>
> Still I think that I figured it out. It appears that a powered
> switch on my network decided to misbehave. After resetting it I
> started to see wired interfaces dynamically configured again. A
> mystery remains how my printer got its IP number. It is hanging
> from the same switch. Reall
>
> If the maintainer does not have the time to maintain his own component
> he should ask for ( more ) co maintainer ship or do the community and
> the distro a favour and drop the component from Fedora or allow some one
> who does have the time and the skills necessary to take over the component.
--- On Mon, 7/12/10, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
> From: Michal Jaegermann
> Subject: Re: dynamic configuration of wired network interfaces looks quite
> broken
> To: "For testers of Fedora development releases"
>
> Date: Monday, July 12, 2010, 1:13 PM
> xuTMoÛ8½óWré�c'è¡ð!hÑÝ`]
> M¤è™–F×GKRQõ
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 09:55:40PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>
> Does setting static IP address on the interface work?
It does. I wrote that in the original posting and this was making
things more puzzling. Yesterday I applied over 1 Gig of updates to
a rawhide installation using st
Did you try older kernel and have you tried to wireshark the interface
to see if it actually sends the dhcp request?
Does setting static IP address on the interface work?
JBG
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/te
On 07/12/2010 07:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Why is it "simply ludicrous"? It only needs following simple
> instructions. You don't really need to learn anything for this. I'm not
> asking $grandma to do it
How are you going to determine that's it's was not '$grandma' was not
actually the one t
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:18:00PM -0400, Richard Ryniker wrote:
> The most simple (and perhaps too obvious) explanation would be your DHCP
> server is not configured to respond to requests from the wired network
> interace, but responds appropriately to requests from the wireless
> network interfa
#105: F14 Graphics Test Week
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
#104: F14 systemd Test Day
--+-
Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill
Type: defect| Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Test Day | Version:
Ke
On 07/12/2010 07:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> It's a topic that's currently under discussion on -devel. In practice
> I'd say it varies. Some reporters certainly are willing to make good
> upstream reports. Some aren't, indeed, but I think Ankur's probably
> right that we can add value to the
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 19:21 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> It's packager/maintainer duty to be the bridge between upstream
> bugzilla and ours.
>
> It cant be expected nor required of either triagers and or reporters to
> create account and familiar themselves with upstream bugzilla and
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 10:50 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 12/07/10 10:01, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 07/12/2010 11:39 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> I'm doing something wrong but what is the correct sequence to build for
> >> more that one arch, mock --help\man not throwing much light for me.
> >>
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:00 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 2:58 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'm just trying to think of a way to make
> > users more involved in filing bugs and helping up stream in fixing
> > them.
> I'm sure your motives are pure :-). I just don't think what you are
It's packager/maintainer duty to be the bridge between upstream
bugzilla and ours.
It cant be expected nor required of either triagers and or reporters to
create account and familiar themselves with upstream bugzilla and
procedures and to even suggest that is simply ludicrous.
Those packager
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 15:00 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 7/12/2010 2:58 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'm just trying to think of a way to make
> > users more involved in filing bugs and helping up stream in fixing
> > them.
> I'm sure your motives are pure :-). I just don't think what you are
On 7/12/2010 2:58 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'm just trying to think of a way to make
> users more involved in filing bugs and helping up stream in fixing
> them.
I'm sure your motives are pure :-). I just don't think what you are
proposing is realistic.
jik
--
test mailing list
test@lists.
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 18:47 +, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I don't think it is reasonable to expect bug reporters to interact directly
> with the upstream maintainer. Perhaps they should, but they won't. I
> therefore don't think a bug should be CLOSED UPSTREAM unless the package
> maintainer h
I don't think it is reasonable to expect bug reporters to interact directly
with the upstream maintainer. Perhaps they should, but they won't. I therefore
don't think a bug should be CLOSED UPSTREAM unless the package maintainer has
extracted enough information from the reporter to submit a comp
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 11:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 13:37 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I've just been reading up the thread on -devel regarding the "WONTFIX".
> >
> > Out of curiosity, I googled "site:fedoraproject.org reporting bugs".
> >
> > I found 3
The most simple (and perhaps too obvious) explanation would be your DHCP
server is not configured to respond to requests from the wired network
interace, but responds appropriately to requests from the wireless
network interface. It this used to work, perhaps something changed your
DHCP server's c
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 13:37 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've just been reading up the thread on -devel regarding the "WONTFIX".
