Broken dependencies with Fedora 12 + updates-testing - 2010-06-25

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): autotrust eclipse-cdt joni mrpt msp430

Broken dependencies with Fedora 13 + updates-testing - 2010-06-25

== The results in this summary consider Test Updates! == Summary of broken packages (by src.rpm name): almanah anerley anjal contact-lookup-apple

Re: [Fedora QA] #91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs

#91: Add VERIFIED state to BugZapper wiki docs --+- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: dafrito Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Compon

Re: conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.1-118.fc14.i686 and perl-4:5.12.1-123.fc14.x86_64

On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Paul Crook wrote: > I'm hoping this is the correct place to raise this. > > Is anyone else currently getting the error below when doing yum update? > "conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.1-118.fc14.i686 and > perl-4:5.12.1-123.fc14.x86_64" This is the sort of

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing bugzilla-3.4.7-1.fc12 cups-1.4.4-4.fc12 kpartsplugin-0.0.1-0.2.20100604a.fc12 numpy-1.3.0-9.fc12 pekwm-0.1.12-4.fc12 pipviewer-0.3.9-7.fc12 python-paste-1.7.4-1.fc12 redhat-lsb-4.0-4.fc12 sems-1.

Re: [Fedora QA] #72: Proposal for reducing test permutations

#72: Proposal for reducing test permutations --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Rev

Re: [Fedora QA] #72: Proposal for reducing test permutations

#72: Proposal for reducing test permutations --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Rev

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 15:28 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 25 June 2010 08:14, Kamil Paral wrote: > > How hard is this to check? > > If gpk-update-icon starts checking for updates, which you can tell > either my watching it with pkmon, or just by observing the "updates > available" star that a

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 03:14 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote: > And what about this one additional: > > * Network interfaces must be configured properly and automatically > enabled on boot so that Internet/LAN connection works by default > whenever possible. This requirement does not apply when cus

conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.1-118.fc14.i686 and perl-4:5.12.1-123.fc14.x86_64

Hi, I'm hoping this is the correct place to raise this. Is anyone else currently getting the error below when doing yum update? "conflicts between attempted installs of perl-4:5.10.1-118.fc14.i686 and perl-4:5.12.1-123.fc14.x86_64" Paul -- Heriot-Watt University is a Scottish charity registe

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

On 25 June 2010 08:14, Kamil Paral wrote: > How hard is this to check? If gpk-update-icon starts checking for updates, which you can tell either my watching it with pkmon, or just by observing the "updates available" star that appears. Richard. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org

rawhide report: 20100625 changes

Compose started at Fri Jun 25 08:15:20 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires li

Re: Review swap: xnoise and xnoise-plugins-core

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:08:43 +0200, Michel wrote: > I have two easy reviews to trade: > > xnoise, a tracklist-centric media player: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 > and > xnoise-plugins-core, some plugins that ship with it: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60777

Re: Review swap: xnoise and xnoise-plugins-core

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:41 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:08 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: >> > I have two easy reviews to trade: >> > >> > xnoise, a tracklist-centric media player: >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.co

[Fedora QA] #95: Create installation test results template and test plan for F-14

#95: Create installation test results template and test plan for F-14 ---+ Reporter: rhe| Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki

Re: [Fedora QA] #72: Proposal for reducing test permutations

#72: Proposal for reducing test permutations --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Rev

Re: Review swap: xnoise and xnoise-plugins-core

On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 11:41 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Thu, 2010-06-24 at 21:08 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > > I have two easy reviews to trade: > > > > xnoise, a tracklist-centric media player: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60 > > and > > xnoise-plugins-core, s

Re: Proposed release criteria additions for F14+

- "Adam Williamson" wrote: > Sorry for the cross-post, but figured it's worth CCing devel in case > anyone has concerns on these. > > I'm currently working on a plan to expand desktop validation testing. > As > part of the discussion around this, Christoph Wickert proposed > several > additi