Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2010-09-06 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing ConsoleKit-0.4.2-1.fc14 contextkit-0.5.15-1.fc14 culmus-fonts-0.105-1.fc14 dbus-1.4.0-1.fc14 flies-python-client-0.0.5-2.fc14 fuse-encfs-1.7.1-1.fc14 gajim-0.14-1.fc14.2 ghc-hinotify-0.3.1-4.fc14

Re: [Fedora QA] #120: Proposed Test Day - Preupgrade - 2010-09-02

2010-09-06 Thread Fedora QA
#120: Proposed Test Day - Preupgrade - 2010-09-02 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Day |

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:55 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > It is F14. It may be that there are updates pending to fix this, but > > they hadn't landed in time for the last nightly composes run. Note > > that the nightly compose pr

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

2010-09-06 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On Sat, 04 Sep 2010 23:10:11 -0400 Bill Davidsen wrote: > If they don't have time to look at everything, then maybe they should stop > shipping kernels they haven't looked at! Really, people who needed 2.6.34 > could > pull it from updates-untested and the rest of us could have working systems

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

2010-09-06 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:23:01 -0500 John Morris wrote: > In my case I reported #573135 back in March and stopped taking kernel > updates. In another month or so I'll boot a live USB stick of F14 and > see if the bug was fixed and just didn't get closed. Then it is either > suck it up and run with

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

2010-09-06 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On Thu, 2 Sep 2010 15:19:04 +1000 Rodd Clarkson wrote: > > Might I ask what great good has come from this? > Here's a list of bugs that were fixed by the 2.6.34 update and not by any specific fixes added by Fedora: 611123 - 2.6.33.5-124 on Dell E521 does not work with OCZ Vertex SSD drive 6078

finally squashed avahi-daemon :-).

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Horsley
Found the "mdns_adv=0" line in libvirtd.conf and uncommented it, and at last libvirtd no longer "helpfully" starts avahi-daemon. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread 益牙
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Jon Hermansen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: >> >> I don't even know if the MacBook Pro will show a BIOS screen. > > Apple provides BIOS emulation, but I'm not sure if it shows the POST output > you're probably used to. This is how they

Re: Why was a kernel-2.6.34 pushed to updates that had un-addressed bugs.

2010-09-06 Thread Richard Ryniker
>In my case (F13, x86_64 on a Lenovo X200) the .34 kernel made suspend fail. >On laptops I think working suspend/resume should be blocker for release. It >worked before, hence it is a regression. F13 was released with a .33 kernel, therefore the question of blocking the F13 release for this reas

Re: Why is avahi-daemon being started?

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:22:50 -0700 Jon Hermansen wrote: > What is the parent PID and process name of the running avahi-daemon you > found? I think I looked at that and it was owned by init, but that might just mean someone started it with the double-fork technique. I did find a "Should-start: ava

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Hi, I want to compare systemd and upstart boot speed (I don't expect much, so I won't be disappointed :)) systemd http://i56.tinypic.com/ilk4fq.jpg upstart http://i53.tinypic.com/dnhrvm.png both starts system in 31 seconds, but systemd starts much more services. It looks like ntsysv doesn't ha

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:41:53 +0100 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0100 > > Richard Hughes wrote: > > > > > On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > No, its F-14 and had been broken sinc

Re: Update to F-14 does not show desktop manager

2010-09-06 Thread Mike Chambers
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 18:28 +0100, José Matos wrote: > Hi, > > When I start the computer I am greeted with the console, the graphical > display > for the desktop manager does not show, be it kdm or gdm. > > Some more details: > > /etc/systemd/system/default.target points to > /lib/syste

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 13:00 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0100 > Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good > > > compose of gnome based (as in have gnome c

Re: Why is avahi-daemon being started?

2010-09-06 Thread Jon Hermansen
What is the parent PID and process name of the running avahi-daemon you found? That way we know who to blame. :p -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: Why is avahi-daemon being started?

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 15:46:23 -0700 Jon Hermansen wrote: Yep, systemctl, not sysctl (slip of the fingers :-). > Without knowing about systemd internals, it is quite possible that you have > a dependent service that requires avahi-daemon, so, even though you've > disabled avahi-daemon, another servi

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread Jon Hermansen
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:47 PM, Bob Cochran wrote: > I don't even know if the MacBook Pro will show a BIOS screen. Apple provides BIOS emulation, but I'm not sure if it shows the POST output you're probably used to. This is how they made their EFI-based systems compatible with Windows XP 32-bit

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread Bob Cochran
Thank you, Zoltan and Mark. I'm trying to figure my way around the Mac platform. But I want my Fedora, Ubuntu and Windows too. I don't even know if the MacBook Pro will show a BIOS screen. Ir if it will boot from USB or DVD. Still, it is just an Intel motherboard and processor stuffed into an

Re: Why is avahi-daemon being started?

2010-09-06 Thread Jon Hermansen
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > I've got *sysctl* disable avahi-daemon.service, yet whenever I boot > my f14 partition, I see avahi-daemon running anyway. > By sysctl, I assume you meant systemctl? sysctl is something else entirely. Without knowing about systemd internals,

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread Mark West
Yes it is possible. A free alternative to VMware or Parallels Desktop is a software known as Virtual Box. I have tested Virtual Box myself and have found that the installation is not always as simple as it seems and it may take several trys but after installation Virtual Box works much better than

Why is avahi-daemon being started?