>
> Out of curiosity, I googled "site:fedoraproject.org reporting bugs".
>
> I found 3 pages of interest. Surprisingly, none of them mention anything
> about fi
As always, IRC transcript and minutes available on the wiki at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20100712
= Attendees =
People present (lines said):
* jlaska (133)
* wwoods (121)
* adamw (67)
* j_dulaney (66)
* kparal (29)
* Viking-Ice (25
Start End Name
Thu 08-Jul Fri 16-Jul Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance Test Plan #1
Tue 13-Jul Tue 13-Jul Feature Submission Deadline
Thu 15-Jul Thu 22-Jul Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance Test Plan #2
Fri 16-Jul Fri 16-Jul Alpha Blocker Meeting (f14alpha) #1
Thu 22-Jul Thu 29-Jul Pr
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 09:16 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
> and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
> Bodhi proventester bottleneck (see forwarded announcement below)
>
> -
Hello!
This week at FUDCon Santiago we are willing to update the F13 QA
Template [1] in order to improve it for using on Fedora's next release.
If someone has some thoughts on this please let us know.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_13_l10n_Results_Template
Regards,
Igor
--
test m
Before I will waste more time on that does anybody know what broke
dhclient on _wired_ interfaces?
I was away for quite a while now and upon return I found that although
I can still use DHCP to configure wireless interfaces of my laptops
this is totally different story for _wired_ ones. In the fi
On 07/12/2010 01:19 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> Thers an ongoing thread on devel list.
There have been many threads on the development list through out several
release cycles about this issue.
All those thread led nowhere and all those thread had all little to no
input from the QA community and
On 12/07/10 14:13, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>On 07/12/2010 01:00 PM, James Laska wrote:
>>6. Open discussion
> There's one issue that needs to be discussed and resolved and that's
> maintainers ignoring their packaging responsibility by not being the
> bridge between upstream and
On 07/12/2010 01:00 PM, James Laska wrote:
> 6. Open discussion
There's one issue that needs to be discussed and resolved and that's
maintainers ignoring their packaging responsibility by not being the
bridge between upstream and bugzilla refusing to resolve outstanding
bugs and forcing
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2010-07-12
# Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1]
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings gang,
If you haven't noticed, things are really heating up in preparation for
the upcoming release. I'd like to review a few upcoming act
Compose started at Mon Jul 12 08:15:22 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ
On 07/12/2010 12:50 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 12/07/10 10:01, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> for ARCH in fedora-12-i386 fedora-12-x86_64 fedora-rawhide-i386 ; do
>>mock -r $ARCH mypackage.src.rpm
>> done
>>
>
> Is it basically bash script?
> I'm not excellent currently with a cli.
Yes, it is.
On 12/07/10 10:01, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 07/12/2010 11:39 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
>> I'm doing something wrong but what is the correct sequence to build for
>> more that one arch, mock --help\man not throwing much light for me.
>>
>> mock -r fedora12.i386 fedora12.x86_64 fedora 13.xx fedoraDevel
On 07/12/2010 11:39 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> I'm doing something wrong but what is the correct sequence to build for
> more that one arch, mock --help\man not throwing much light for me.
>
> mock -r fedora12.i386 fedora12.x86_64 fedora 13.xx fedoraDevel.xx
> --rebuild --resultdir=/some/local/path
I'm doing something wrong but what is the correct sequence to build for
more that one arch, mock --help\man not throwing much light for me.
mock -r fedora12.i386 fedora12.x86_64 fedora 13.xx fedoraDevel.xx
--rebuild --resultdir=/some/local/path somesrc.rpm
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Enco
hi,
I've just been reading up the thread on -devel regarding the "WONTFIX".
Out of curiosity, I googled "site:fedoraproject.org reporting bugs".
I found 3 pages of interest. Surprisingly, none of them mention anything
about filing bugs upstream. Can someone please add this info to the
wiki? It w
#95: Create installation test results template and test plan for F-14
+---
Reporter: rhe| Owner: rhe
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: W
correction: 1 proventester needed, not two. Thanks in advance.
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
> and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
> Bodhi provent
Hi folks,
libsndfile for EL-5 has had a security vulnerability for many months,
and now that it is actively maintained again, unfortunately hit the
Bodhi proventester bottleneck (see forwarded announcement below)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Luke Macken
Subject: Bodhi 0.7.5 rele
39 matches
Mail list logo
