On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
> As a side note - google chrome has native flash builtin ..
No it doesn't ... it just ships with the flash plugin bundled but it
does not have "native flash support".
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
htt
On 07/07/2010 07:01 PM, birger wrote:
There is no 64 bit build for windows? Wow. I didn't expect that. Perhaps
i am getting too distant from that other os.
Microsoft ships the 32-bit IE as the default browser even on 64 bit
builds just so the plugins work (AFAICT).
No matter why they remove
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 06:55 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 09:22 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
> > ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior when it comes to
> > directories in the /media folde
On 07/07/2010 09:22 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
> ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior when it comes to
> directories in the /media folder.
>
> The partition names are:
> Ankur_backup, Stuff, NTFS Temp
>
>
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 13:23 -0600, Kevin DeKorte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/07/2010 01:22 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
> > ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior
#101: ProvenTester Mentor requesr: redwolfe (G.Wolfe Woodbury)
--+-
Reporter: redwolfe | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major
Hi Bob,
You could reply this directly in the ticket[!], which is used to track
your request. But no worries, I've already sponsored you. Thanks for
application, and happy testing! :)
Cheers,
Hurry
[!] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/99
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 07:55 -0400, Bob Ligh
#99: Proven Tester Mentor Request
--+-
Reporter: boblfoot | Owner: rhe
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 22:29 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> As a side note - google chrome has native flash builtin ..
But alas, Chromium doesn't (for obvious reasons).
poc
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
As a side note - google chrome has native flash builtin ..
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
There is no 64 bit build for windows? Wow. I didn't expect that. Perhaps i am
getting too distant from that other os.
No matter why they removed the 64 bit build (being as closed as it is we can
only guess anyway) it ought to generate more interest in getting gnash fixed
up. It seems to have
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:01:06 -0400
Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> Dear Proven Testers and those in mentoring:
> I've been wondering lately is there a place in IRC where QA and
> the Proven Testers can exchange near real time information on what we
> are testing. I know that most information pass
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 18:01 -0400, Bob Lightfoot wrote:
> Dear Proven Testers and those in mentoring:
> I've been wondering lately is there a place in IRC where QA and
> the Proven Testers can exchange near real time information on what we
> are testing. I know that most information passes
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 14:19 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
> Silly idea...how about assigning a requirement that each bugfix (or at
> least a majority of them) in a kernel require positive karma before the
> kernel is blessed? The idea is that most bugfixes are just that--fixes.
> Otherwise it'd be s
Dear Proven Testers and those in mentoring:
I've been wondering lately is there a place in IRC where QA and
the Proven Testers can exchange near real time information on what we
are testing. I know that most information passes thru
test@lists.fedoraproject.org but I was wondering as prove
On 07/07/2010 12:29 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> Thinking about it, though, we could consider a slightly different
>> process for the kernel, as it's a component that's *extremely* subject
>> to different experiences for different users. I'm
#76: Use two methods to specify install source
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki
#100: mentor request
--+-
Reporter: mrunge | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone:
#101: ProvenTester Mentor requesr: redwolfe (G.Wolfe Woodbury)
--+-
Reporter: redwolfe | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major
I am wondering, how hard would it be to modify Bodhi to require extra Karma for
kernels? Who should I talk to about this possibility?
John, Son of Clay.
> Subject: Re: Proven tester wiki love
> From: awill...@redhat.com
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 12:16:47 -0700
>
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 12:40 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> >> Tes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/6/10 5:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
>> Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
>>
>> We've run out of tim
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Thinking about it, though, we could consider a slightly different
> process for the kernel, as it's a component that's *extremely* subject
> to different experiences for different users. I'm not sure the workflow
> we've designed will work
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 20:31 +0200, birger wrote:
>> The claim i saw was that they had chosen to redesign the 64 bit flash
>> completely.
>>
>> Given that windows seems to be quickly abandoning 32 bit support
>> (first on servers) a completel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 01:22 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
> ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior when it comes to
> directories in the /media folder.
>
> The partitio
hi,
I'm using a Seagate USB hard drive which is divided into 3 partitions, 2
ext3 and one NTFS. There is new very weird behavior when it comes to
directories in the /media folder.
