Re: Proventesters START!

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Miller
Yes! So happy to see this rolling. I will be sure to fire up a fresh pair of VMs tomorrow to join the fun! Thanks again to everyone involved! -AdamM (From Android) On Jun 29, 2010 10:29 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: So, Luke has kicked in Bodhi's requirement for proventester feedback for critpa

rawhide dependency issue

2010-06-29 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: I am only writing this message, so the information is available to those who make the updated packages On the updates for gnome3, there are several dependency issues: Error: Package: 1:control-center-2.31.3-2.fc14.x86_64 (@rawhide) Requires: libgdk_pixbuf-3.0.so.0()(64b

Proventesters START!

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Williamson
So, Luke has kicked in Bodhi's requirement for proventester feedback for critpath updates for F13 - thanks Luke! We also have new features in Bodhi to conveniently spot upcoming critpath updates, see Luke's email for that. So as of right now, we need to make sure we're on top of testing these upda

[Fedora QA] #99: Proven Tester Mentor Request

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#99: Proven Tester Mentor Request -+-- Reporter: boblfoot | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Compo

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread Luke Macken
On 06/29/2010 03:50 PM, James Laska wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:26 -0400, James Laska wrote: >> >>> I just discovered that it might be possible to use the command-line >>> bodhi tool to gather this information. >>> >>> # bo

Re: [Fedora QA] #91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: dafrito Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Compon

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post, but figured it's worth CCing devel in case > anyone has concerns on these. > > I'm currently working on a plan to expand desktop validation testing. As > part of the discussion around this, Christoph Wickert prop

Re: Interesting dependencies

2010-06-29 Thread Martin Sourada
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 13:36 -0700, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Tablesyum remove constantine-backgrounds looks interesting today: > > Removing: > constantine-backgrounds > Removing for dependencies: > gnome-desktop3 Most likely this^^ is the culprit ;-) Right now it should probably requ

request for old deltaiso uploads

2010-06-29 Thread Andre Robatino
I'm planning to start archiving deltaisos permanently from now on, in order to allow reconstructing old TCs/RCs (which are not currently archived - see https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2241 ). I currently have all disos from 13 Beta to 13 Final (both i386 and x86_64), and Fedo

Interesting dependencies

2010-06-29 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Tablesyum remove constantine-backgrounds looks interesting today: Removing: constantine-backgrounds Removing for dependencies: compiz-gnome compizconfig-backend-gconf control-center deja-dup desktop-effects file-roller gdm gdm-plugin-fingerprint gdm-user-switch-applet gn

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:33 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:26 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > > I just discovered that it might be possible to use the command-line > > bodhi tool to gather this information. > > > > # bodhi --critpath -r F13 > > Getting a li

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread Robert 'Bob' Jensen
I read the subject as "let's activate protesters!" Please carry on... -- Bob | Robert 'Bob' Jensen|| Fedora Unity Founder | | b...@fedoraunity.org|| http://fedoraunity.org/

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:26 -0400, James Laska wrote: > I just discovered that it might be possible to use the command-line > bodhi tool to gather this information. > > # bodhi --critpath -r F13 > Getting a list of critical path updates... > 0 pending critical path updates

RE: New BugZapper Introduction

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 13:55 -0400, Terry Bonito wrote: > Well thats refreshing. Im glad to see a sense of humor exists among > the community =D. Thank you. Bugzappers is 80% humour, 20% triaging. ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject

RE: New BugZapper Introduction

2010-06-29 Thread Terry Bonito
Well thats refreshing. Im glad to see a sense of humor exists among the community =D. Thank you. _ Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox. http://www.win

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

2010-06-29 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post, but figured it's worth CCing devel in case > anyone has concerns on these. > > I'm currently working on a plan to expand desktop validation testing. As > part of the discussion around this, Christoph Wickert prop

