Message: 12 Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:05:12 -0700 From: Adam Williamson
Subject: Re: test Digest, Vol 77, Issue 32 To: For
testers of Fedora development releases
Message-ID: <1279227912.1985.40.ca...@adam.local.net> Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 22:13 +0200,
#96: Proven tester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: metabox | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: trivial | Milestone:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing
alienarena-7.40-2.fc12
alienarena-data-20100715-1.fc12
cobbler-2.0.5-1.fc12
gnome-applet-netspeed-0.16-3.fc12
ibus-m17n-1.3.0-2.fc12
kmymoney2-1.0.5-1.fc12
lv2-EQ10Q-plugins-1.0-6.fc12
pidgin-privacy
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing
alienarena-7.40-2.fc13
alienarena-data-20100715-1.fc13
cobbler-2.0.5-1.fc13
cpufrequtils-008-1.fc13
fedora-kde-icon-theme-0.0.2-3.fc13
gnome-applet-netspeed-0.16-3.fc13
ibus-m17n-1.3.0-2.fc13
kmymone
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 11:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:16 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > Alpha: when booting a traditional installer image, the boot sequence
> > > should be such that the system boots into the installer (after a
> > > reasonable timeout for any opt
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:16 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Alpha: when booting a traditional installer image, the boot sequence
> > should be such that the system boots into the installer (after a
> > reasonable timeout for any optional user input, if appropriate) without
> > the need for any user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/16/2010 10:45 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> What does everyone think would be best here? One of the above, or some
> other option? Thanks!
I feel that this should block Alpha. To put out an alpha that looks
like this will cause a significant amo
Hey, folks. We had a somewhat contentious bug come up in the blocker
meeting this morning:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614488
the graphical boot menu that should come up when you boot the installer
currently isn't. None of our existing Alpha, Beta or Final release
criteria deals w
Meeting summary
---
* LINK:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990&hide_resolved=1
(adamw, 16:03:18)
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 (poelcat,
16:05:35)
* LINK: http://tinyurl.com/2apxuo7 (adamw, 16:05:49)
* ACTION: https://bug
#107: Request for a mentor
-+--
Reporter: aalam| Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component:
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Unable to duplicate ( firefox-3.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64 )
>
I haven't the foggiest idea how to duplicate the problem, as it has only ever
occurred once in all the years I have been using firefox.
> Include on your report also what news feed you were subscripted to wh
On 07/16/2010 12:32 AM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> I have firefox-3.6.4-1.fc13.x86_64 installed. Not sure if that is from updates
> or updates-testing.
>
> I was just reading some feeds from google reader, when firefox abruptly
> crashed. When I restarted it, a message appeared stating that fi
Compose started at Fri Jul 16 08:15:19 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ
13 matches
Mail list logo