The partition names are:
Ankur_backup, Stuff, NTFS Temp
at times when I plug in my external HDD, the /media dir has
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 19:22 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 19:33 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote:
> >> I went to work a bit on jdulaney's fork of the proven tester page to
> >> make the mentorship-merging stuff fit a little m
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 20:31 +0200, birger wrote:
> The claim i saw was that they had chosen to redesign the 64 bit flash
> completely.
>
> Given that windows seems to be quickly abandoning 32 bit support
> (first on servers) a completely rewritten 64 bit flash makes sense
> even if it means more
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 20:01 +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm a Fedora Rawhide tester, obviously I have FAS account and Bugzilla
> account and i whish to join a group
>
> which one is the most appropriate ?
>
>
> I have read about "Proven tester" [1], i whish to know much hou
Hello all,
I'm a Fedora Rawhide tester, obviously I have FAS account and Bugzilla
account and i whish to join a group
which one is the most appropriate ?
I have read about "Proven tester" [1], i whish to know much hours per
days should i spare to that ?
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Prov
The claim i saw was that they had chosen to redesign the 64 bit flash
completely.
Given that windows seems to be quickly abandoning 32 bit support (first on
servers) a completely rewritten 64 bit flash makes sense even if it means more
maintenance. It may mean that 32 bit flash becomes a light
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 19:33 -0500, Aaron Faanes wrote:
>> I went to work a bit on jdulaney's fork of the proven tester page to
>> make the mentorship-merging stuff fit a little more smoothly, and I
>> sort of got carried away. I'd normally j
On 07/07/2010 04:30 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
> All of these are issues that are stopping me from being able to do my
> work effectively and efficiently...
Rawhide is no go for work efficiency hence dont run rawhide on you're
workstation it will more or less eat babies atleast up to freeze.
Secon
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:25 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Sounds good to me and seems like others share the opinion, I will
> > update the wiki today to reflect the change as well as add the step
> > for applying to FAS in the table as fenris02 pointed out to me that it
> > appears to be missing.
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 07:55 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> >Just to note that the maintainer did actually submit an update for this,
> >> >but it doesn't seem to have been pushed yet, for no apparent reason.
> >> >I've asked releng about this.
> >>
> >> Reason: I started the push last Friday. If
#78: Request for Mentor
--+-
Reporter: robatino | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
I wasn't being snarky, I was being pragmatic.
You're absolutely right that a triager should have looked at the bug in
bugzilla, tried to reproduce it, and comment on the results. I can't comment on
why that didn't happen. What I was commenting on was the fact that when a bug
sits untouched for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2010 09:59 AM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> The issue with nspluginwrapper and the 64-bit plugin remains, however.
> But since Adobe has pulled the 64-bit plugin for now, we'll have to wait
> and see if the new version still has the probl
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 17:41:14 +0200, Marcela wrote:
> On 07/02/2010 12:17 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
> >
> > ==
> > The results in this summary consider
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:04 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 7/7/2010 10:44 AM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > Not true. Just because YOU can't reproduce it doesn't mean it isn't
> > happening. Others have reproduced the problem and also commented as such
> > on the bug report.
> Whether or n
#69: Proventester mentor request
--+-
Reporter: mcloaked | Owner: jlaska
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
>[Adobe]
>I want to know why they should {want} to screw us out of the internet
I doubt very much Adobe wants to limit our access to the Internet. Adobe
wants to apply its development resources in the way that maximizes its
profit.
Adobe may feel 64-bit Flash for Linux would be profitable (i
On 7/7/2010 10:44 AM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
Not true. Just because YOU can't reproduce it doesn't mean it isn't
happening. Others have reproduced the problem and also commented as such
on the bug report.
Whether or not other commenters on the bug have reproduced the problem
is mostly i
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:28 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
>> Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being
>> able to use and benefit from the web content that should be available
>> to all!
>
> Take another look at my ea
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 21:30 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> It seems like there are several issues right now:
> an accessibility problem...
> a bonobo issue
> nautilus
> gedit
> nouveau driver
> gramps
>
> All of these are issues that are stopping me from being able to do my
> work effectively and eff
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 10:01 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 7/7/2010 9:55 AM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> > Thanks for the pointer. Your install method works just great.
