Re: Where is runlevel 5?

2010-08-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/29/2010 02:04 AM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > It helps immensly if you are in a position to distinguish between > "real" info, a pure voodoo magic which once gave an impression that > it worked, accidental and/or intentional workarounds for bugs which > will be gone in some future version - m

Re: No shutdown after upgrade 8-28-10

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 16:47:57 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > This is a new one, latest upgrade to FC14a3 resulted in it refusing to shut > down. And after I did a sync and took it down the file systems were unhappy on > reboot. Oh well, it was alpha. > > Some final screen dumps are in www.tmr

No shutdown after upgrade 8-28-10

2010-08-28 Thread Bill Davidsen
This is a new one, latest upgrade to FC14a3 resulted in it refusing to shut down. And after I did a sync and took it down the file systems were unhappy on reboot. Oh well, it was alpha. Some final screen dumps are in www.tmr.com/~davidsen/FC14 if anyone cares, I just was wondering if others had th

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

2010-08-28 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:30:35AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > Do you happen to mean that: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_release_notes# > Better_System_and_Session_Management > I just quoted

Re: Where is runlevel 5?

2010-08-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > Do you happen to mean that: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Alpha_release_notes#Better_System_and_Session_Management > I just quoted the whole entry. If somewhere else there is something > "real" then I would start by putti

Re: systemd and prefdm issue

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 13:19:51 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > When testing reboots today, systemd (8-3) is no longer starting prefdm. > It tries to start it a few tiomes and it doesn't start fast enough and > then it is given up on. I can go into a vt as root and run > systemctl start service

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:11:26 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > So I am back to not knowing if something got stuffed up locally due to > upgrading and down grading or if there is an actual problem with the > default setup not making sure dbus was up before trying to start prefdm. It was a m

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:55:59 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:34:40 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > My /home is a separate > > encrypted partition on the machines I have seen the problem on. > > I just have one partition at the moment and no encryption > going on, so

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:34:40 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > My /home is a separate > encrypted partition on the machines I have seen the problem on. I just have one partition at the moment and no encryption going on, so that is a difference. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To u

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 11:01:36 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:49:13 -0500 > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > The prefdm problem is new. It appears to be that for some reason it won't > > run properly during the boot, but you can start it by the time you get > > the maintenance

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sat, 28 Aug 2010 09:49:13 -0500 Bruno Wolff III wrote: > The prefdm problem is new. It appears to be that for some reason it won't > run properly during the boot, but you can start it by the time you get > the maintenance prompt. Weird, I have all the updates and I'm getting a normal login pro

F-14 Branched report: 20100828 changes

2010-08-28 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Sat Aug 28 13:15:30 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Bruno Wolff III
> > > My F14 system is doing this as well, updated as of yesterday. > > > Looks > > > like it stops during boot and requires root password for > > > maint. But > > > after that, you can init 5 and boot continues to gdm login > > > screen. > > >

Re: Interesting New results with F14 ALpha

2010-08-28 Thread Mike Chambers
On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 11:27 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 12:24 +0300, cornel panceac wrote: > > > > > > 2010/8/27 Mike Chambers > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 19:17 -0700, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX > > N2469R wrote: > > > > > After a couple of yum

Trying spice?

2010-08-28 Thread Tom Horsley
Is there a short and sweet example somewhere showing what I need to do in fedora 14 alpha to try out the spice desktop in a windows XP virtual machine? (Like the best version of the windows drivers to download, and how to run the viewer - can I use libvirt at all, or do I need to run qemu directly,

Re: bootup failure with F14(Aug-27 tree) with systemd (after adding the symlinks & reboot)

2010-08-28 Thread cornel panceac
2010/8/28 Kashyap Chamarthy > > - > # ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target > /etc/systemd/system/default.target) > > # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target > /etc/systemd/system/default.target > - > it worked for me with grap

rawhide report: 20100828 changes

2010-08-28 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Aug 28 08:15:20 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

bootup failure with F14(Aug-27 tree) with systemd (after adding the symlinks & reboot)

2010-08-28 Thread Kashyap Chamarthy
Hi, I still notice fresh F14(Aug27-build) install(a kvm guest) doesn't boot into runlevel-3 with systemd. I added these two symlink's from Lennart's email, and rebooted without any special kernel parameters - # ln -s /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target /etc/sy