Re: New BugZapper Introduction

2010-06-29 Thread TK009
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 11:54:18 -0400 Terry Bonito wrote: > > Unfortunatly I wasnt able to make it to the meeting. I was actually > trying to install nvidia drivers but ran into some trouble and had to > boot off of my livecd to fix the issue. Not a bug ;) just didnt > install the correct kernel. I

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 14:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, everyone. > > Looking at the status of the proven testers project, I reckon it's about > ready to go. We're tinkering with the wiki pages still, but we have > everything in place that really _needs_ to be in place. > > So far we say

RE: New BugZapper Introduction

2010-06-29 Thread Terry Bonito
Unfortunatly I wasnt able to make it to the meeting. I was actually trying to install nvidia drivers but ran into some trouble and had to boot off of my livecd to fix the issue. Not a bug ;) just didnt install the correct kernel. Im running 32bit on a 64bit machine so I needed the PAE kernel to

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-06-29 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing AcetoneISO2-2.2.2-2.fc12 autotrust-0.3.1-5.fc12 cherokee-1.0.4-1.fc12 cups-1.4.4-5.fc12 dbus-glib-0.86-1.fc12 eclipse-cdt-6.0.2-2.fc12 elfutils-0.148-1.fc12 geoclue-0.12.0-1.fc12 gimp-2.6.9-3.fc1

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-06-29 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing elfutils-0.148-1.fc13 evolution-mapi-0.30.2.1-1.fc13 ghc-rpm-macros-0.7.1-1.fc13 libisds-0.3.1-1.fc13 opencryptoki-2.3.1-6.fc13 python-mako-0.3.4-1.fc13 Details about builds: =

RE: Proven Tester documentation

2010-06-29 Thread John Dulaney
Roger, that. Web-stuff is my weakness; I need to learn how to create pages, etc. in the Wiki. At least I don't have to deal with HTML *shudder*. > Subject: Re: Proven Tester documentation > From: jla...@redhat.com > To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:43:25 -0400 > >

rawhide report: 20100629 changes

2010-06-29 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Jun 29 08:15:21 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:control-center-2.31.3-2.fc14.i686

[Fedora QA] #98: Request for a Mentor

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#98: Request for a Mentor -+-- Reporter: jdulaney | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: P

Re: New BugZapper Introduction

2010-06-29 Thread TK009
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:52:07 -0400 Terry Bonito wrote: > > Hello, > > Im Terry and im interested in working to help improve Fedora Linux. > Im 21 and i've been using Fedora for over 5 years. I use Fedora for > everything. I mostly use it for media related thing such as listening > to music, wat

Re: Proven Tester documentation

2010-06-29 Thread James Laska
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 09:26 -0400, John Dulaney wrote: > It is done: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jdulaney Thanks John. I hope you don't mind, but I had a hard time groking the document structure while it was nested in another page. I moved your content into a new page to more closely m

[Fedora QA] #97: Request for a mentor

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#97: Request for a mentor -+-- Reporter: masami | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Component: P

Re: Proven Tester documentation

2010-06-29 Thread John Dulaney
It is done:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jdulaney From: awill...@redhat.com To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:35:57 -0700 Subject: Re: Proven Tester documentation On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 18:12 -0400, John Dulaney wrote: > During the meeting today it was decided to

Broken dependencies with Fedora 13 + updates-testing - 2010-06-29

2010-06-29 Thread Michael Schwendt
== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): almanah anjal bind-dyndb-ldap dnsperf

Re: [Fedora QA] #86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Componen

Re: [Fedora QA] #88: Add test coverage for 'basic video driver install'

2010-06-29 Thread Fedora QA
#88: Add test coverage for 'basic video driver install' --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14

Re: proposal: let's activate proventesters!

2010-06-29 Thread Kamil Paral
- "Adam Williamson" wrote: > Hey, everyone. > > Looking at the status of the proven testers project, I reckon it's > about > ready to go. We're tinkering with the wiki pages still, but we have > everything in place that really _needs_ to be in place. > > So far we say we're waiting on infra