> >
> > ...Unfortunately, it also still means that certain sites still do not
> > play video correctly due to issues with
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:28 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being
> able to use and benefit from the web content that should be available
> to all!
Take another look at my earlier reply, which you seem to have
misunderstood. I have full acces
On 7/7/2010 9:55 AM, Christopher A. Williams wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer. Your install method works just great.
>
> ...Unfortunately, it also still means that certain sites still do not
> play video correctly due to issues with nspluginwrapper. I'd hate to
> think that this bug, #579092 which
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 01:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:38 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > > Greetings:
> > >
> > > Is there anything that can be used as a substitute for the flash
> > > player since Adobe
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 08:10 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> >> Hello testers!
> >>
> >> I wanted to open a conversation on the list about how we want to as a
> >> group handle sponsorship
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:47 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
>> Hello testers!
>>
>> I wanted to open a conversation on the list about how we want to as a
>> group handle sponsorship. I wanted to propose two ideas I had and
>> leave the floor open
From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Rob Healey
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 4:29 AM
To: Fedora rawhide test list
Subject: 64bit Flash player
Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being able to use
and b
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 17:10 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> > Hard to believe, but Fedora QA starts its "Pre-Alpha Rawhide Acceptance
> > Test Plan" testing this Thursday (2010-07-08).
> >
> > We've run out of time and run way to implement
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 05:49:22PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 21:29 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 12:50:23PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:03 +, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> >> ===
Dear rhe:
Forgive the delay in my response. Somehow I missed your initial
email notifying me I had been assigned a potential sponsor. To answer
your quesitons.
1.I have reviewed the proven testers guidelines and followed
them for most all testing I've done since applying for spon
Compose started at Wed Jul 7 08:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
CodeAnalyst-gui-2.8.54-22.fc14.i686 requires libdwarf.so.0.0
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 re
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 21:30 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> Greetings:
>
> I have been using rawhide for a very long time now, and I have been
> having problems with gnome for a few days now...
>
> It seems like there are several issues right now:
> an accessibility problem...
> a bonobo issue
>
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 05:38:32AM -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/07/07 01:28 (GMT-0700) Rob Healey composed:
>
> [Adobe]
> > I want to know why thay should to screw us out of the internet
>
> I have to think it's about money and DRM. Adobe has never released a Flash
> version for the ti
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 01:44:20AM -0400, Chris Kloiber wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 11:16 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>
>> There's an alpha release of 64bit flash that works well enough(like poc
>> said, this one has as many problems as usual flash)
>>
>> you can look at the fedoraproject.org wiki page on fl
#78: Request for Mentor
--+-
Reporter: robatino | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone:
On 2010/07/07 01:28 (GMT-0700) Rob Healey composed:
[Adobe]
> I want to know why thay should to screw us out of the internet
I have to think it's about money and DRM. Adobe has never released a Flash
version for the tiny OS/2 market, because nobody has paid them the big money
they want to do
On 07/07/2010 04:28 AM, Rob Healey wrote:
Dear poc, Ankue, and Chris:
Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being able
to use and benefit from the web content that should be available to all!
If anyone who reads this that knows someone at Adobe, I would like to
get a reps
Dear poc, Ankue, and Chris:
Thanks for the information! So we really are alienated from being able to
use and benefit from the web content that should be available to all!
If anyone who reads this that knows someone at Adobe, I would like to get a
repsonse from Adobe!!!
I want to know why thay
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:53 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 16:38 -0700, Rob Healey wrote:
> > Greetings:
> >
> > Is there anything that can be used as a substitute for the flash
> > player since Adobe refuses and alienates 64bit users?
> >
> > They either expect us to u
#97: Request for a mentor
--+-
Reporter: masami | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone:
#78: Request for Mentor
--+-
Reporter: robatino | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone:
#75: proventester mentor request: rdieter
--+-
Reporter: rdieter | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: assigned
Priority: major|
#64: Mentor request for proventesters
--+-
Reporter: schaiba | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Mile
#67: Request for Mentor
--+-
Reporter: kparnell | Owner: adamwill
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
#76: Use two methods to specify install source
--+-
Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Component: Wiki
70 matches
Mail list logo