing the
> > bugs. FESCo is also discussing the final decision on whether to go ahead
> > with systemd for Fedora 14
Göran Uddeborg (goe...@uddeborg.se) said:
> I can of course do my upgrade by hardcoding my yum to look at one of
> those mirrors. But I would like to know what the "right" way is.
> Where am I supposed to find a "stable" update to F14?
In the 'main' F14 tree, under development/14.
Bill
--
test
I was trying to update a F14 alpha system, but yum ended with a
complaint that it wanted to install
kdepim-runtime-4.4.5-2.fc14.x86_64, and that needs
kdebase-runtime >= 4.5.1, which it can't find.
In bodhi I find that kdebase-runtime-4.5.1-1.fc14 was built and pushed
to "testing" on August 30 (FE
Petrus de Calguarium (pguec...@gmail.com) said:
> yum says:
>
> sysvinit-tools >= 2.87-5 is needed by initscripts-9.20-1.fc14.x86_64
>
> Where do I find sysvinit-tools. Checked koji and there is no such package as
> sysvinit-tools.
It's a subpackage of sysvinit. That package release is also in
Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> yum says:
>
> sysvinit-tools >= 2.87-5 is needed by initscripts-9.20-1.fc14.x86_64
>
> Where do I find sysvinit-tools. Checked koji and there is no such package
> as sysvinit-tools.
>
Never mind, I found it. It's listed under sysvinit and a search on koji, not
ev
yum says:
sysvinit-tools >= 2.87-5 is needed by initscripts-9.20-1.fc14.x86_64
Where do I find sysvinit-tools. Checked koji and there is no such package as
sysvinit-tools.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 12:06 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:18 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > > Greetings gang,
> > >
> > > From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
> > > need release
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 16:18 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Greetings gang,
> >
> > From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
> > need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related
> > to
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings gang,
>
> From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
> need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related
> to Fedora release artwork. I took an action item to draft up 2 criteria
Compose started at Fri Sep 10 13:15:24 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
On 09/09/2010 05:46 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1].
This image (http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14-Beta.TC1/i386/os/)
appears to be useless for network/kickstart installs. I've pxe booted the
images from there and downloaded the install.img from t
James, I'll go with that. I find it confusing if I have F13 and F14 on the
same box, and if the wrong artwork is used, it may get confusing.
Subject: Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork
From: jla...@redhat.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:49:55 -0400
Greetings gang,
From the last 2 F14 blocker bug meetings [1], it became apparent that we
need release criteria to describe how best to prioritize issues related
to Fedora release artwork. I took an action item to draft up 2 criteria
to describe the expectations around release artwork before Final
Compose started at Fri Sep 10 08:15:21 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1
avogadro-libs-1.0.1-
On 09/09/2010 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:45:59 +0200
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> 2010/9/9 Harald Hoyer:
>>> On 09/07/2010 02:41 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I want to compare systemd and upstart boot speed (I don't expect
much, so I won't be di
22 matches
Mail list logo