2010-09-06 Thread Tom Horsley
I've got chkconfig --level 12345 avahi-daemon off, I've got sysctl disable avahi-daemon.service, yet whenever I boot my f14 partition, I see avahi-daemon running anyway. A "yum -C erase avahi" wants to remove all sorts of stuff that has no business depending on it, so I can't get rid of it by remo

Re: Alpha 14 Installation

2010-09-06 Thread Lawrence E Graves
I was trying to use the install dvd to install Alpha 14, however, I finally decided to try the live dvd and it works good. Keep up the good work. On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 11:27 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:35:14 -0600 > Lawrence E Graves wrote: > > > When I said please advise

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 13:00:31 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0100 > Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good > > > compose of gnome based (as in have

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 16:33:49 +0100 Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com > wrote: > > No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good > > compose of gnome based (as in have gnome components) spins was Aug > > 30th. You can see it in the daily branc

Re: Alpha 14 Installation

2010-09-06 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 04:35:14 -0600 Lawrence E Graves wrote: > When I said please advise, I was asking for the answer. I don't > understand how you disable kickstart file or where the kickstart file > is. Would be glad to change if I knew how. Thank you. I know you > are busy getting ready for

Update to F-14 does not show desktop manager

2010-09-06 Thread José Matos
Hi, I have updated today one (real) machine to F-14 using yum. Remarkably the process was very smooth, I had to remove (using rpm -e) python- zope-filesystem for the upgrade to work but otherwise it worked flawlessly. Well done Seth. :-) FWIW I had to update 4948 packages (I have texlive

Re: systemd-9-3.fc14 slows boot to crawl

2010-09-06 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 21:53 -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote: > 2. System log for tcsd.service shows: > > Sep 3 21:43:05 localhost TCSD TDDL[2610]: TrouSerS ERROR: Could not find a > device to > open! > Sep 3 21:43:05 localhost init[1]: tcsd.service: control process exited, > code=exited >

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 16:33:49 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > > No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good compose > > of gnome based (as in have gnome components) spins was Aug 30th. You > > can see it in the daily

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Richard Hughes
On 6 September 2010 15:51, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > No, its F-14 and had been broken since Aug 31st. The last good compose > of gnome based (as in have gnome components) spins was Aug 30th. You > can see it in the daily branched report [1]. Right, all my packages (gnome-packagekit, gnome-pow

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 16:55:57 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > It is F14. It may be that there are updates pending to fix this, but > > they hadn't landed in time for the last nightly composes run. Note > > that the nightly co

F-14 Branched report: 20100906 changes

2010-09-06 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 6 13:16:04 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Sven Lankes
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 09:43:31AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > It is F14. It may be that there are updates pending to fix this, but > they hadn't landed in time for the last nightly composes run. Note > that the nightly compose process uses only F14 stable, not testing. So > fixes that haven't

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread pbrobin...@gmail.com
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to >> show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed: >> manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 requires l

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 15:41:48 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to > > show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed: > > manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i6

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Richard Hughes
On 6 September 2010 15:30, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > Note that there is an update pending for systemd-9-3 that isn't going to > show up in the nightly builds until the following dep issues are fixed: > manager-2.31.4-1.fc14.i686 requires libgnome-control-center.so.1 > gnome-packagekit-2.31.4-2.fc14

Re: [Test-Announce] Systemd Test Day on Tuesday 2010/09/07

2010-09-06 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 00:36:38 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > As usual, we've tried to make it as easy as possible to participate. > There's full testing instructions on the Test Day wiki page, and you can > contribute some helpful testing just by running a nightly live image[2] > and maki

2010-09-06 - No Fedora QA meeting scheduled

2010-09-06 Thread jlaska
Greetings, There is no QA meeting scheduled for today. However, if folks are interested in getting together, please take notes. You can find minutes from last weeks meeting on the wiki at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100830 Thanks, James -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorap

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread Zoltan Kota
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Bob Cochran wrote: >  Is it possible to install Fedora on an Apple MacBook Pro? Yes, it should be. I have an F13 parallel with MacOSX on my Macbook Pro (2 years old). First of all, you can check if you can boot your machine with a Fedora Live CD. Zoltan -- test m

rawhide report: 20100906 changes

2010-09-06 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 6 08:15:36 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- RackTables-0.18.4-1.fc15.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch) antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 claws-mail-plugins-g

Re: Alpha 14 Installation

2010-09-06 Thread Lawrence E Graves
When I said please advise, I was asking for the answer. I don't understand how you disable kickstart file or where the kickstart file is. Would be glad to change if I knew how. Thank you. I know you are busy getting ready for Beta release. Maybe I should wait for it before I try installation.

Re: Fedora On MacBook Pro

2010-09-06 Thread Mark Mahabir
The easiest way to do this is via a virtual machine e.g. install Parallels or VMware Fusion. Mark On 6 September 2010 01:37, Bob Cochran wrote: >  Is it possible to install Fedora on an Apple MacBook Pro? > > Thanks > > Bob Cochran > > -- > test mailing list > test@lists.fedoraproject.org > To u

[Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day 2010-09-02 Recap

2010-09-06 Thread He Rui
Greetings, Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely covered with its bugs filed and verified. The common issue testers encountered during preupgrade has been identified to be an anaconda bug: 62

Re: Alpha 14 Installation

2010-09-06 Thread He Rui
On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 18:56 -0600, Lawrence E Graves wrote: > When trying to install Alpha 14, it comes to a halt with this error > message: > Line 65 does not end with %%end. I don't understand that. Please > advise. Did you install with kickstart file? If yes, you need the "%end" there in the