On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 21:37 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058
>
I can reproduce this hard disk install issue. I've also made some tests
and it's probably because that the directories specified under the disk
are not honored as kernel parameters, which m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627058
I can't get installing from hard disk to work at all.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073
Once I make a real DVD from the iso and boot from that,
I can't get any X to work at all.
I'll have to try VNC when I have more time and se
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing
curl-7.20.1-4.fc13
d-feet-0.1.12-1.fc13
dvdbackup-0.4.1-1.fc13
empathy-2.30.3-1.fc13
evolution-2.30.3-1.fc13
evolution-data-server-2.30.3-1.fc13
evolution-exchange-2.30.3-1.fc13
evolution-mapi-0.30.3
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing
curl-7.19.7-13.fc12
fedora-packager-0.5.1.3-1.fc12
gnash-0.8.8-1.fc12
guake-0.4.2-2.fc12
guilt-0.33-1.fc12
iperf-2.0.5-1.fc12
john-1.7.6-1.fc12
opencc-0.1.1-1.fc12
python-slip-0.2.12-1.fc12
p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/24/10 12:18 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:05:10 -0400,
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>>
>> This has been bugging me. I wonder if there is something we can do to
>> speed up packages going from updates-candidate to updates-t
#104: F14 systemd Test Day
---+
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 15:05 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > > On 08/24/2010 05:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > There's an update to gnome-desktop3 pending which
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 15:05:10 -0400,
Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> This has been bugging me. I wonder if there is something we can do to
> speed up packages going from updates-candidate to updates-testing ? Will
> we get this automated when autoqa takes effect ?
Another annoying effect is whe
Matthias Clasen (mcla...@redhat.com) said:
> > Of course. I meant to wait until it lands in updates-testing.
>
> This has been bugging me. I wonder if there is something we can do to
> speed up packages going from updates-candidate to updates-testing ? Will
> we get this automated when autoqa tak
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 08:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 08/24/2010 05:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > There's an update to gnome-desktop3 pending which resolves the issue.
> > > Just wait.
> >
> > You know since this
Richard W.M. Jones (rjo...@redhat.com) said:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 04:42:17PM +, Branched Report wrote:
> > 1:libguestfs-1.5.2-4.fc14.i686 requires /lib/libxtables.so.4
>
> This seems to be a warning about an older version than what's
> currently in F14:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 08:07:14 -0700,
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> > On 08/24/2010 05:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > There's an update to gnome-desktop3 pending which resolves the issue.
> > > Just wait.
> >
> > You know sin
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 10:32 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 05:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > There's an update to gnome-desktop3 pending which resolves the issue.
> > Just wait.
>
> You know since this is the test list and we are testers, the proper way
> to handle situa
Compose started at Tue Aug 24 08:15:26 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.i686 requires libpoppler.so.6
OpenSceneGraph-libs-2.8.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires
libpoppler.so.6()(64bit)
PragmA
On 08/24/2010 05:23 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's an update to gnome-desktop3 pending which resolves the issue.
> Just wait.
You know since this is the test list and we are testers, the proper way
to handle situation like these is to install the pending update and
provide feedback and k
2010/8/24 Caolán McNamara :
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> can someone explain the difference between /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9,
>> /usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0 and /usr/bin/openoffice.org in F14?
>
> There's no difference, "1.9" and "2.0" were basically ac
On 08/24/2010 09:47 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> can someone explain the difference between /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9,
>> /usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0 and /usr/bin/openoffice.org in F14?
>
> There's no difference, "1.9" and "2.
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 07:01 +0200, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can someone explain the difference between /usr/bin/openoffice.org-1.9,
> /usr/bin/openoffice.org-2.0 and /usr/bin/openoffice.org in F14?
There's no difference, "1.9" and "2.0" were basically accidentally
versioned back in the day
18 matches
Mail list logo
